September 2015 Moms

CIO success!

I don't know what it was, but the day my son turned 4 months he started sleeping SO much better! He went from waking up numerous times a night to only waking up between 4/5am to eat. I started CIO and it worked really, really well. So far he hasn't cried more than 19 minutes. It's usually less than 5. Anyone else have success with CIO? 
«1

Re: CIO success!

  • Loading the player...
  • We did!!! At two months my ped was telling us to let him cry so he can figure out how to put himself to sleep but we waited til 4. Took three nights! We used the Ferber method so you go in after three minutes then 5 minute then 10 - then every 10 til they fall asleep. The first night took and hour, the second night took 40 minutes, the third night 30 minutes and fourth night no tears at all - now I put him down drowsy and he self soothes to sleep. It's incredible! 
  • I had great success with it also. Glad you found something that worked for you! 
  • kanga915 said:
    Letting a 4 month old cry for 19 minutes is cruel. 
    This. And by "successful" do you mean your baby eventually cried itself to sleep because it thought it was abandoned? That's what CIO does. Babies this age don't understand object permanence. It's cruel to leave them alone to scream in distress. Google "babywise" and you'll see studies that compare it to neglect.


    This is why it hurts my heart to see that so many people still use CIO. I thought it was an antiquated practice. 

  • yellow1daisyyellow1daisy member
    edited January 2016
    It's what you sign up for when you have a child. You might be tired but our bodies are capable of dealing with the fatigue. A 4 month old does not cry for no reason. You may think they have all they need. But they wouldn't be crying if they did. Even if what they need is help falling asleep. 

    Sometimes it is better to put the baby down and walk away if you sense yourself losing control. But as a method of sleep training it is cruel. You think it's working because the baby acts fine and falls asleep. You think they're learning independence when they really just learn to give up on you. You could be ruining how they form attachments as adults. 
     
    And I'm talking strictly infants. I wouldn't recommend CIO at any age but using it on infants is especially awful and just lazy parenting. 

    BFP May 2013 - MMC at 8 weeks
    BFP September 2013 - MMC at 12 weeks
    BFP February 2014 - early loss/CP at 4.5 weeks
    BFP May 2014 - MMC/ complete molar pregnancy at 11 weeks
    BFP December 2015 - DD born 8/18/2015
    BFP November 2016 - pending...



  • BFP May 2013 - MMC at 8 weeks
    BFP September 2013 - MMC at 12 weeks
    BFP February 2014 - early loss/CP at 4.5 weeks
    BFP May 2014 - MMC/ complete molar pregnancy at 11 weeks
    BFP December 2015 - DD born 8/18/2015
    BFP November 2016 - pending...



  • We did a modified cio. We went to pediatrician that gave us this pamphlet. It said at 4 months old babies weigh enough to sleep through the night and for us to stop feeding overnight. Sometimes he would wake us eat an oz and roll over to sleep again. He was 4 1/2 months at the 4 m appointment. The pamphlet said try to increase his oz per bottle and the distance between them we ep and supplement w formula now that i don't express enough. Once he was at 4 hour intervals with eating during the day we could attempt to not feed him overnight. First night we got up 3 times. First time that night he fussed moaned for about 20 mins couple times we went in. Each time after he fussed less, he doesn't take a paci. Next night he woke twice we repeated our new check pat method. Next night one wake up and now he's been sttn for over a week and it's fantastic. He eats 35 oz during day will sleep around 8 pm to 6 am. I'm glad cio worked for you it worked for us. And again it's never been a cry his cry is 0 to 60 he goes all red and doesn't breath and that's never happened in the crib. It's a fussy moan like hey I want you come back please type moan. Plus my husband is 45 raised by his grandparents from Italy it took alot after him reading that pamphlet to agree to even checking in and patting him those first nights. He wanted to put cereal in the bottles and I fought that too. Do you @shaina925
  • I'm happy you found something that worked for you. I personally don't have the strength to let my son cry for more then a few minuets at a time. 19 minuets is such a long time. I would be heartbroken 
  • Those who have never tried CIO may not realize that often its not abondonment, but over-tiredness. Sometimes my LO can sleep within minutes, and other times it can last up to 15 minutes of off and on crying/fussing. 

    Last week I let him sleep in my arms because I was enjoying our cuddle time, but it was taking way more than 15 minutes to fall asleep, and even lasted up to an hour as we tried various techniques to get him to sleep.  This time was also on and off crying, but we went back to crying it out in the crib, which seems to work better for him. 
  • Livvyloo87Livvyloo87 member
    edited January 2016
    Agreed @ChristaG22 @backatac I would also wager that EVERY mother has let a baby CIO to some degree but few would speak about it out of fear of social backlash.

    Good on @shaina925 for sharing her experience.  We too have had great success with it and bedtimes are stress free and happy times for both us and LO.  

    I've never understood why people deliberately comment on posts just to start a war...it's not like OP was asking for opinions on CIO or pros/cons.  
  • I haven't done this but I have a friend with two totally normal and well adjusted children that swears by the Ferber Method. It worked really well for her boys (I'm not sure what age she started it at). She said it took 3-4 nights of implementing that method and by the last night they didn't cry at all. That is actually a really well studied method and a form of CIO that has high success rates (the book Baby911 has a chapter where it compares all different sleep training models, the studies behind them and there efficacy- it also clearly outlines how to implement whichever method you feel best fits you. I would recommend the book). Anyways, I'm glad to hear it's working for you!
  • My lo sometimes has to cry herself to sleep. She doesn't always conk out right away in the car and cries till she's asleep. Other time I'm holding her and she still cries herself to sleep. I had a baby that could self soothe herself to sleep for about a month then sleep regression hit. While I wouldn't let her cry till she's asleep in her cradle, I do try and let her fuss a bit sometimes but If she never settles down I help her out. Hopefully your lo won't need to cry to fall asleep much longer! 
    image
  • While I get the point of sharing something on the Internet and wanting only positive reception... But that's not realistic. There are hundreds of moms on this group from all different backgrounds and when you post about a controversial topic you are definitely going to get a variety of different comments on the issue. Those who can't validate using the cry it out method for themselves are simply just either saying why and , or providing new research. 
    As for the comment about posting here in the future,  no offense she shouldn't be afraid to post here in the future. I'm sure she knows what type of group she joined. 
  • Livvyloo87Livvyloo87 member
    edited January 2016
    @ChristaG22 How awful of them. I hope they get satisfactation from being so nasty to another mother.  I bet OP would disagree with many aspects of their parenting choices but would never be so mean as to harass them about them.

    So shameful trying to bring another person down.  Again only commenting to bring a negative aspect to this thread - why bother? Plenty of other threads for people to comment on that better align with their parenting styles. 
  • Right! And then to suggest that she knew what kind of group she was joining. Ummm- this is a mom group to support moms. This is the first time I have seen this kind of reaction to a post and I am on here daily! There is no justification for being downright rude and intolerant. But I digress. Some people don't get it. 
  • jlawson23jlawson23 member
    edited January 2016
    @ChristaG22 clearly you are talking about my comment. I never said anything about her being cruel or a bad parent. I simply said that the CIO method would not work for me. As far as anything else I said my comments are realistic. She posted about a very controversial topic. My point is that she was definitely going to receive a variety of different types of feedback. Period. I didn't criticize her, nor were my intentions to make her feel bad. If it works for her family than by all means continue. 
  • I was answering your comment, but not accusing you of saying she was cruel or lazy. That was said in other comments if you read back through you will see.  All I am saying is that if people really feel the need to comment on a post that erks them, then they should do so tactfully. Some people did and that's fine. It's the other more nasty comments that I had a problem with. I just think we need to be kind to one another. Sharing research and such is important, but in this case it wasn't really asked for as this mom was celebrating her success, not asking for various opinions on the method she uses. 

    I reserve my opinion on the method here, but I saw a need to stand up for this mom in this case. And that's what I have done, hopefully :) 
  • My you have an affinity for the name calling. I'm not try to be a white night. I'm trying to promote tolerance. My point is to show tact if you must share. That's all I've said. And you've realized that your initial reaction was impulsive and explosive, so you got my point.

    Also, I would like to think that all mom groups would be support groups and that we post where our opinions are sought out. There's no point in telling her to wait it out, because she's already practice the method and babe sleeps now.

    We have a common belief in that I don't practice CIO either- but I don't begrudge others who do.  
  • yellow1daisyyellow1daisy member
    edited February 2016
    Well I'm not for letting people go on with ignorance. If she didn't know the research maybe she does now. And if her baby has a set back, maybe she'll handle it differently. But it's not all about the OP. My comments, again, were not to attack her personally. 

    Maybe someone else who reads this thread won't think, I'd better let my baby CIO to achieve these amazing results. 

    You were being a white knight. You felt the need to stick up for the OP as though I'm sitting here bashing her which I was not. 'My you have an affinity for name calling' is a passive aggressive comment no matter how superior you like to think you're being.

    Whatever, I've said my piece. I don't care to discuss this any further. 
    BFP May 2013 - MMC at 8 weeks
    BFP September 2013 - MMC at 12 weeks
    BFP February 2014 - early loss/CP at 4.5 weeks
    BFP May 2014 - MMC/ complete molar pregnancy at 11 weeks
    BFP December 2015 - DD born 8/18/2015
    BFP November 2016 - pending...



Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"