Do conversations usually go like this for you?
person: "How old is your baby"
me: "Almost 1"
person: "Oh, is he walking yet?"
me: "Nope, not yet"
person: "Oh, well I'm sure he will be soon"
I know I'm extra sensitive to this, but I really feel like my kid is underachieving based on everybody's assumptions that a kid should walk at 1. I know that he's totally fine and completely normal, but I'm seriously going to punch the next person who says this. On a positive note, it's made me extra careful to not ever ask if someone's child has reached a specific milestone. I usually say something like "so what's xxx into these days"?
Re: Non-walkers
Mason isn't anywhere near walking. He won't even stand unassisted. I'm not worried or bothered. People just don't know. I have always, always heard that babies walk by about one so it seems like a normal question to ask.
I'm not bothered by it. Try to just relax and trust in what you guys are saying. Every baby is different and does things on their own time.
How old?
11 months.
Does he walk?
Not yet.
Is he a great sleeper?
LOL. No.
What does he say?
He growls like a dinosaur.
Um, awesome.
So now I say things like "oh, your baby is so cute! How old? Tell me about her."
FWIW, my aunt is a pediatric PT and she was saying a lot of new studies say it's beneficial for babies to walk after one because their bones are still so soft.
I am sure she could get me some actual sources if I asked and anyone was interested.
Anywho, I know sometimes it makes you paranoid but C's PT/EI therapist just discharged him on Friday and said he's doing great and the normal range of walking goes up to 18m, so don't rush it! Her words.
I am also now aware that I've probably said idiotic things to pregnant women and new parents. I'm sure we're also doomed to forget and say ridiculous things to pregnant women and new moms when we're old ladies, too.
Not walking, and I have to admit having somewhat unrealistic expectations myself. DS1 was walking right around 11 months, so I totally expected his brother to the same. #badmom
That said, I actually thought DS1 was an early-walker, because I thought after 1 was more typical. It feels like more on here are walking sooner - but that's probably just perception.
But...I'm with you on the sensitivity. My step-sister has a little girl 1 week older than DS2 and started walking at 9 months. I've been hearing for 3 months (from step-mom) how Aedan should be walking to "keep up with his cousin." I hate it.
Big Kid Jan 2010
Littlest Man Sept 2012
I just spin my response to focus on the positives - Is she walking? Nope, she's much more interested in eating and having things brought to her. Is she crawling? Nope, she's figured out how to call the dog to her, so she doesn't have to.
But yeah, you get sensitive, and it stings every time someone posts a facebook comment to the effect of "I bet she's crawling everywhere now!" Nope, nope, she's not.
Now that she's suddenly started crawling, pulling up, cruising, and standing (in the last few weeks), I'm so excited that she's catching up that it didn't even occur to me that people think she should be walking. I wouldn't worry too much - I think there are *plenty* of non-walkers by 1.