I'm a sahm. Dd1 was born in August about 2 weeks after the cut off for school enrollment. I decided that since I would be home with dd2 anyways I would keep dd1 home with me and do just one year of pre-k and then she would be in kindergarten right when she turns 6.
My problem is I have a lot of people telling me I'm wrong for not trying to send her earlier. They keep telling me if I sent her for 2 years of pre-k that they will go ahead and let her move up, or that I can have her tested in. I just keep wondering why they are trying to push me into this. I don't want to send her yet, and I'm not technically holding her back, so what's the big deal?
She isn't just sitting around the house doing nothing. She knows the alphabet and can identify them and her numbers and we read daily. I just feel like I'm doing something wrong:( Is their anyone around here who has a child that started kindergarten at 6 instead of 5? Am I hurting her by waiting?
Re: need some outside opinions.
Married DH 7/30/11
CSC arrived 5/7/12
CHC arrived 6/2/14
It was a nightmare. #scarred4lyfe
bfp#4 3/19/2014 edd 12/1/2014 please let this be the one!
beta @ 5w0d = 12,026! u/s 4/22/14 @ 8w1d it's twins!
Even later on I think it can be a benefit to be a year older. At least if you wait, your child will be an adult rather than a minor if/when they go off to college. I know most college students still have a lot of maturing to do anyway, even at 21, but I am sure an extra year could help in some cases.
It's hard when people are getting on you and making you question your decisions. Stay strong and know that you know what is best!