I'm curious to see if anyone has had a pregnancy end due to Chorio? My doctors believe that is what ultimately started my PTL (although, we'll never know for sure: chicken and egg situation). I definitely had it, as it was found in both Conner and Ben's placentas and in Benjamin's umbilical cord. I'm on the verge of TTC again with another FET cycle next month, but I am terrified because the stakes are higher now. I've noticed that few people here mention Chorio, which is understandable since it is so rare. Just hoping to reach out to anyone else who has had it - and maybe hear some success stories of people who have had healthy pregnancies after a previous pregnancy with Chorio.
Re: Anyone here that has had Chorio?
I was active after losing my son a year ago, and lurk from time to time. I'm so sorry for the loss of your boys. I lost my son at 23.5 weeks. I went to the hospital after losing my mucus plug and was on bedrest for 5 days before my water broke and I went into labor. They found chorio. My OB said chorio was the cause of my loss. I consulted with 2 mfms and they said it was Incompetent Cervix, and the chorio was secondary. I got a transabdominal cerclage 2 months after my loss and got pregnant again 3 months after my loss. My daughter was born in December at 38 weeks. I did not have any infection or issues with her pregnancy, but had the cerclage. I'm not sure if you have a plan for your next pregnancy, but I'd suggest at least cervical scans. They're not invasive and ptl and chorio can often result from Incompetent Cervix.
I hope that helps! It's such a scary process but you can do it, and it's great that you're trying to learn as much as you can before.
I did, I believe you and I may have spoken about it in a thread a couple of weeks back. There are four doctors in my practice, two of them believe in IC and are pro-cerclage, the other two are not. Because the two pro-cerclage docs are my main doctors (and because I wanted to actually do something this time around instead of just hope and pray) I got a cerclage at 14 weeks this time around. I never had any significant shortening or funneling and I am now 3 weeks out from having my cerclage removed, and no significant sign of labor...so this time it's like a have a cervix of steel.
My doctors who are pro-cerclage do admit they can't say for sure that my PTL was or wasn't due to chorio, but they feel it could have been due to IC so why make me potentially go through another devastating loss when there is something they can try to prevent it, whereas the other doctors answer is "it probably won't happen again". Probably isn't good enough when it comes to my child's life.
They lean a little toward the chorio, because like you said, I did have contractions, which are usually absent with IC. Plus they never got to observe any shortening before hand because I had no warning signs or history of it (first pregnancy) so that is another reason they cannot say for sure it was IC...I just came into L&D at 22 weeks with intense menstrual like cramps, I was dilated to 4 and my water was leaking. But like I said, my doctors wanted to be proactive, and there is no real harm in doing a cerclage, at least early on, the risks are quite low. In my doctor's words, she sees no reason for me to ever go through another pregnancy without a cerclage, just in case.
I am no doctor, but based on what I've been told, I think I did have IC. I think the chorio also played a part, which is why I was contracting, but I think the IC came first, and the chorio was secondary. I think the reason my cervix did so well this time was due to the cerclage, and at this point having the cerclage out isn't going to automatically send me into labor since my pelvis is now supporting the weight versus just my cervix.
One main reason I feel so strongly that my loss was due to IC and not primarily to the chorio is, everyone I know that experienced a loss that was thought to be due to IC was between 18 and 23 weeks. It makes sense that at that point, the cervix, if incompetent, cannot support the weight of the baby anymore. But even the doctors who do not believe in IC cannot explain why chorio would so commonly affect women during this gestational period. I mean, what is it about being 18 to 23 weeks that would make a woman get chorio?
Sorry for the novel, it just makes me angry that some doctors won't even consider other possibilities, and just bank on the fact that "it probably won't happen again". That's fine and dandy for statistics, but we are all real people whose lives were turned upside down when we lost our babies, and saying that statistically it won't happen again is not enough IMO. I am 39 weeks 1 day and my induction (I have GD) is scheduled for Tuesday. Good luck with TTC soon and big hugs, pgal is so hard, but I am proof a successful pregnancy after chorio and/or IC is possible.
My Pregnancy/Parenting BLOG TTC since 5/2011, BFP #1 12/3/11, M/C 12/7/11 @ 4wks 2d. Began seeing RE Sep 2012. October 2012 Metformin 1500 mg= ovulation on CD34 BFP#2 11/14/12 9DPO, EDD 7/26/13, DX Gestational Diabetes @14 wks, our angel born sleeping 3/24/13 @ 22wks 2d. BFP #3 7/4/13 8DPO EDD 3/22/14, DX Gestational Diabetes @14 wks. started insulin @16 wks. Our rainbow, born 3/19/14 @ 39wks 6d., we're so in love!
TTC since 10/2010
IUIs # 1-5 = BFFN
IVF # 1(July 2012) = BFN
IVF # 2 (November 2012) = BFP (MIssed MC D&C @ 8w3d on 1/10/13)