I was lurking on another board and reading about the wide variety of ounces that babies take in terms of formula or expressed BM is what sparked this question. Some babies of the same age took in 30oz and some took in 50oz+. Do needs really vary that widely, or are babies being overfed? Is that even possible?
DD1 born 9.20.13
#2 due 12.23.17

Re: Can an infant be overfed?
#2 due 12.23.17
#2 due 12.23.17
There will most certainly be a difference in formula ounces vs expressed bm ounces for babies of the same age. A 6m old ff baby should take more ounces than a 6m old EP'd baby (for example) as bm changes with time and formula is stagnant.
All my kids have been on the small side, though they are all healthy. Small kids just run in the family. With my first, I had a new doctor diagnose him incorrectly with failure to thrive. It was really stressful at the time and has made me paranoid ever since. So, I'm always worrying about how much food they are getting and how big they are, even though I know I shouldn't.
#2 due 12.23.17
It is also my understanding a baby won't take too much more than they need. But over time you can stretch their tummy?
9/13/12 BFP 9/25/12 M/C at 6.5 weeks
***All AL'ers Welcome***
#2 due 12.23.17
#2 due 12.23.17
My guy is really big. He fit into nine months clothes easily at 3 months. Until I started back at work (16 weeks) he was EBF. He only had two bottles prior to me starting back at work. I was a really chunky baby, so I think a lot is genetics. I know ppl think I overfeed him, which sucks. I love his chunk.
#chunkyisthenewhunky.
If you have ever suffered from over active letdown/oversupply and talk to others who have dealt with this, you will see that many, many of these babies are chunks! (Some, paradoxically, are tiny because they learn to just pull off the boob rather than deal with the crazy volume). But many babies who deal with oversupply just stretch their stomachs to be able to handle the volume and get big.
I think the reason people say that "you can't overfeed a baby" is because they don't want parents trying to self-regulate a baby's weight and to worry about baby rolls at 4 months old. That said, there are studies coming out that suggest that the number of babies under 6 months old who are "overweight" increased from 10 percent in 1980 to 17 percent in 2001. Clearly, genes are not responsible for that increase. Also, many more parents are delaying solids these days compared to 1980. So, that suggests some babies these days are just getting too much milk.
That said, we all know stories of babies who were super chunks who slimmed down as they became mobile. And obviously chunky is better than malnourished, especially if a tiny baby were to get sick. But I think @paychdoc's question last week was whether babies really are getting bigger, and studies say that is definitely happening.
50oz? A day? That's absurd!!? We JUST upped her oz to 8 but she only eats 4x a day. Usually only 3 8oz and then 1 7oz. She was taking 6oz for a good 2 months so I'm hoping this 8oz will last until she starts solids.
#2 due 12.23.17
Francesca Pearl is here! Josephine Hope is almost 3!
I disagree with them on the no max thing. I've read and was told, by my doctor, there absolutely is a max.
#2 due 12.23.17
DX: Unexplained Infertility
IUI #1: Clomid 50mg + Ovidrel + IUI: 11/3/12 - BFN
IUI #2: Clomid 50mg + Ovidrel + IUI: 12/5/12 - BFN
IUI #3: Clomid 100mg (CD 3-7) + 75 iu Bravelle (CD 9 & 11) + Ovidrel (CD 13) + IUI: 1/10/13 - BFP! EDD 10/3/13
**P/SAIF welcome!**