s/o the post about the three babies removed from their parent's care...
What would you do if CPS knocked on your door and wanted immediate access to your home and your children? Would you let them in right away and give them full access to your home and family?
I have no reason to believe this would ever happen to us, but I've definitely thought through what I might do. I'm curious what others would do.
Re: if CPS came calling
I guess I was taking this as a hypothetical/office mistake question. As far as I know, I've never given anyone a reason totalk to CPS about my children. So If out if the blue they showed up due to some mistake or misunderstanding, I would be confused, miffed, and very upset, but I don't think I would fight them on it.
When DS wiggled off of DH's arm his first day home from the hospital they were on us like white on rice even though it was an absolute FREAK accident. Not the stress I'd ever want to experience again especially considering I had just left the hospital myself the night before too (I knew immediately what was happening, took DH a while - but had it 100% figured out when I told him "We ARE NOT leaving DS alone for a second while here!". It was bad enough we were there for a freak accident, but you pile on top of that CPS and the staff investigating your butt at every turn and blink. It was beyond a nightmare. Then DD fell on a piece of playground equipment at school a few weeks later <face palm> (they couldn't figure out why I was "HERE'S THE NURSES REPORT FROM SCHOOL!!! even if that's not jiving with DD's story" - but of course they won't go investigate negligence at a school..
Team Warrant - this isn't the Gestapo, "If you have nothing to hide.." yada yada. Too often in this country people are willing to give up basic freedoms.
Edit: I also wanted to add that no matter how you react or what comes of it, there is a record. Cooperation on unfounded concerns the first time could lead to less likely involvement the second. Refusal from the start raises concerns and could mean more involvement.
bfp#1-10/29/12,EDD: 7/3/13. nothing found @ 1st u/s, natural mc 12/10/12. "Bean"
bfp#2-5/10/13! EDD: 1/18/14. "Peanut" Arrived 1/13/14. Diagnosed with Cystic Fibrosis
bfp#3- 9/26/14. EDD: 5/7/15. no heartbeat found @ 1st u/s, natural mc 10/23/14. "Little Bug"
**Psalm 139:16**
They can correct me if I am wrong, but some of the PPs definitely came across as saying that refusal even if they didn't have a warrant was suspicious.
I think you missed the part where someone said if they are coming into your home they already have a warrant. I'm sure asking to see it isn't seen as refusal. Refusing them entry and being rude after seeing the warrant is of course seen as suspicious behavior.
I know all states work differently, but where I am, the process starts as voluntary. We'd contact you, ask for a meeting, ask to meet the kids (unless the reports indicates more risk with that kind of notice). We'd interview the people living in the home and ask for releases to speak to other key players. After talking to everyone, the cps worker and supervisor put it all together like a puzzle and decide what to do next.
Just like in any line of work, there is a paper trail, so if a concern showed up then something had to happen to address that concern.
I never got a warrant to enter a home(maybe I was just good at sweet talking my way in), if I was filing for anything it was for custody of the kids. And only after I had done my work to establish the reality of the concerns.
I have seen court orders for co-operation for certain things to happen (someone move out of the home, addiction treatment, etc).
I will say that yes, if I couldn't get into a home to do my job, I would be more concerned for those kids than the ones who let me in without a fight. In my limited experience(less than 2 years), those were the families that were hiding something.
I often discussed with families that everyone wants the truly abused kids to be rescued, no one argues that. In order to find them, CPS has to be able to do the work. Cooperation on a bogus case will let them move on to the next 10x faster than dragging everyone through court to find out no problem existed. They have to find out one way or another.
bfp#1-10/29/12,EDD: 7/3/13. nothing found @ 1st u/s, natural mc 12/10/12. "Bean"
bfp#2-5/10/13! EDD: 1/18/14. "Peanut" Arrived 1/13/14. Diagnosed with Cystic Fibrosis
bfp#3- 9/26/14. EDD: 5/7/15. no heartbeat found @ 1st u/s, natural mc 10/23/14. "Little Bug"
**Psalm 139:16**
After reading all the responses and thinking about it, this would probably be my approach too.
C 7.16.2008 | L 11.12.2010 | A 3.18.2013
You're welcome, I didn't last at it long. There's a huge burn out rate in that field.
I think it's only natural to fear what we don't understand. Not many people know how the actual cps process works unless they've experienced it. So it's easy to fear it and make assumptions about what it is like. I found when parents were facing the reality of an investigation, unless the problem was big, it wasn't as scary as they anticipated, and we could work together well to end it quicky.
bfp#1-10/29/12,EDD: 7/3/13. nothing found @ 1st u/s, natural mc 12/10/12. "Bean"
bfp#2-5/10/13! EDD: 1/18/14. "Peanut" Arrived 1/13/14. Diagnosed with Cystic Fibrosis
bfp#3- 9/26/14. EDD: 5/7/15. no heartbeat found @ 1st u/s, natural mc 10/23/14. "Little Bug"
**Psalm 139:16**