when B was born at 37 weeks I wouldn't have considered him a late-term preemie, but every dr he has seen (which is a lot) all said that they consider him a late-term preemie and he was even more spehshul because they noted he had tendencies more like they would see with a 34 weeker rather than a 37 weeker.
he is 8 weeks actual, 5 weeks adjusted and he still barely has control over his head and really can't lift it at all and he is still pretty wobbly. I know I shouldn't compare him to his older brother (or any other babies) but this is new territory for us and I can't help but worry he's not on track.
so my question for you ladies is have you noticed your LO(s) development being more on track with their actual age? or do they seem to be following more along the lines of their adjusted age?
Re: preemie/ late-term preemie moms
I think he's doing ok considering everything he's been through but I still feel like he should be doing more than he is and can't figure out how I should be tracking him.
maybe I should lurk the preemie board too...
I'm not new. I just hate The Bump.
I'm not new. I just hate The Bump.
I'm not new. I just hate The Bump.
My girls were born just shy of 35 weeks, and I'm definitely noticing some developmental delays from their actual ages. I got a 10 week email last weekend where all the talk was about how baby should be laughing and cooing at this point...mine just really started having purposeful smiles in the last few days. I started stressing out until I realized I should check out the milestones for 5-6 weeks. Turns out they're pretty much on track for their adjusted age. Also keep in mind that a lot of the milestone timing that you'll read is for the soonest that you can expect to see certain actions, and a lot of babies take a bit longer. A couple weeks' delay can definitely be within the window of acceptable timing for full term babies, so even late term preemies can take a little more time. Hang in there--I'm sure LO will catch up eventually!
The bumpie formerly known as First Time in MI