I just got a call from the nurse at my doctor's office saying that my bloodwork came back positive for Down Syndrome, and I asked the ratio and she said 1:85. But she said that if my dates were off, it could trigger a false positive, and my doctor also told me before the test that my age (43) could trigger it as well. Then she said, "you had a good ultrasound though, right?" and I said yes....which, to me, sounded good. Have any of you had this happen? I know I have to take another test, the Panorama, I think, which has a lower false-positive rate. Please help ease my mind! Thanks! (I've posted this on other boards too, sorry if this is a repeat to some of you!)
**UPDATE: I call the call from my doctor today that everything is good...I am low-risk! And, we are having...a GIRL!!!! Thank you all for your support! I think I can finally try to enjoy this pregnancy now (but I do want to start feeling movement to reassure me!)
Re: Bloodwork results back...please give me your insight! **UPDATE**
US (with RE) 3/24/2014 (two healthy HB), US (with OB) 3/31/2014 (three healthy heartbeats)
BFP#2: 10/22/14 | (beta #1 75, beta # 2 219) | EDD 7/3/15 ~*Please be our RAINBOW*~
BFP#3 5/22/17 | MC 6/17/17 at 7w3d
"At age 25, the risk of having a baby with Down syndrome is 1 in 1,250.
At age 30, the risk is 1 in 1,000.
At age 35, the risk is 1 in 400.
At age 40, the risk is 1 in 100.
At age 45, the risk is 1 in 30."
BFP #2: m/c at 7w, February, 2014
BFP #3: It's a BOY! Please be our rainbow! Due February, 2015
*everyone always welcome*
We will meet with the genetic counselor tomorrow at 9:30, then I'm assuming they will offer us the Panorama test at that point. Thanks
"It's, not, where you are, it's where you're going,
And it's, not, about the things you've done, it's what you're doing, now"
TTC Journey Began 8/12
BFP #1 11/9/12, MMC/D&C 12/21/12 @ 9w2d, EDD 7/24/13
SAs: 2%-3% Morph - RE Official Diagnosis Unexplained
BFN = IUI #1 (Clomid) | IUI #2 (Letrozole)
BFP #2 4/19/14 = IUI #3 (Letrozole)
Expecting Our Elf 12/27/14
~All Welcome~
Ditto pp regarding the "positive" thing. You came back with an elevated risk, not a positive. If I did the math right, there is a 98+% chance your baby DOESN'T have it. 84:85 babies with those same odds DON'T. That's how I had to look at it when my son had elevated risk.
My sons results came back with a 1:10 risk. No, that isn't a typo. He passed the ultrasound perfectly, but my blood work tanked the results. We ended up doing an amnio (this was before the fancy blood tests were available or I'd have been all over that option). He DOESN'T have it.
Yes, your child could be the "1", but chances are they aren't.
Ps. Find out why you got the elevated risk. For me it was my papp-a numbers were way off the norm. Come to find out along with that being indicative of T21, low papp-a also has a correlation with increased risk of developing pre-eclampsia later in pregnancy...which I did get with my son. Don't mean to scare you, but it turned out to help my ob to know those results.
BFP#2 2.5.11 (EDD 10.15.11) DS born 9.28.11
BFP#4 8.27.13 (EDD 5.6.14) DD born 4.23.14
My Recipe Blog
~All AL'ers welcome~
Yes, we learned all of this at our appt yesterday with the genetic counselor. So I ended up having the Panorama test, even though I was offered to skip that and do the amniocentesis. If this blood test comes back positive, at that point we will decide if we want to do the amnio (which I most likely will decline due to the risk, even as low as it is)