Hi ladies! I recently had my second little boy. My water leaked & after no contractions for 29 hours I was put on pitocin & iv fluids. I had continuous monitoring bc of that. But other than that, no other interventions were needed, and I accidentally pulled my iv out during transition so I pushed without pitocin. Would you consider a pitocin induction, no pain meds birth a natural birth?
I would. Having pitocin to start labor sounds like it was needed in your case but you made it through with no pain medication and to me that is a natural labor. Pitocin contractions can be tough so you are one strong woman! Congrats.
I would as well. I've heard pitocin contractions are no joke so way to go! I went my entire labor with 2 hours of pushing and my water was intact. My CNM said the baby was in position (he was OP so it took 2 hours to turn him while pushing) and that if she broke my water he should come out. He came out 2 pushes later. Even though it was technically an intervention I without a doubt had a natural birth!
absolutely. congrats on doing it med free even with pit contrax. thats awesome
Engaged 10/2/1202 BFP (a lil quicker than expected) 12/7/2012 Married to my best friend 12/24/2012 Beautiful baby girl arrived 8/15/2013 BFP #2 3/13/2016
Thanks ladies! I was just telling people I went all natural then wondered if having a pitocin induction was actually considered all natural by others. Sounds like going without pain meds is what qualifies as "natural"to most people. Yay!
Hi ladies! I recently had my second little boy. My water leaked & after no contractions for 29 hours I was put on pitocin & iv fluids. I had continuous monitoring bc of that. But other than that, no other interventions were needed, and I accidentally pulled my iv out during transition so I pushed without pitocin. Would you consider a pitocin induction, no pain meds birth a natural birth?
FWIW, you were not induced. Your water broke on its own and pitocin was used to augment labor. There's a difference.
That said, I'd not only call that med-free (I dislike the term "natural"), I'd call you a rock star. I was in a very similar situation and pit + OP baby + continual monitoring + IV is a witch's brew of no fun so rock on with your bragging rights, dude.
Six years of infertility and loss, four IUIs, one IVF and one very awesome little boy born via med-free birth 10.24.13.
Re: Would you call this a natural birth?
Engaged 10/2/1202
BFP (a lil quicker than expected) 12/7/2012
Married to my best friend 12/24/2012
Beautiful baby girl arrived 8/15/2013
BFP #2 3/13/2016
F15 December Siggy Challenge:
considered all natural by others. Sounds like going without pain meds is what qualifies as "natural"to most people. Yay!
That said, I'd not only call that med-free (I dislike the term "natural"), I'd call you a rock star. I was in a very similar situation and pit + OP baby + continual monitoring + IV is a witch's brew of no fun so rock on with your bragging rights, dude.