Stay at Home Moms

@andrewsgal - you have multiple PMs from me. Tagging here b/c I know you are mobile ;)

2

Re: @andrewsgal - you have multiple PMs from me. Tagging here b/c I know you are mobile ;)

  • I am still baffled that the shit KC posts is like a million times more offensive. I mean she called my kids mindless drones FFS. But I tell CJ to fuck off and later apologize and I am the one on the banning block. This is a weird day.

    I didn't call your kids mindless drones. When you told me I was raising an asshole, I said I'd rather raise assholes than mindless drones that aren't allowed to ask questions. That's not calling your kid a mindless drone. I'm seriously lmfao that you're whining that you got ratted out then try to get me in trouble though. Holy irony, batman.

    I am not trying to get you in trouble. I am pointing out curlings hypocrisy.
  • Loading the player...
  • What board is she supposed to mod?

    This is what I was wondering. When I saw she was a mod (on mobile pretty much always) I just assumed it was a SAHM mod.
    BFP #1: DD born on 08.25.12 BFP #2: 09/08/15 miscarried at 6w BFP #3: DD2 born on 02.07.17
  • What board is she supposed to mod?
    September 13
    Married: 8.5.12
    Bunny: 10.9.13
    Jellybean #2 Due: 2.1.16

    F16 July Siggy Challenge: Favorite Summer Activity
    Hiking and Baseball Games with the Fam
    image  image

    imageimageimage

    image




  • I am still baffled that the shit KC posts is like a million times more offensive. I mean she called my kids mindless drones FFS. But I tell CJ to fuck off and later apologize and I am the one on the banning block. This is a weird day.



    I didn't call your kids mindless drones. When you told me I was raising an asshole, I said I'd rather raise assholes than mindless drones that aren't allowed to ask questions. That's not calling your kid a mindless drone. I'm seriously lmfao that you're whining that you got ratted out then try to get me in trouble though. Holy irony, batman.


    I am not trying to get you in trouble. I am pointing out curlings hypocrisy.

    No there's really no hypocrisy there. What I said isn't even close to a direct attack. I agree with the masses here curling way overstepped in getting you in trouble. It's just not remotely comparable to what I said at all.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • I was just reading a post on parenting about the fact that you shouldn't get a warming if the "victim" doesn't complain.
  • Kate and Rora as co-mods.

    make it happen.

    I thought for sure a MOD would have come in here by now! WTF?

    And what are proboards?
  • This is unbelievable, such bullshit.

    But a part of me hopes it all blows up with a mass exodus because I would love to see everyone unload. Oh and I am totally with everyone if we jump ship to proboards
    image
    DS 3.12.08
    DD 7.11.09
    DD 8.01.13
  • Waves HI to @CurlingRocks‌ I see you were active 10 minutes ago. Way to have enough balls to tattle but not enough to face the music.
  • Kimbus22 said:
    The funniest part of this is that the banning is decided by the mods.  I mean, TB has a very strenuous process to become a mod.  It's not like you can spend your time chilling out with child molesters or sending dick pics and still get the mod power. 

    Oh wait....

    (@mandymak I haz nothin but luv 4 u)

    OMG this is awesome. Serious question since curling likes to be all up in everyone's business does this mean she could block me like now? Mods having blocking power is seriously fucked up.
  • auroraloo said:
    I was just reading a post on parenting about the fact that you shouldn't get a warming if the "victim" doesn't complain.
    I disagree with this. That's like saying if a domestic violence victim recants the prosecutor shouldn't be able to charge the case. (on another level, but same idea) nope.

    Curling was originally the preemies mod, actually, she just got added to s13 because she was already a mod.

    I have to go to work now, play nice people.

    Is this a joke? Love you rora but you seriously just compared me telling CJ to fuck off to domestic violence. You are way way out of line.
  • But per BJ, "fuck off" is okay and "fuck you" is not. I have this in a PM from a mod as well as posted on M15.

    That is per @bumpjackie. So @curlingrocks and @mandymak need to check themselves. 

    So I really only have 2 warnings since two of them were for fuck off?
  • Pretty sure that CJ is a big girl and can decide for herself that she doesn't want AG to get an abuse point because they already solved this shit before any mod ever got in between them.

    CJ is not constantly abused by AG. This isn't even close to being the same thing. If people seriously can't chose whether or not something hurt their feelings and whether or not they want that person to get abuse points on their accounts, then they need to just slowly back away from the interwebz.
    BFP #1: DD born on 08.25.12 BFP #2: 09/08/15 miscarried at 6w BFP #3: DD2 born on 02.07.17
  • Hey @colerose @northport6 How do we get a BG to pay attention to us since nobody else is? We need answers.
  • auroraloo said:
    FFS, AG, I specifically said, it's not on the same level, but it's the same idea. And I was talking about the bigot comment, not you telling Cj anything, so stop reading into it, it wasn't about you at all.

    You break the rules, you get in trouble, regardless of "victim" reporting, that's all I was saying. You should know me better than to think I was saying they were the same thing. For fuck's sake.

    You use pot, you get caught, you get in trouble, period. It doesn't matter whether or not you THINK it should be legal, it isn't, and you broke the law.

    You speed, you get caught, you get in trouble. It doesn't matter if you were driving safely, you broke the law.

    You name-call, someone reports it, you get in trouble, period. Doesn't matter who did it, or who "tattled" if it's against TOU, you risked it.

    Saying "fuck off" is not against TOU, so what AG is claiming I'm comparing doesn't even come into play in this comparison. Setlle down.

    Well I guess there was a miscommunication because I was talking bout CJ and you replied off of that, I still think that in order for something to be a violation of TOS the person really needs to feel victimized. FFS I could tell @notkateanymore‌ to fuck off because her football team beat mine (except that never happened) ;) and no I don think I should be banned for college football banter. For the record I did not tell her to fuck off I was posting an example.
  • auroraloo said:
    I'm super disappointed that people here are complaining about "tattling" I said it before when Hav did it. You don't want someone to "tattle" DON'T BREAK THE FUCKING RULES whether or not you agree with them. The whining is just as, if not more immature. Jesus Christ.

    BUT NO ONE KNOWS IF I BROKE THE RULES. WHY ARE WE YELLING? Tattling is still ridiculous as adults.
  • CnAmom said:
    I just realized that not too long ago I called you people a bunch of assholes and not one of you reported me.

    @CurlingRocks‌ must have missed that.
  • But @auroraloo‌ I got told on for the fuck off not bigot, you are confusing me today.
  • CnAmom said:
    Is there a statute of limitations on reporting? Because she might come back and try.

    You are screwed. Go back and delete quickly!
  • Thanks @colerose

    @auroraloo I get the whole "if you do something wrong and get caught, don't bitch" BUT being told on is just too fucking much. 
  • Off to the book fair then a restaurant I hate because they have a PLAYGROUND and BEER!
  • Seriously...no @mandymack or @curlingrocks? They started this shitshow...they could at least show up.
  • Hello everyone,

    I'm on the West Coast and my was leading Reading Group as I do every week at my daughter's school -  I have only been home an hour. I had to first answer to Bump Jackie and the entire Mods board as well as get my ass chewed in PMs before I could even come here and see what was being reported about me. I still need to read through these 7 pages.

    I would really appreciate the time to do so so that I may fully understand your grievances and reply thoughtfully.

    eclaire 9.10.06  diggy 6.2.11

  • I'll save you the trouble...people are pissed off.
  • Here's the thing. I rarely lurk, post even more rarely and even I could have told you calling AG out  and airing all of this in a public post was a terrible idea for the board. 
    Gabriel 11/04/09 Vincent 9/17/11 Grace 8/02/13
  • Let me clarify to stop any further comments: no other Mod is chewing me out or upset with me but as the Mod of this board, I'm responsible so I have a lot to answer for.

    @chelseymat - I'm not sure if this is what you meant to say but I tagged @andrewsgal in a post because she's mobile 99% of the time and hadn't replied to several PMs from me in a few days and I needed something from her. "You've got PM" posts aren't because anyone is in trouble, necessarily. :)  And I aired nothing.

    eclaire 9.10.06  diggy 6.2.11

  • OK maybe I should clarify. I don't think AG was upset about being paged and I understand how paging works I'm just saying no one should be surprised this is 7 pages and people are pissed.
    Gabriel 11/04/09 Vincent 9/17/11 Grace 8/02/13
  • Okay, I see everyone is angry.

    The majority of you are accusing @curlingrocks of tattling and you are all blaming her for @andrewsgal "possibly" getting enough warnings to equate a ban.

    This one is absolutely, 100% untrue and unfair.

    ANYONE can read a post, flag a post for abuse, and PM a Mod - ANY MOD - about a post where someone is violating (or maybe not violating) the TOU. When things are reported, they go onto a Reporting Forum where EVERY SINGLE MODERATOR across the Bump can see it, comment on it, and take action on it. This is what happened to that post of KC's - it was already flagged and in the Reporting Forum.

    Curlingrocks tagged me in the reported post, as ALL MODS do to alert the Mod of that board that a post has come through as flagged (some Mods have extremely quiet boards so they can give more attention to the Reporting forum than others), to simply say "hey, I've asked them to cool it, they've even since made up, this one isn't real abuse, it's no big deal". That's it. That isn't tattling, it's not even in the realm of tattling, it's her job as a Mod to handle real abuse and discount flagged posts that aren't. Because she was participating in that thread, is active on the SAHM board, and "knows" both posters, she took it upon herself to DEFEND @Cjcouple and @andrewsgal against the flagged post with her comment to me.

    The SAHM board isn't hers to moderate and she didn't try.

    I, as the moderator of this board, read the post and took the action as required of me as a Moderator. Name-calling is a TOU violation and as such, a warning was given for name-calling.

    The second warning I gave out to @andrewsgal, has since been resended because I was wrong. The TOU are quite vague. Moderating requires a great deal of collaboration with other Mods and inference. It also requires you to really know your board, gain their trust, and know when to step in and when not to. I pride myself on being a great, hands-off, fair Moderator for this board. But I don't always get it correct. I have PMed her and let her know this as well as apologized for my mistake because, as several of you have pointed out, apparently "fuck off" isn't a TOU violation. The Mods Forum has seen pages of discussion on what is/isn't a TOU violation when it comes to stuff like "fuck off". It hasn't been clear until recently. Another Mod gave me the link to what @bumpjackie determined was/was not a TOU violation regarding telling someone to 'fuck off", I read it, realized I was wrong in issuing those warnings, and have since PMed those users who got a warning for saying "fuck off". I'm not perfect but I am transparent and always upfront with everyone here.

    I moderate FAIRLY and EQUALLY to all users on THIS board (I can't help you if you are attacked on another board or the TOU are violated against you on another board unless you come to me about it and I can get in contact with that board's mod and try and vouch for you, which I have done a number of times!), I cannot NOT warn users who violate the TOU. It doesn't matter if I was PMed about it, their post was flagged, or I read it myself, the violations still happened. I just don't believe any user is above the TOU here. I don't play favorites and never have. For this particular post, I had already seen it and was going to send the warnings as soon as I got home. Period.

    No one is to blame for anyone getting a warning or being banned but themselves!

    As for some of you being upset that certain users say racist/bigotted/homophobic things, yes, those things are extremely upsetting and inflammatory; however, only things that violate the TOU can be edited, deleted and can users be warned or banned for.

    I've always investigated and discussed upsetting posts with you all, those of you who have brought them to my attention and, while I agree with you that they shouldn't be allowed, the only "power" I have is to edit, delete, warn or ban those things that fit within the box of a TOU violation and I have to document each and every one with a C&P/link and an explanation.

    Thank you for reading everything and I welcome any questions, any time!

    eclaire 9.10.06  diggy 6.2.11

  • @amy052006 and @diapersnwipes - does that give you any indication of just how much time I acutally DO spend here? I read every post, I don't always participate because it's important to remain impartial and emotionally removed so that I CAN be a fair Mod and yet, I'm "not here enough" and you all want a Co-Mod.

    I'd be lying if I said my feelings weren't hurt because you have no NO IDEA how much time this takes from my life and how much I do care to keep doing it, 6 years later....

    eclaire 9.10.06  diggy 6.2.11

  • @mandymack‌ Serious question here, why do you do it if you feel like you can't be a real member of the board because of it? I haven't noticed Mods on other boards having to take as much of a step back as you feel like you need to do.
  • @mandymack‌ you're the best. We love you. Thanks for being awesome.


    So...,who else wants to deal with all that? Takers?


    No???

    Did you miss where several regulars volunteered?
  • Rando pedophile lover... Snort.
  • amy052006 said:
    East Coast

    Baby baby! It's better if you imagine it said in his voice.
  • I appreciate your input and your clarification regarding why you all feel a Co-Mod is good for our board. I not only agree but I respect what this board wants, as a whole and am happy to bring on a Co-Mod.

    Whatever is best for y'all is what I have always tried to give and be. :)

    What I don't understand is why this was done behind my back. If it really was just logistical, why didn't you PM me and allow me to be part of the process? Why did you go to @bumpjackie behind my back? I realize your intention @scatteredtrees wasn't to be hurtful and I appreciate you saying as much but surely you can see why I feel blindsided. I guess I've always thought I was an approachable person and this makes ME feel like I'm in trouble with @bumpjackie and have told her as much. I don't think any of you realize what a microscope Mods sit under and the way you've gone about requesting a Co-Mod makes me look and feel bad.

    Thank you all for listening to my perspective on this entire situation and am happy to help you fill a Co-Mod roll.

    eclaire 9.10.06  diggy 6.2.11

This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"