I'm pretty "to each her own" but I find it bizarre when people say their 2 or 3 year old is however many months. I mean really, once your kid is one, s/he is a year-old. I can *kinda* justify 18 months but anything much beyond that is just semantics--and I'm not sure I get the reasoning. I just saw a post on a msg board of a local group I belong to where someone was looking for a stroller for their 30-month old...um your two and half year-old?
Re: Giving Toddler's Age in Months...I just don't get it
I do get the 18 month thing but yeah, 30 month seems weird... I get being more particular about halves or even quarters but still... Why not say 2.5 year old or whatnot?
Though I haven't really BTDT yet so perhaps there's something I'm missing...
Up to 2 I can see, but after that, weird.
Oh, and I've seen the 48 month clothes at BRU and also thought that very odd.
yeah, I think 18 should probably be the cutoff.
I just shot water through my nose! LMAO!
As I get older, I think I'm going to start referring to myself in months rather than years... although 423 months doesn't sound much better than 36...