well we finally found out that we will be welcoming our baby BOY Liam Mitchell in September! I was really wanting a boy for the first baby. Super excited. Anyone find out what they are having this week?!
It's sex, not gender. Congrats! We found out LO is a girl at 19 weeks. I was happy but hubby was THRILLED, he really wanted a girl!
Also, just an internet safety tip, you may want to remove your child's full name from your post. There are a lot of weirdos out there and anyone can read these forums. ETA: Just realized your last name is also in your username. You can ask an admin to change that for you.
It's sex, not gender. Congrats! We found out LO is a girl at 19 weeks. I was happy but hubby was THRILLED, he really wanted a girl!
Also, just an internet safety tip, you may want to remove your child's full name from your post. There are a lot of weirdos out there and anyone can read these forums. ETA: Just realized your last name is also in your username. You can ask an admin to change that for you.
my doctor called it the gender reveal which is why i called it that too.
It's sex, not gender. Congrats! We found out LO is a girl at 19 weeks. I was happy but hubby was THRILLED, he really wanted a girl!
Also, just an internet safety tip, you may want to remove your child's full name from your post. There are a lot of weirdos out there and anyone can read these forums. ETA: Just realized your last name is also in your username. You can ask an admin to change that for you.
my doctor called it the gender reveal which is why i called it that too.
Doesn't change the fact that gender =/= sex. Your doctor is wrong.
DS1: BFP 04/03/11 | EDD 12/02/11 | born 11/21/11 DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
ETA What's scary about the difference between gender and sex?
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
Ok. Tell me how I'm wrong? This isn't about tolerance, obviously parents should encourage children to be who they are and be vigilant about any identity confusion or other types of stress the child might be experiencing as they age and be accepting and encouraging. That does not change the fact that for 95% of mothers (under the most generous statistics) gender assignment at birth will be accurate. If you had a 95% accuracy rate for any other type of diagnosis you wouldn't question it but would change course if it looked like you needed it. Parents work with what's in front of them and are trying their hardest.
I'm sure it's a lot easier to post a gif and make the op feel like crap than it is to think critically.
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
Ok. Tell me how I'm wrong? This isn't about tolerance, obviously parents should encourage children to be who they are and be vigilant about any identity confusion or other types of stress the child might be experiencing as they age and be accepting and encouraging. That does not change the fact that for 95% of mothers (under the most generous statistics) gender assignment at birth will be accurate. If you had a 95% accuracy rate for any other type of diagnosis you wouldn't question it but would change course if it looked like you needed it. Parents work with what's in front of them and are trying their hardest.
I'm sure it's a lot easier to post a gif and make the op feel like crap than it is to think critically.
Really 95%? Can you cite your source. Even if there was a citation how many trans people do you think actually provide honest information in these statistics? Being transgendered is still not widely accepted especially if not in countries that are more liberal.
Actually the most legitimate source I can find puts it at .3%. But transgenderlaw.org (it's a pdf so I cannot link to it) estimates that it is between 2 and 5%. Their study's population size is smaller. None of which takes away from the importance of accepting the trans population, it just means we can probably cut each other some slack. Pregnancy is hard enough without having your every word and thought policed.
No matter how many people are actually transgender, I think that by now we should have moved beyond the traditional gender roles or trying to categorize people.
My sex is female, but my choices in clothes, activities, friends or whatever are typical of my persona, not an assigned gender role. In so many situations in life I have been judged based on society's assumption about me according to a stereotypical gender. I think we can give our children something better. And that starts with separating the physical sex from gender roles.
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
Uh, no. In the majority of cases, gender matches sex. That doesn't mean that gender and sex have the same meaning (because they don't).
DS1: BFP 04/03/11 | EDD 12/02/11 | born 11/21/11 DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
Uh, no. In the majority of cases, gender matches sex. That doesn't mean that gender and sex have the same meaning (because they don't).
I think it is clear that I meant that gender assignment based on sex is accurate in the vast majority of cases. Which is true.
I'm not trying to start anything here but this is not the first time I've seen someone get jumped on over the gender vs sex thing. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for being PC but clearly there is no ill intentions on these ladies behalf. I had a gender reveal party when we discovered the sex of the baby. I don't feel any sort of way for calling the party that. I agree with PP, in the majority of cases - gender matches sex. For all of you who love to give people a hard time, let me ask.... After you discovered the sex of your baby did you go out and get gender neutral clothes and nursery items for your little one? This whole becoming a parent has been as exciting as it has been stressful. I don't think we need to add this whole gender identity business to it all's
We found out we're having a bit too!!! We are super excited about our little guy. I've gone out and started getting all sorts of boy stuff. My husband and I are going to assume our baby boy is masculine. If he shows any signs that he is not then we will change course. Also, this might be where some of the confusion is coming from.. (got this from Webster's)
gen·der \ˈjen-dər\ noun : the state of being male or female grammar : one of the categories (masculine, feminine, and neuter)
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
Uh, no. In the majority of cases, gender matches sex. That doesn't mean that gender and sex have the same meaning (because they don't). I think it is clear that I meant that gender assignment based on sex is accurate in the vast majority of cases. Which is true.
Just because a group is in the minority doesn't at all mean that the issues they face aren't valid. And just because you specifically may understand the implication, that doesn't mean that everyone reading this will know and may end up taking it literally. It's always better to spread knowledge instead of fostering ignorance.
When someone posts here that they are having a boy or a girl people say 'congratulations on your x!' They do not say, 'you cannot know for sure if it is a boy or a girl or if it will be confused and maybe lie somewhere in between because gender identity issues can arise.' But everyone DOES jump on people when they say gender instead of sex. I am very confused as to why this is because I don't see the distinction.
This is because gender identity issues are extremely complex and rarely fall on a black and white spectrum. For the vast majority of women, the result they get from their doctor while pregnant will be reflected in both the gentalia and the personality of the child they raise (with I would hope obvious notes that girls can like monster trucks and boys can like barbies and still feel like the girls and boys they identify as). And for a significant amount of transgendered people this distinction falls a bit flat as well I imgaine because they DO feel like the opposite gender and frequently take surgical steps to ensure their 'sex' (at least sexual organs since chromosomes cannot be altered) does match up with their self identified gender.
I don't know what you read into any of my posts that implied that I felt that the trans population's issues and feelings are not valid. I just do not understand how ensuring pregnant women don't slip up on a linguistic techincality is really advocating for trans awareness. Ensuring parents know that this is something their child can face and that it is a real thing that they should embrace and support is critical. But for the baby years, there's really no way to know, so parents proceed the only way they know how. I don't think parents should feel preemptively like they are prejudiced because they work with the information they have at hand until different information presents itself. Generally opposed to all versions of 'mommy shaming' which, personally, is how I read the constant correction of terms that were said innocently. I think its a way to say 'you're not as accepting of a mom as I am, better shape up!'
When someone posts here that they are having a boy or a girl people say 'congratulations on your x!' They do not say, 'you cannot know for sure if it is a boy or a girl or if it will be confused and maybe lie somewhere in between because gender identity issues can arise.' But everyone DOES jump on people when they say gender instead of sex. I am very confused as to why this is because I don't see the distinction.
This is because gender identity issues are extremely complex and rarely fall on a black and white spectrum. For the vast majority of women, the result they get from their doctor while pregnant will be reflected in both the gentalia and the personality of the child they raise (with I would hope obvious notes that girls can like monster trucks and boys can like barbies and still feel like the girls and boys they identify as). And for a significant amount of transgendered people this distinction falls a bit flat as well I imgaine because they DO feel like the opposite gender and frequently take surgical steps to ensure their 'sex' (at least sexual organs since chromosomes cannot be altered) does match up with their self identified gender.
I don't know what you read into any of my posts that implied that I felt that the trans population's issues and feelings are not valid. I just do not understand how ensuring pregnant women don't slip up on a linguistic techincality is really advocating for trans awareness. Ensuring parents know that this is something their child can face and that it is a real thing that they should embrace and support is critical. But for the baby years, there's really no way to know, so parents proceed the only way they know how. I don't think parents should feel preemptively like they are prejudiced because they work with the information they have at hand until different information presents itself. Generally opposed to all versions of 'mommy shaming' which, personally, is how I read the constant correction of terms that were said innocently. I think its a way to say 'you're not as accepting of a mom as I am, better shape up!'
Obviously.
It is perfectly to fine to say, "I'm having a boy/I'm having a girl." That is your baby's SEX. Not gender.
DS1: BFP 04/03/11 | EDD 12/02/11 | born 11/21/11 DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
What? Sex is explicitly tied to genetalia and chromosomal makeup. Gender is a much more fluid and complicated concept having to do with cultural and societal norms and biological imperatives and how people identify. I think generally when someone says 'I'm having a boy!' they mean, I am about to go out a buy blue clothes and a baseball glove and paint race cars on the walls of my nursery! Which is everything I THINK you all have a problem with when someone says you are assuming gender. They are not simply telling you, 'my baby has a penis! I am excited about this anatomical development!'
I don't care that people are excited to dress their boy as a boy or a girl in frilly shit. The whole entire point is, that stuff is done based on the SEX, not the gender. They are connected but NOT the same thing. How that's considered "mommy shaming", I have no freaking clue. It's really considered being a decent and considerate human being.
Gender DOES matter to many people. Just because it has no bearing in your life doesn't mean it's not important. That's like someone who has never experienced racism to tell someone who has that their experiences don't matter because it doesn't happen to everyone so no need to concern yourself over it. This isn't an abstract idea. It's not hard to understand.
Seriously where did I say it didn't matter? Every one of my posts has emphasized that parents should be observing their children to ensure that they are loved and supported no matter who they are. This issue actually does have personal bearing on my life and in my family so this is not an abstract idea to me. GENDER is reflected in things like how you dress your children, and what 'behaviors' you encourage. While it is not the only thing, it IS frequently the outward manifestation of those inward ideas. You seem to want to villify me without actually listening to anything I am saying. I think when it comes to BABIES, this conversation is just not relevant and people work with the best knowledge they have and that shouldn't be shamed. It is lazy form of activism to say that making this distinction in the womb promotes acceptance when in reality it takes years of nurturing and paying attention to your children and being open to whoever they choose to be to ACTUALLY accept gender identity issues.
I'm not trying to start anything here but this is not the first time I've seen someone get jumped on over the gender vs sex thing. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for being PC but clearly there is no ill intentions on these ladies behalf. I had a gender reveal party when we discovered the sex of the baby. I don't feel any sort of way for calling the party that. I agree with PP, in the majority of cases - gender matches sex. For all of you who love to give people a hard time, let me ask.... After you discovered the sex of your baby did you go out and get gender neutral clothes and nursery items for your little one? This whole becoming a parent has been as exciting as it has been stressful. I don't think we need to add this whole gender identity business to it all's
We found out we're having a bit too!!! We are super excited about our little guy. I've gone out and started getting all sorts of boy stuff. My husband and I are going to assume our baby boy is masculine. If he shows any signs that he is not then we will change course. Also, this might be where some of the confusion is coming from.. (got this from Webster's)
gen·der \ˈjen-dər\ noun : the state of being male or female grammar : one of the categories (masculine, feminine, and neuter)
I don't assume sex and traditional gender stereotypes match. Even if sex and gender identification match. Yes, I was excited when I found out DS was a boy. We bought some blue (also my favorite color. I hate green with an absolute passion). I bought him gender neutral toys. He has some stereotypical boy toys- like trucks. He also has stereotypical girl toys - like dolls. There are no girl toys or boy toys in our house. Just toys. Now, if he only wants to play with the stereotypical boy toys - that's fine. As long as it is his choice and both are offered.
And this was not done because of being PC to transgendered people (although I am, and if DS is transgendered. Awesome. We'll support him). This was done because I don't believe in gender stereotypes. "Boy" toys can reach girls about mechanics (among other things) and "girl toys" can reach boys empathy. I want him to find what he likes and not be held back. He could be the most stereotypical boy in the world - as long as he has had the opportunity to explore what he likes and identifies with.
I guess it's because I don't like being stereotyped because I am female (or anything else), so I don't want my son to have that as well.
I don't care that people are excited to dress their boy as a boy or a girl in frilly shit. The whole entire point is, that stuff is done based on the SEX, not the gender. They are connected but NOT the same thing. How that's considered "mommy shaming", I have no freaking clue. It's really considered being a decent and considerate human being.
Gender DOES matter to many people. Just because it has no bearing in your life doesn't mean it's not important. That's like someone who has never experienced racism to tell someone who has that their experiences don't matter because it doesn't happen to everyone so no need to concern yourself over it. This isn't an abstract idea. It's not hard to understand.
Also, when my sister and I corrected my mom on sex vs gender, she asked the difference. My sister (who studied anthropology in university) backed me up with sex is physical, gender is societal. We also have to remember, gender identification can vary from country to country / culture to culture. What it means to identify as a girl in North America can be vastly different from identifying as a girl in the middle East.
Seriously where did I say it didn't matter? Every one of my posts has emphasized that parents should be observing their children to ensure that they are loved and supported no matter who they are. This issue actually does have personal bearing on my life and in my family so this is not an abstract idea to me. GENDER is reflected in things like how you dress your children, and what 'behaviors' you encourage. While it is not the only thing, it IS frequently the outward manifestation of those inward ideas. You seem to want to villify me without actually listening to anything I am saying. I think when it comes to BABIES, this conversation is just not relevant and people work with the best knowledge they have and that shouldn't be shamed. It is lazy form of activism to say that making this distinction in the womb promotes acceptance when in reality it takes years of nurturing and paying attention to your children and being open to whoever they choose to be to ACTUALLY accept gender identity issues.
How do you pick and choose when an issue is relevant? It all starts with the parent, so the way they use language and express ideas and opinions will be reflected on the child. You're choosing to argue and call this "lazy activism" when I think it's lazy to keep using the incorrect term despite the fact that you (seem to) understand that it's wrong. You seem to think that it's wrong to correct a pregnant woman on the basis of mommy shaming, which makes absolutely no sense. I really don't get why you must argue about it. This whole thread didn't even have to happen. It's called accepting the correction and moving on with life instead of getting all uptight and stubbornly trying to prove why using an incorrect term is okay.
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
I am happy for you that you think the world is not as scary as people think, but I also hope for your safety as well as the safety of your unborn child that you come out of your bubble and see reality. Watch the news recently? Did you miss the story about the woman in Colorado who responded to a Craigslist add for baby stuff and had her baby cut out of her? I am 32, by the time I was 16 I knew 3 people who were kidnapped - 1 of the 3 survived, the other 2 were murdered, and I grew up in a nice area.
Seriously where did I say it didn't matter? Every one of my posts has emphasized that parents should be observing their children to ensure that they are loved and supported no matter who they are. This issue actually does have personal bearing on my life and in my family so this is not an abstract idea to me. GENDER is reflected in things like how you dress your children, and what 'behaviors' you encourage. While it is not the only thing, it IS frequently the outward manifestation of those inward ideas. You seem to want to villify me without actually listening to anything I am saying. I think when it comes to BABIES, this conversation is just not relevant and people work with the best knowledge they have and that shouldn't be shamed. It is lazy form of activism to say that making this distinction in the womb promotes acceptance when in reality it takes years of nurturing and paying attention to your children and being open to whoever they choose to be to ACTUALLY accept gender identity issues.
How do you pick and choose when an issue is relevant? It all starts with the parent, so the way they use language and express ideas and opinions will be reflected on the child. You're choosing to argue and call this "lazy activism" when I think it's lazy to keep using the incorrect term despite the fact that you (seem to) understand that it's wrong. You seem to think that it's wrong to correct a pregnant woman on the basis of mommy shaming, which makes absolutely no sense. I really don't get why you must argue about it. This whole thread didn't even have to happen. It's called accepting the correction and moving on with life instead of getting all uptight and stubbornly trying to prove why using an incorrect term is okay.
Exactly. How do you pick and choose when an issue is relevant to another parent. I can't and neither can you all jumping down the throat of every person that makes this innocent and very rarely malicious error. I'm not attacking you for making a conscious choice to use the word sex, I'm criticizing you for being so critical of those who don't (without prejudicial intent).
I personally think gender is essentially interchangeable with sex for the first few years because the sex governs how most people make initial decisions (like names and clothes) and so it's not worth making someone feel bad over, and I've seen people be made to feel bad about this mistake over and over here. And it's called a gender identity issue for a reason. The problem presents when a person feels that their gender does not match their sex. Separating the terms with such a strict line diminishes the Transgender person by supposing that those differences don't matter to them when they are in fact generally the core issue at hand.
As you have said in other threads, if you post your opinion in a public forum then you don't get to choose who responds and with what opinions. I feel strongly about making pregnant women feel guilty, particularly on issues that they won't even be confronting for years.
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
I am happy for you that you think the world is not as scary as people think, but I also hope for your safety as well as the safety of your unborn child that you come out of your bubble and see reality. Watch the news recently? Did you miss the story about the woman in Colorado who responded to a Craigslist add for baby stuff and had her baby cut out of her? I am 32, by the time I was 16 I knew 3 people who were kidnapped - 1 of the 3 survived, the other 2 were murdered, and I grew up in a nice area.
Statistically speaking the world is safer (at least the United states is) than it was when we grew up. Of course there are dangerous people out there and my life hasn't been peaches and cream either but I try not to let my fear run my life. It is totally your prerogative to prioritize safety just as it is ops prerogative to not worry that much. To each their own.
Gender is correct in the vast vast vast majority of cases ☺. Congratulations on your boy...the world isn't quite as scary add people think I don't think ☺
I am happy for you that you think the world is not as scary as people think, but I also hope for your safety as well as the safety of your unborn child that you come out of your bubble and see reality. Watch the news recently? Did you miss the story about the woman in Colorado who responded to a Craigslist add for baby stuff and had her baby cut out of her? I am 32, by the time I was 16 I knew 3 people who were kidnapped - 1 of the 3 survived, the other 2 were murdered, and I grew up in a nice area.
Statistically speaking the world is safer (at least the United states is) than it was when we grew up. My life hasn't been peaches and cream either but I try not to let my fear run my life. It is totally your prerogative to prioritize safety just as it is ops prerogative to not worry that much. To each their own.
I agree you should not let fear paralyze you or completely run your life, but I also think that you should be smart about things and not make it easy for people to prey on you. For example, I am a firm believer that no one should post on Facebook that they are on vacation - that is asking for your house to get broken into. I also don't believe OP (or anyone else on here, I see it all of the time) should post their personal information. In fact, it is in the guidelines that you should not. If there is a wacko out there looking to prey on pregnant women, where would they go to first? A pregnancy forum. It is all about being smart so you don't become a victim.
Seriously where did I say it didn't matter? Every one of my posts has emphasized that parents should be observing their children to ensure that they are loved and supported no matter who they are. This issue actually does have personal bearing on my life and in my family so this is not an abstract idea to me. GENDER is reflected in things like how you dress your children, and what 'behaviors' you encourage. While it is not the only thing, it IS frequently the outward manifestation of those inward ideas. You seem to want to villify me without actually listening to anything I am saying. I think when it comes to BABIES, this conversation is just not relevant and people work with the best knowledge they have and that shouldn't be shamed. It is lazy form of activism to say that making this distinction in the womb promotes acceptance when in reality it takes years of nurturing and paying attention to your children and being open to whoever they choose to be to ACTUALLY accept gender identity issues.
How do you pick and choose when an issue is relevant? It all starts with the parent, so the way they use language and express ideas and opinions will be reflected on the child. You're choosing to argue and call this "lazy activism" when I think it's lazy to keep using the incorrect term despite the fact that you (seem to) understand that it's wrong. You seem to think that it's wrong to correct a pregnant woman on the basis of mommy shaming, which makes absolutely no sense. I really don't get why you must argue about it. This whole thread didn't even have to happen. It's called accepting the correction and moving on with life instead of getting all uptight and stubbornly trying to prove why using an incorrect term is okay.
Exactly. How do you pick and choose when an issue is relevant to another parent. I can't and neither can you all jumping down the throat of every person that makes this innocent and very rarely malicious error. I'm not attacking you for making a conscious choice to use the word sex, I'm criticizing you for being so critical of those who don't (without prejudicial intent).
I personally think gender is essentially interchangeable with sex for the first few years because the sex governs how most people make initial decisions (like names and clothes) and so it's not worth making someone feel bad over, and I've seen people be made to feel bad about this mistake over and over here. And it's called a gender identity issue for a reason. The problem presents when a person feels that their gender does not match their sex. Separating the terms with such a strict line diminishes the Transgender person by supposing that those differences don't matter to them when they are in fact generally the core issue at hand.
As you have said in other threads, if you post your opinion in a public forum then you don't get to choose who responds and with what opinions. I feel strongly about making pregnant women feel guilty, particularly on issues that they won't even be confronting for years.
So show me where she was "attacked maliciously". You can't because she wasn't. It was simply pointed out to her. Proper response? "Thanks for letting me know." And done. This isn't an opinion so you're very wrong there. It fact, it is what it is. So no, you can't disagree about facts. Many people do not make the distinction. I don't care about your opinion about the facts, just the facts.
Are pregnant women now fragile little butterflies that can't handle learning something new? Are pregnant women going to break apart if someone corrects them? Seriously, get off it. The "zomg I'm pregnant" excuse has long been played out. If you're not strong enough to handle responses on the Internet and feelings get hurt oh so easily then this isn't the place for you.
Seriously where did I say it didn't matter? Every one of my posts has emphasized that parents should be observing their children to ensure that they are loved and supported no matter who they are. This issue actually does have personal bearing on my life and in my family so this is not an abstract idea to me. GENDER is reflected in things like how you dress your children, and what 'behaviors' you encourage. While it is not the only thing, it IS frequently the outward manifestation of those inward ideas. You seem to want to villify me without actually listening to anything I am saying. I think when it comes to BABIES, this conversation is just not relevant and people work with the best knowledge they have and that shouldn't be shamed. It is lazy form of activism to say that making this distinction in the womb promotes acceptance when in reality it takes years of nurturing and paying attention to your children and being open to whoever they choose to be to ACTUALLY accept gender identity issues.
How do you pick and choose when an issue is relevant? It all starts with the parent, so the way they use language and express ideas and opinions will be reflected on the child. You're choosing to argue and call this "lazy activism" when I think it's lazy to keep using the incorrect term despite the fact that you (seem to) understand that it's wrong. You seem to think that it's wrong to correct a pregnant woman on the basis of mommy shaming, which makes absolutely no sense. I really don't get why you must argue about it. This whole thread didn't even have to happen. It's called accepting the correction and moving on with life instead of getting all uptight and stubbornly trying to prove why using an incorrect term is okay.
Exactly. How do you pick and choose when an issue is relevant to another parent. I can't and neither can you all jumping down the throat of every person that makes this innocent and very rarely malicious error. I'm not attacking you for making a conscious choice to use the word sex, I'm criticizing you for being so critical of those who don't (without prejudicial intent).
I personally think gender is essentially interchangeable with sex for the first few years because the sex governs how most people make initial decisions (like names and clothes) and so it's not worth making someone feel bad over, and I've seen people be made to feel bad about this mistake over and over here. And it's called a gender identity issue for a reason. The problem presents when a person feels that their gender does not match their sex. Separating the terms with such a strict line diminishes the Transgender person by supposing that those differences don't matter to them when they are in fact generally the core issue at hand.
As you have said in other threads, if you post your opinion in a public forum then you don't get to choose who responds and with what opinions. I feel strongly about making pregnant women feel guilty, particularly on issues that they won't even be confronting for years.
So show me where she was "attacked maliciously". You can't because she wasn't. It was simply pointed out to her. Proper response? "Thanks for letting me know." And done. This isn't an opinion so you're very wrong there. It fact, it is what it is. So no, you can't disagree about facts. Many people do not make the distinction. I don't care about your opinion about the facts, just the facts.
Are pregnant women now fragile little butterflies that can't handle learning something new? Are pregnant women going to break apart if someone corrects them? Seriously, get off it. The "zomg I'm pregnant" excuse has long been played out. If you're not strong enough to handle responses on the Internet and feelings get hurt oh so easily then this isn't the place for you.
Do I sound like a delicate little flower? Let me rephrase, I feel strongly about making anyone feel guilty about personal decisions they make in their lives when its a good person who's trying their best, especially when the issue is basically moot.
And while you are correct that the definition of sex and gender is a fact that cannot be debated, there is actually a lot of conversation and debate in the trans and scientific community about whether there is concrete value in the separation of the terms due to the inherent nature of how they depend upon each other and work together. Even the Wikipedia article could tell you that (also research papers and journals and the American psychological association). Like I said before, lazy activism. You want to throw out a pretentious correction every time someone posts this on a thread despite what seems to me like zero nuanced knowledge about the issues at hand.
I suppose she didn't get attacked, this was mostly the straw that broke the camels back seeing this happen on thread after thread after thread and confused ops feeling bad or attacked.
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
If they were not prejudicial jerks, they wouldn't interchange sex and gender if they knew better.
DS1: BFP 04/03/11 | EDD 12/02/11 | born 11/21/11 DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
If they were not prejudicial jerks, they wouldn't interchange sex and gender if they knew better.
I believe I have explained why I use them interchangeably. And that i have deep respect and compassion for the trans community. My belief comes from my experience with the culture and my research that I did along with my whole family when we had a relative come out as transitioning.
Seriously where did I say it didn't matter? Every one of my posts has emphasized that parents should be observing their children to ensure that they are loved and supported no matter who they are. This issue actually does have personal bearing on my life and in my family so this is not an abstract idea to me. GENDER is reflected in things like how you dress your children, and what 'behaviors' you encourage. While it is not the only thing, it IS frequently the outward manifestation of those inward ideas. You seem to want to villify me without actually listening to anything I am saying. I think when it comes to BABIES, this conversation is just not relevant and people work with the best knowledge they have and that shouldn't be shamed. It is lazy form of activism to say that making this distinction in the womb promotes acceptance when in reality it takes years of nurturing and paying attention to your children and being open to whoever they choose to be to ACTUALLY accept gender identity issues.
I think the point is that while the issue may not have a lot of bearing on a baby, you are speaking in a community where it may affect someone reading. So even though this isn't really yet a concept for a newborn, you (general you) are interchanging sex and gender TO people for which it may not be the same.
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
Call it what you want. I didn't say anything that wasn't fact, therefore I feel very confident saying what I said. It's true. You're just sick of seeing it around the boards but that's literally your problem. Pointing out a simple correction shouldn't turn into a whole debate, especially since it's based on (again) fact. You're projecting your own feelings on the matter because no one is being guilted or shamed. One sentence to correct the term completely doesn't qualify. You're really overreacting over nothing. And name calling is always "klassy", good job. =D>
Edited because I realize I got the context wrong. Not knowing the correct term doesn't make someone a prejudicial jerk. They just didn't know and didn't lurk around the boards to find out. Fine. There are many women around here who simply say "thanks for letting me know." Then there are the others who would rather argue the point because how dare someone correct them or they don't care to use the term correctly. There's a difference.
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
Call it what you want. I didn't say anything that wasn't fact, therefore I feel very confident saying what I said. It's true. You're just sick of seeing it around the boards but that's literally your problem. Pointing out a simple correction shouldn't turn into a whole debate, especially since it's based on (again) fact. You're projecting your own feelings on the matter because no one is being guilted or shamed. One sentence to correct the term completely doesn't qualify. You're really overreacting over nothing. And name calling is always "klassy", good job. =D>
Edited because I realize I got the context wrong. Not knowing the correct term doesn't make someone a prejudicial jerk. They just didn't know and didn't lurk around the boards to find out. Fine. There are many women around here who simply say "thanks for letting me know." Then there are the others who would rather argue the point because how dare someone correct them or they don't care to use the term correctly. There's a difference.
Your point is essentially, 'I know that I am right and you are wrong and the board would be more pleasant if everyone just accepted that.' Despite basically ignoring every comment I have made about the nuances and specifics of the transgendered community and why black and white views aren't always the best. You could have said, 'it seems like you're coming at this from a place where you care about the community but we've reached different viewpoints on how its important to support that community.' But instead you continue to try to just belittle my opinion and say that I'm overreacting...I could throw that back at you and ask why you are overreacting to me. I feel that conversations that actually delve into the issue are more constructive to promoting broad consciousness and awareness of the issue. And I feel that when people snidely correct people on a term without that context that you do more harm than good and it will turn people off, as you have turned me off despite essentially agreeing on the core issue of the importance of tolerance. I do not think I am projecting, I think the OP here was originally kind of piqued and have seen it across many threads. I am entitled to comment on it when I see it, you are entitled to disagree with my opinion.
I did not intend to call you a name, I apologize if the way I wrote that came off that way.
Seriously where did I say it didn't matter? Every one of my posts has emphasized that parents should be observing their children to ensure that they are loved and supported no matter who they are. This issue actually does have personal bearing on my life and in my family so this is not an abstract idea to me. GENDER is reflected in things like how you dress your children, and what 'behaviors' you encourage. While it is not the only thing, it IS frequently the outward manifestation of those inward ideas. You seem to want to villify me without actually listening to anything I am saying. I think when it comes to BABIES, this conversation is just not relevant and people work with the best knowledge they have and that shouldn't be shamed. It is lazy form of activism to say that making this distinction in the womb promotes acceptance when in reality it takes years of nurturing and paying attention to your children and being open to whoever they choose to be to ACTUALLY accept gender identity issues.
I think the point is that while the issue may not have a lot of bearing on a baby, you are speaking in a community where it may affect someone reading. So even though this isn't really yet a concept for a newborn, you (general you) are interchanging sex and gender TO people for which it may not be the same.
I understand that. I would hope that the way I have attempted to get my opinion across shows sensitivity to those communities. For the transgendered individual I know personally struggling with these issues, the two terms are not independant of one another. The discussion around gender is how individuals can use language to discuss how they feel their minds differ from their sex or from cultural norms expected of individuals with their sex, therefore, in early childhood, the distinction is less valuable. Personally, I feel that trying to inform new mothers of the fact that there is a possibility that a child might have gender issues and that they should be loving and supportive is more important than focusing attention onto a single word. When people are corrected on what they perceived as an innocent word choice, it tends to start that interaction off critically (interpreted as being told that they aren't tolerant or aware enough) and frequently the person will shut down or feel attacked. I would hope people in this community who have also been effected by the transgender community see that my point is that this just doesn't seem like the best way to convey the message of tolerance, and that pregnant women have a lot they worry about so if this isn't the best way, why add to the pile on?
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
Call it what you want. I didn't say anything that wasn't fact, therefore I feel very confident saying what I said. It's true. You're just sick of seeing it around the boards but that's literally your problem. Pointing out a simple correction shouldn't turn into a whole debate, especially since it's based on (again) fact. You're projecting your own feelings on the matter because no one is being guilted or shamed. One sentence to correct the term completely doesn't qualify. You're really overreacting over nothing. And name calling is always "klassy", good job. =D>
Edited because I realize I got the context wrong. Not knowing the correct term doesn't make someone a prejudicial jerk. They just didn't know and didn't lurk around the boards to find out. Fine. There are many women around here who simply say "thanks for letting me know." Then there are the others who would rather argue the point because how dare someone correct them or they don't care to use the term correctly. There's a difference.
Your point is essentially, 'I know that I am right and you are wrong and the board would be more pleasant if everyone just accepted that.' Despite basically ignoring every comment I have made about the nuances and specifics of the transgendered community and why black and white views aren't always the best. You could have said, 'it seems like you're coming at this from a place where you care about the community but we've reached different viewpoints on how its important to support that community.' But instead you continue to try to just belittle my opinion and say that I'm overreacting...I could throw that back at you and ask why you are overreacting to me. I feel that conversations that actually delve into the issue are more constructive to promoting broad consciousness and awareness of the issue. And I feel that when people snidely correct people on a term without that context that you do more harm than good and it will turn people off, as you have turned me off despite essentially agreeing on the core issue of the importance of tolerance. I do not think I am projecting, I think the OP here was originally kind of piqued and have seen it across many threads. I am entitled to comment on it when I see it, you are entitled to disagree with my opinion.
I did not intend to call you a name, I apologize if the way I wrote that came off that way.
This argument would almost work if I was the one who corrected OP. I wasn't, therefore this is moot. In this specific situation, yes I'm right and so is everyone else who corrected the OP. You most certainly are projecting something when you accuse people of attacking others maliciously when that never happened. You most certainly are projecting when you say people are made to feel guilty or shamed off of a one sentence correction. None of that happened. The OP asked about the distinction, and that's it. You assume I'm being snide or egotistical and that's all well and good. Doesn't mean your assumption is correct. I just literally don't get why you're arguing with me over something that is agreed on by both parties. You just want to argue with me because you don't like my delivery, which isn't my problem.
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
Call it what you want. I didn't say anything that wasn't fact, therefore I feel very confident saying what I said. It's true. You're just sick of seeing it around the boards but that's literally your problem. Pointing out a simple correction shouldn't turn into a whole debate, especially since it's based on (again) fact. You're projecting your own feelings on the matter because no one is being guilted or shamed. One sentence to correct the term completely doesn't qualify. You're really overreacting over nothing. And name calling is always "klassy", good job. =D>
Edited because I realize I got the context wrong. Not knowing the correct term doesn't make someone a prejudicial jerk. They just didn't know and didn't lurk around the boards to find out. Fine. There are many women around here who simply say "thanks for letting me know." Then there are the others who would rather argue the point because how dare someone correct them or they don't care to use the term correctly. There's a difference.
Your point is essentially, 'I know that I am right and you are wrong and the board would be more pleasant if everyone just accepted that.' Despite basically ignoring every comment I have made about the nuances and specifics of the transgendered community and why black and white views aren't always the best. You could have said, 'it seems like you're coming at this from a place where you care about the community but we've reached different viewpoints on how its important to support that community.' But instead you continue to try to just belittle my opinion and say that I'm overreacting...I could throw that back at you and ask why you are overreacting to me. I feel that conversations that actually delve into the issue are more constructive to promoting broad consciousness and awareness of the issue. And I feel that when people snidely correct people on a term without that context that you do more harm than good and it will turn people off, as you have turned me off despite essentially agreeing on the core issue of the importance of tolerance. I do not think I am projecting, I think the OP here was originally kind of piqued and have seen it across many threads. I am entitled to comment on it when I see it, you are entitled to disagree with my opinion.
I did not intend to call you a name, I apologize if the way I wrote that came off that way.
This argument would almost work if I was the one who corrected OP. I wasn't, therefore this is moot. In this specific situation, yes I'm right and so is everyone else who corrected the OP. You most certainly are projecting something when you accuse people of attacking others maliciously when that never happened. You most certainly are projecting when you say people are made to feel guilty or shamed off of a one sentence correction. None of that happened. The OP asked about the distinction, and that's it. You assume I'm being snide or egotistical and that's all well and good. Doesn't mean your assumption is correct. I just literally don't get why you're arguing with me over something that is agreed on by both parties. You just want to argue with me because you don't like my delivery, which isn't my problem.
Ok? You are right, I feel condescended to and criticized by your delivery. You clearly also don't like my delivery because you are arguing with me too?
The OP 'liked' my first couple of posts so I don't think I am misreading her pique, and her response to being corrected was to say that that was the term her doctor used which is why she used it which seemed defensive to me, as if she felt attacked. You say I am making assumptions, and perhaps I am, but you are too (about me if no one else). And I am responding to you because you engaged in the discussion. Is critiquing this issue with you somehow invalid because you were not the person who initiated the correction in this particular thread? Because I literally don't understand why you want to argue about whether or not we should be arguing. If people have two differing opinions on a message board...they go back and forth due to the nature of a message board.
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
Call it what you want. I didn't say anything that wasn't fact, therefore I feel very confident saying what I said. It's true. You're just sick of seeing it around the boards but that's literally your problem. Pointing out a simple correction shouldn't turn into a whole debate, especially since it's based on (again) fact. You're projecting your own feelings on the matter because no one is being guilted or shamed. One sentence to correct the term completely doesn't qualify. You're really overreacting over nothing. And name calling is always "klassy", good job. =D>
Edited because I realize I got the context wrong. Not knowing the correct term doesn't make someone a prejudicial jerk. They just didn't know and didn't lurk around the boards to find out. Fine. There are many women around here who simply say "thanks for letting me know." Then there are the others who would rather argue the point because how dare someone correct them or they don't care to use the term correctly. There's a difference.
Your point is essentially, 'I know that I am right and you are wrong and the board would be more pleasant if everyone just accepted that.' Despite basically ignoring every comment I have made about the nuances and specifics of the transgendered community and why black and white views aren't always the best. You could have said, 'it seems like you're coming at this from a place where you care about the community but we've reached different viewpoints on how its important to support that community.' But instead you continue to try to just belittle my opinion and say that I'm overreacting...I could throw that back at you and ask why you are overreacting to me. I feel that conversations that actually delve into the issue are more constructive to promoting broad consciousness and awareness of the issue. And I feel that when people snidely correct people on a term without that context that you do more harm than good and it will turn people off, as you have turned me off despite essentially agreeing on the core issue of the importance of tolerance. I do not think I am projecting, I think the OP here was originally kind of piqued and have seen it across many threads. I am entitled to comment on it when I see it, you are entitled to disagree with my opinion.
I did not intend to call you a name, I apologize if the way I wrote that came off that way.
This argument would almost work if I was the one who corrected OP. I wasn't, therefore this is moot. In this specific situation, yes I'm right and so is everyone else who corrected the OP. You most certainly are projecting something when you accuse people of attacking others maliciously when that never happened. You most certainly are projecting when you say people are made to feel guilty or shamed off of a one sentence correction. None of that happened. The OP asked about the distinction, and that's it. You assume I'm being snide or egotistical and that's all well and good. Doesn't mean your assumption is correct. I just literally don't get why you're arguing with me over something that is agreed on by both parties. You just want to argue with me because you don't like my delivery, which isn't my problem.
Ok? You are right, I feel condescended to and criticized by your delivery. You clearly also don't like my delivery because you are arguing with me too?
The OP 'liked' my first couple of posts so I don't think I am misreading her pique, and her response to being corrected was to say that that was the term her doctor used which is why she used it which seemed defensive to me, as if she felt attacked. You say I am making assumptions, and perhaps I am, but you are too (about me if no one else). And I am responding to you because you engaged in the discussion. Is critiquing this issue with you somehow invalid because you were not the person who initiated the correction in this particular thread? Because I literally don't understand why you want to argue about whether or not we should be arguing. If people have two differing opinions on a message board...they go back and forth due to the nature of a message board.
I'm not bothered by your delivery. I'm bothered by the incorrect use of the words gender and sex.
Your point was invalid because you said my delivery is what's keeping OP from hearing my point. I wasn't the one who pointed it out so no, my delivery has nothing to do with OP.
Here's what bothered me:
1. Telling people the distinction between the two words doesn't matter.
2. Acting like no one should ever correct a pregnant woman.
3. Making up situations that never happened. (Especially this)
And that's why I engaged. When I say that I don't get why this is an argument, that's because essentially you agree with the facts. We're for the same thing......relatively. So really you were trying to be a WK because you didn't like the tone of the comments from the posters who corrected the OP. And because of that, you keep arguing against the facts when it's the tone that was the real issue. I don't get that at all.
And the ego to say "accept the correction and move on.' I don't know why you think you are the moral arbiter of the bump 2nd tri but that's thinking quite highly of yourself. Some people have critical thinking skills and do know what they're saying and are not prejudicial jerks.
Call it what you want. I didn't say anything that wasn't fact, therefore I feel very confident saying what I said. It's true. You're just sick of seeing it around the boards but that's literally your problem. Pointing out a simple correction shouldn't turn into a whole debate, especially since it's based on (again) fact. You're projecting your own feelings on the matter because no one is being guilted or shamed. One sentence to correct the term completely doesn't qualify. You're really overreacting over nothing. And name calling is always "klassy", good job. =D>
Edited because I realize I got the context wrong. Not knowing the correct term doesn't make someone a prejudicial jerk. They just didn't know and didn't lurk around the boards to find out. Fine. There are many women around here who simply say "thanks for letting me know." Then there are the others who would rather argue the point because how dare someone correct them or they don't care to use the term correctly. There's a difference.
Your point is essentially, 'I know that I am right and you are wrong and the board would be more pleasant if everyone just accepted that.' Despite basically ignoring every comment I have made about the nuances and specifics of the transgendered community and why black and white views aren't always the best. You could have said, 'it seems like you're coming at this from a place where you care about the community but we've reached different viewpoints on how its important to support that community.' But instead you continue to try to just belittle my opinion and say that I'm overreacting...I could throw that back at you and ask why you are overreacting to me. I feel that conversations that actually delve into the issue are more constructive to promoting broad consciousness and awareness of the issue. And I feel that when people snidely correct people on a term without that context that you do more harm than good and it will turn people off, as you have turned me off despite essentially agreeing on the core issue of the importance of tolerance. I do not think I am projecting, I think the OP here was originally kind of piqued and have seen it across many threads. I am entitled to comment on it when I see it, you are entitled to disagree with my opinion.
I did not intend to call you a name, I apologize if the way I wrote that came off that way.
This argument would almost work if I was the one who corrected OP. I wasn't, therefore this is moot. In this specific situation, yes I'm right and so is everyone else who corrected the OP. You most certainly are projecting something when you accuse people of attacking others maliciously when that never happened. You most certainly are projecting when you say people are made to feel guilty or shamed off of a one sentence correction. None of that happened. The OP asked about the distinction, and that's it. You assume I'm being snide or egotistical and that's all well and good. Doesn't mean your assumption is correct. I just literally don't get why you're arguing with me over something that is agreed on by both parties. You just want to argue with me because you don't like my delivery, which isn't my problem.
Ok? You are right, I feel condescended to and criticized by your delivery. You clearly also don't like my delivery because you are arguing with me too?
The OP 'liked' my first couple of posts so I don't think I am misreading her pique, and her response to being corrected was to say that that was the term her doctor used which is why she used it which seemed defensive to me, as if she felt attacked. You say I am making assumptions, and perhaps I am, but you are too (about me if no one else). And I am responding to you because you engaged in the discussion. Is critiquing this issue with you somehow invalid because you were not the person who initiated the correction in this particular thread? Because I literally don't understand why you want to argue about whether or not we should be arguing. If people have two differing opinions on a message board...they go back and forth due to the nature of a message board.
I'm not bothered by your delivery. I'm bothered by the incorrect use of the words gender and sex.
Your point was invalid because you said my delivery is what's keeping OP from hearing my point. I wasn't the one who pointed it out so no, my delivery has nothing to do with OP.
Here's what bothered me:
1. Telling people the distinction between the two words doesn't matter.
2. Acting like no one should ever correct a pregnant woman.
3. Making up situations that never happened. (Especially this)
And that's why I engaged. When I say that I don't get why this is an argument, that's because essentially you agree with the facts. We're for the same thing......relatively. So really you were trying to be a WK because you didn't like the tone of the comments from the posters who corrected the OP. And because of that, you keep arguing against the facts when it's the tone that was the real issue. I don't get that at all.
Ok. I believe you have in fact misunderstood my issue (or straight up don't agree with it which is certainly your right)
My general argument is against a trend I have noticed across the boards of people doing this. And that the tone with which this correction is delivered frequently seems to not be received well. Not necessarily specifically when YOU delivery the message, just generally where I have seen it delivered. this thread included. My original post was not directed at you, you stepped in to defend the original corrector which is why I'm talking to you and not to that person. This is a subjective opinion, but it is what I think. Re: your general points:
1) You are saying I am arguing that the disctinction between the two words doesn't matter. I don't believe that the distinction matters in infancy or early childhood, so that is accurate. My secondary argument is that as people age, while there is a difference between the words, there is not as much of one as you believe there is. I think you are separating them completely when it is not that simple of an issue. The fact that there are blurred lines between gender and sex and that the terms are intertwined in a fundamental way is not controversial. I think there is a lot more nuance to the issue, and therefore that makes making the terminology the battle ground both ineffective and possibly missing the point. I also think that when people switch to 'I'm having a boy/girl' they are essentially making the exact same linguistic slight you see in the gender conversation, but that those are seen as innocent and understandable, which I think is unfair.I think we disagree here, which is fine, but I do not believe my opinion is prejudiced nor am I the only one to have it. So telling me over and over that this is a simple fact and I'm wrong came off as very dismissive. I have put a lot of thought into this, I have more than casual thoughts and opinions on the subject that have taken into account the experience and emotions of the trans population. That doesn't mean I am an expert, but engaging people in a thoughtful conversation when people are coming from a positive place (positive place in this context meaning supportive of the transgendered population or seeking deeper understanding) is better than being dismissive just because you have come to different conclusions.
2) People can correct pregnant women when they are wrong, obviously. I don't think they should correct them in ways that make the corrector seem superior, which is how I frequently read the corrections that are made on this issue. I also, due to the views I just said up in number 1, think this is a more complicated issue and therefore don't really see this as a correction but more an imposition of one person/group's beliefs on how best to be politically correct and sensitive in regards to a certain population. I don't see this particular distinction as black and white. Had the woman said, 'transgender people don't really exist' or 'transgendered people don't deserve respect' than I would say yes, correct away. Language, particularly around this subject, is confusing and difficult to navigate. I think trying to see where a person is coming from on the issue is more helpful than the standard issue, sex =/= gender one off that gets tossed off here.
3) I don't know what you're talking about. I responded to you, I didn't target you. My interpretation of how people respond to this question could be wrong but I'm not making things up.
Re: Found out the Gender!!!
Also, just an internet safety tip, you may want to remove your child's full name from your post. There are a lot of weirdos out there and anyone can read these forums. ETA: Just realized your last name is also in your username. You can ask an admin to change that for you.
DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
ETA What's scary about the difference between gender and sex?
I'm sure it's a lot easier to post a gif and make the op feel like crap than it is to think critically.
Even if there was a citation how many trans people do you think actually provide honest information in these statistics? Being transgendered is still not widely accepted especially if not in countries that are more liberal.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-we-dont-know-the-size-of-the-transgender-population/
OP, congrats on finding out the sex <:-P
My sex is female, but my choices in clothes, activities, friends or whatever are typical of my persona, not an assigned gender role. In so many situations in life I have been judged based on society's assumption about me according to a stereotypical gender.
I think we can give our children something better. And that starts with separating the physical sex from gender roles.
DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
For all of you who love to give people a hard time, let me ask.... After you discovered the sex of your baby did you go out and get gender neutral clothes and nursery items for your little one?
This whole becoming a parent has been as exciting as it has been stressful. I don't think we need to add this whole gender identity business to it all's
We found out we're having a bit too!!! We are super excited about our little guy. I've gone out and started getting all sorts of boy stuff. My husband and I are going to assume our baby boy is masculine. If he shows any signs that he is not then we will change course.
Also, this might be where some of the confusion is coming from..
(got this from Webster's)
gen·der
\ˈjen-dər\
noun
: the state of being male or female
grammar : one of the categories (masculine, feminine, and neuter)
Just because a group is in the minority doesn't at all mean that the issues they face aren't valid. And just because you specifically may understand the implication, that doesn't mean that everyone reading this will know and may end up taking it literally. It's always better to spread knowledge instead of fostering ignorance.
When someone posts here that they are having a boy or a girl people say 'congratulations on your x!' They do not say, 'you cannot know for sure if it is a boy or a girl or if it will be confused and maybe lie somewhere in between because gender identity issues can arise.' But everyone DOES jump on people when they say gender instead of sex. I am very confused as to why this is because I don't see the distinction.
This is because gender identity issues are extremely complex and rarely fall on a black and white spectrum. For the vast majority of women, the result they get from their doctor while pregnant will be reflected in both the gentalia and the personality of the child they raise (with I would hope obvious notes that girls can like monster trucks and boys can like barbies and still feel like the girls and boys they identify as). And for a significant amount of transgendered people this distinction falls a bit flat as well I imgaine because they DO feel like the opposite gender and frequently take surgical steps to ensure their 'sex' (at least sexual organs since chromosomes cannot be altered) does match up with their self identified gender.
I don't know what you read into any of my posts that implied that I felt that the trans population's issues and feelings are not valid. I just do not understand how ensuring pregnant women don't slip up on a linguistic techincality is really advocating for trans awareness. Ensuring parents know that this is something their child can face and that it is a real thing that they should embrace and support is critical. But for the baby years, there's really no way to know, so parents proceed the only way they know how. I don't think parents should feel preemptively like they are prejudiced because they work with the information they have at hand until different information presents itself. Generally opposed to all versions of 'mommy shaming' which, personally, is how I read the constant correction of terms that were said innocently. I think its a way to say 'you're not as accepting of a mom as I am, better shape up!'
DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
Gender DOES matter to many people. Just because it has no bearing in your life doesn't mean it's not important. That's like someone who has never experienced racism to tell someone who has that their experiences don't matter because it doesn't happen to everyone so no need to concern yourself over it. This isn't an abstract idea. It's not hard to understand.
And this was not done because of being PC to transgendered people (although I am, and if DS is transgendered. Awesome. We'll support him). This was done because I don't believe in gender stereotypes. "Boy" toys can reach girls about mechanics (among other things) and "girl toys" can reach boys empathy. I want him to find what he likes and not be held back. He could be the most stereotypical boy in the world - as long as he has had the opportunity to explore what he likes and identifies with.
I guess it's because I don't like being stereotyped because I am female (or anything else), so I don't want my son to have that as well.
I am happy for you that you think the world is not as scary as people think, but I also hope for your safety as well as the safety of your unborn child that you come out of your bubble and see reality. Watch the news recently? Did you miss the story about the woman in Colorado who responded to a Craigslist add for baby stuff and had her baby cut out of her? I am 32, by the time I was 16 I knew 3 people who were kidnapped - 1 of the 3 survived, the other 2 were murdered, and I grew up in a nice area.
I personally think gender is essentially interchangeable with sex for the first few years because the sex governs how most people make initial decisions (like names and clothes) and so it's not worth making someone feel bad over, and I've seen people be made to feel bad about this mistake over and over here. And it's called a gender identity issue for a reason. The problem presents when a person feels that their gender does not match their sex. Separating the terms with such a strict line diminishes the Transgender person by supposing that those differences don't matter to them when they are in fact generally the core issue at hand.
As you have said in other threads, if you post your opinion in a public forum then you don't get to choose who responds and with what opinions. I feel strongly about making pregnant women feel guilty, particularly on issues that they won't even be confronting for years.
I agree you should not let fear paralyze you or completely run your life, but I also think that you should be smart about things and not make it easy for people to prey on you. For example, I am a firm believer that no one should post on Facebook that they are on vacation - that is asking for your house to get broken into. I also don't believe OP (or anyone else on here, I see it all of the time) should post their personal information. In fact, it is in the guidelines that you should not. If there is a wacko out there looking to prey on pregnant women, where would they go to first? A pregnancy forum. It is all about being smart so you don't become a victim.
Are pregnant women now fragile little butterflies that can't handle learning something new? Are pregnant women going to break apart if someone corrects them? Seriously, get off it. The "zomg I'm pregnant" excuse has long been played out. If you're not strong enough to handle responses on the Internet and feelings get hurt oh so easily then this isn't the place for you.
And while you are correct that the definition of sex and gender is a fact that cannot be debated, there is actually a lot of conversation and debate in the trans and scientific community about whether there is concrete value in the separation of the terms due to the inherent nature of how they depend upon each other and work together. Even the Wikipedia article could tell you that (also research papers and journals and the American psychological association). Like I said before, lazy activism. You want to throw out a pretentious correction every time someone posts this on a thread despite what seems to me like zero nuanced knowledge about the issues at hand.
I suppose she didn't get attacked, this was mostly the straw that broke the camels back seeing this happen on thread after thread after thread and confused ops feeling bad or attacked.
DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
I do not believe I am a prejudicial jerk.
Edited because I realize I got the context wrong.
Not knowing the correct term doesn't make someone a prejudicial jerk. They just didn't know and didn't lurk around the boards to find out. Fine. There are many women around here who simply say "thanks for letting me know." Then there are the others who would rather argue the point because how dare someone correct them or they don't care to use the term correctly. There's a difference.
Your point is essentially, 'I know that I am right and you are wrong and the board would be more pleasant if everyone just accepted that.' Despite basically ignoring every comment I have made about the nuances and specifics of the transgendered community and why black and white views aren't always the best. You could have said, 'it seems like you're coming at this from a place where you care about the community but we've reached different viewpoints on how its important to support that community.' But instead you continue to try to just belittle my opinion and say that I'm overreacting...I could throw that back at you and ask why you are overreacting to me. I feel that conversations that actually delve into the issue are more constructive to promoting broad consciousness and awareness of the issue. And I feel that when people snidely correct people on a term without that context that you do more harm than good and it will turn people off, as you have turned me off despite essentially agreeing on the core issue of the importance of tolerance. I do not think I am projecting, I think the OP here was originally kind of piqued and have seen it across many threads. I am entitled to comment on it when I see it, you are entitled to disagree with my opinion.
I did not intend to call you a name, I apologize if the way I wrote that came off that way.
Ok? You are right, I feel condescended to and criticized by your delivery. You clearly also don't like my delivery because you are arguing with me too?
The OP 'liked' my first couple of posts so I don't think I am misreading her pique, and her response to being corrected was to say that that was the term her doctor used which is why she used it which seemed defensive to me, as if she felt attacked. You say I am making assumptions, and perhaps I am, but you are too (about me if no one else). And I am responding to you because you engaged in the discussion. Is critiquing this issue with you somehow invalid because you were not the person who initiated the correction in this particular thread? Because I literally don't understand why you want to argue about whether or not we should be arguing. If people have two differing opinions on a message board...they go back and forth due to the nature of a message board.
Your point was invalid because you said my delivery is what's keeping OP from hearing my point. I wasn't the one who pointed it out so no, my delivery has nothing to do with OP.
Here's what bothered me:
1. Telling people the distinction between the two words doesn't matter.
2. Acting like no one should ever correct a pregnant woman.
3. Making up situations that never happened. (Especially this)
And that's why I engaged. When I say that I don't get why this is an argument, that's because essentially you agree with the facts. We're for the same thing......relatively. So really you were trying to be a WK because you didn't like the tone of the comments from the posters who corrected the OP. And because of that, you keep arguing against the facts when it's the tone that was the real issue. I don't get that at all.
Ok. I believe you have in fact misunderstood my issue (or straight up don't agree with it which is certainly your right)
My general argument is against a trend I have noticed across the boards of people doing this. And that the tone with which this correction is delivered frequently seems to not be received well. Not necessarily specifically when YOU delivery the message, just generally where I have seen it delivered. this thread included. My original post was not directed at you, you stepped in to defend the original corrector which is why I'm talking to you and not to that person. This is a subjective opinion, but it is what I think. Re: your general points:
1) You are saying I am arguing that the disctinction between the two words doesn't matter. I don't believe that the distinction matters in infancy or early childhood, so that is accurate. My secondary argument is that as people age, while there is a difference between the words, there is not as much of one as you believe there is. I think you are separating them completely when it is not that simple of an issue. The fact that there are blurred lines between gender and sex and that the terms are intertwined in a fundamental way is not controversial. I think there is a lot more nuance to the issue, and therefore that makes making the terminology the battle ground both ineffective and possibly missing the point. I also think that when people switch to 'I'm having a boy/girl' they are essentially making the exact same linguistic slight you see in the gender conversation, but that those are seen as innocent and understandable, which I think is unfair.I think we disagree here, which is fine, but I do not believe my opinion is prejudiced nor am I the only one to have it. So telling me over and over that this is a simple fact and I'm wrong came off as very dismissive. I have put a lot of thought into this, I have more than casual thoughts and opinions on the subject that have taken into account the experience and emotions of the trans population. That doesn't mean I am an expert, but engaging people in a thoughtful conversation when people are coming from a positive place (positive place in this context meaning supportive of the transgendered population or seeking deeper understanding) is better than being dismissive just because you have come to different conclusions.
2) People can correct pregnant women when they are wrong, obviously. I don't think they should correct them in ways that make the corrector seem superior, which is how I frequently read the corrections that are made on this issue. I also, due to the views I just said up in number 1, think this is a more complicated issue and therefore don't really see this as a correction but more an imposition of one person/group's beliefs on how best to be politically correct and sensitive in regards to a certain population. I don't see this particular distinction as black and white. Had the woman said, 'transgender people don't really exist' or 'transgendered people don't deserve respect' than I would say yes, correct away. Language, particularly around this subject, is confusing and difficult to navigate. I think trying to see where a person is coming from on the issue is more helpful than the standard issue, sex =/= gender one off that gets tossed off here.
3) I don't know what you're talking about. I responded to you, I didn't target you. My interpretation of how people respond to this question could be wrong but I'm not making things up.