In her defense of that loss post, most people dont' know that removing tickers or having ticker warnings or child warnings is customary for that board. So yes, she posted there. But what she posted was actually commiserating, not cruel or rubbing a child in their faces. It was pertinent to the topic and the post wasn't inflammatory at all.
but the rest of her shit is a hot mess.
I agree, and a "sorry, I didn't know the rules and I didn't thought that talking about a living child on the loss board could be hurtful" would have suffice for everybody. But instead of that she chose to go around and keep stirring shit and making things bigger...
Re: Are you for or against circumcision?
Agree.
LFAF Summer 2016 Awards: