Risk for baby after too many ultrasounds — The Bump
May 2017 Moms

Risk for baby after too many ultrasounds

Hi ladies,
a friend of mine recently told me about recent studies telling that more than 4 u/s during pregnancy imply risks for the baby. I still don't get the reference for that friend, but I have found other articles sharing that concern: http://www.wsj.com/articles/pregnant-women-get-more-ultrasounds-without-clear-medical-need-1437141219

What do you think? Any of your ob/gyn agreeing with that? Do you think the risk worth it?

Re: Risk for baby after too many ultrasounds

  • Well, I was pretty high risk with my oldest. I had well over 100 ultrasounds....not even exaggerating. She's just fine. 
  • I'm not going to bother reading the article because I don't want to end up worrying myself. I already had 2 ultrasounds and know there were definitely be at least two more. Not good for a PGAL brain or anybody who gets worried easily.

    FWIW, I had 3 with DD and she's just fine. Just driving me a little crazy today but I think that's normal.

  • Loading the player...
  • Well I had 20+ ultrasounds with my twins and I've already had 7 this pregnancy, all administered by physicians. 

    I was was also told by my OB that there has not been any clear evidence on the effects of frequent ultrasounds and harm to the baby.

    ~~~~~~~~~Siggy Warning~~~~~~~~

    Me~28 DH~27 

     6-12-2010  Miscarriage. 
    3-16-2012 D&C/Miscarriage.
     Blocked Left Tube. 
    Diminished Ovarian Reserve   
    MFI - Sperm Morphology 2%.  
     Abnormal Antiphospholipid Antibodies
    April 2013 ~  1st IUI attempt - 100 mg Clomid- Canceled
    May 2013  ~ 2nd IUI attempt -100 mg Clomid- Canceled
    June 2013 ~ 3rd IUI attempt - 100 mg Clomid+ Trigger+ Progesterone~BFN
     IVF/ICSI #1 May 2014 ~ Freeze All ~ Due to OHSS
     5/1/2014 ~ 22 retrieved, 12 fertilized, 3 frozen
    5/28/2014 ~ FET#1 ~ Transferred 2 Hatching Blasts
      6/1/2014~ **BFP**
    6/9/2014 Beta #1 ~ 1022
    6/12/2014 Beta #2 ~ 3099
    6/16/2014 Beta #3 ~ >5000
    6/19/2014 First U/S ~ TWINS!!!  
    1/7/2015 Twins born @ 34 weeks

    image image Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  • I've had 6 high risk pregnancies.  I've never counted the number of ultrasounds but I guarantee I've had more than my share, as anyone who is/was high risk will attest.  The MFM's never seem to be worried about the number of us's.  My 10 year old seems to have his brain fried, I think that's more to do with being 10 than any us, he was fine for the first 9 years!  
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
    EDD: 06/25/2006  M/C: 11/03/2005
    EDD: 04/08/2012  M/C: 09/03/2011
    EDD: 12/27/2012  Born Sleeping: 07/19/2012
    EDD: 12/07/2013  M/C 05/30/2013 & 05/31/2013
    EDD:  07/01/2016 Born sleeping: 03/02/2016

  • My daughter was breach and I was high-risk with other factors.  I had more than 4 u/s and she's totally fine.  My doctor never cautioned against them at all and they were able to gather a lot of useful info from them.

    BFP #1 12/23/12 EDD 9/3/13 DD #1 8/26/13

    BFP #2  2/25/16  EDD 11/5/16 MMC 4/15/16

    BFP #3  8/31/16  EDD  5/12/17 It's a GIRL!

    BabyFruit Ticker Visit The Nest

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

  • My doctor provided an article in her prenatal handbook advising against optional, "keepsake" ultrasounds. It is attached. If the ultrasounds are medically necessary, I wouldn't worry. For example, I had one last week and another is scheduled in a few weeks to keep an eye on ovarian cysts. 
  • Very interesting! Thank you for sharing!

    clebl24 said:

  • Interesting but no one needs something else to worry about. I wouldn't give this a second thought. 

    BabyFruit Ticker
  • I had 3 so far to check up on my cyst. I asked if I should be concerned and if so many could be harmful to the baby so early on, but my ob said that it is fine and he was not worried at all. He's been head of the department for over 20 years and has always been very honest with me so I believe and trust him.
  • I had 6 with DD. All medically mandated. So it's hard to really know where the line is at. What is too many if the doctor keeps wanting to check on baby for different reasons? I agree that this is not something else to be worrying about. 
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
    Me: 38 DH: 36
    Married 8/27/2011
    BFP #1 9/28/2011 DS born 5/22/2012
    BFP #2 4/24/2013 m/c 4/25/2013 at 4w
    BFP #3 1/31/2014 DD born 10/14/2014
    BFP #4 1/20/2016 m/c 2/12/2014 at 7w2d
    BFP #5 8/19/2016 DS2 born 4/29/2017
    BFP #6 3/7/2018 EDD 11/18/2018

  • I've only heard of possible damage to hearing as the ultrasound makes the image possible with sound waves. Didn't read article. I know that the 3d ones are very high powered and not recommended more than once for hearing protection. If a dr feels it's necessary to check let's say you suddenly stop measuring properly after your 20 week one of course they are gonna check inside w ultrasound without a second thought the risk is nothing compared to the gain in that situation 
  • Just what I need! Another thing to worry about.. haha
    Because of all my previous miscarriages my doctor is keeping a close eye and I've already had three and one scheduled next week!!
  • I had several in my last pregnancy to monitor for pre-e and my son is perfectly healthy. I honestly don't question it if they are necessary to know the health of my baby. 
    BabyFruit Ticker
  • I've already had 3 u/s so far at 8w3d and likely 1 a week due to an SCH and until that is resolved they will keep monitoring.  But hooray for another thing to worry about!
    Lilypie Maternity tickers
  • DS1 7/24/15

    DS2 5/7/17

  • I just stumbled upon this thread and love all of the science as well as the reaction to it!

    My first thought, without reading the article (so take it with a grain of salt), was the same as @Squirtgun -- people who have lots of ultrasounds usually need them more than people who don't, for other reasons that might put their pregnancies at risk. That said, I did read the scanned in article here from @clebl24 and the science dump from @mdlorenz . It's not necessarily a non-issue, but also not something to worry ourselves about. Just get the ultrasounds you need and no more.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • @NotAPlaya-JustCrushAlot that Jesse Pinkman gif is perfection!
  • I love this thread.  My general non-exempt medical opinion is that it's still relatively new so I'm not going to run out and get a dozen ultrasounds from some dude in a mall (not that we have that here and I've never personally seen one, so it still boggles my mind that they exist), but if my doctor wants to do an u/s for diagnostic purposes, I'm all in.  I did say no to optional scans and should only have two (dating and a/s) unless something comes up.

    B born 7/15/13, C born 3/2/15, #3 on the way May '17

    I’m a modern man, a man for the millennium. Digital and smoke free. A diversified multi-cultural, post-modern deconstruction that is anatomically and ecologically incorrect. I’ve been up linked and downloaded, I’ve been inputted and outsourced, I know the upside of downsizing, I know the downside of upgrading. I’m a high-tech low-life. A cutting edge, state-of-the-art bi-coastal multi-tasker and I can give you a gigabyte in a nanosecond! I’m new wave, but I’m old school and my inner child is outward bound. I’m a hot-wired, heat seeking, warm-hearted cool customer, voice activated and bio-degradable. I interface with my database, my database is in cyberspace, so I’m interactive, I’m hyperactive and from time to time I’m radioactive.

  • I've definitely heard this subject come up when my girlfriend's were both pregnant last year.

    Being the person that I am, I will not be reading the article, and freak myself out. **Sorry :)

    I will agree with @JCWhitey , I will get US through my trusted doc. lol

     23 y/o;
    First time mommy <3 [05/06/17]

    90% of the way there :D

    Pregnancy Ticker

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards