Birth plans

Re: Birth plans

• monkey_mcfee member

  January 16

  I’m with you! I’m a second time mom, and last time and this time I just want baby and me earthside. I was in the hospital, was induced, and took all the drugs. I did what I could for a vaginal birth (which I got), but was also fine with a c section. To me, childbirth is a process that has to happen, I don’t see it as this mega spiritual thing. 

  Report0 Reply
• Loading the player...
• knottiebe8960c45a6cab4f member

  January 18

  I appreciate the respectful tone of this discussion, and I want to offer a counter-perspective that often gets flattened online into “anti-hospital” or “anti-doctor,” which I don’t think is accurate or fair.
  
  The purpose of a birth plan, for many of us, is not control — it’s risk reduction.
  
  Yes, birth is unpredictable. But unpredictability doesn’t mean that all approaches are equal, or that defaulting to maximum intervention produces the best outcomes. In fact, a large body of obstetric research suggests the opposite: routine intervention in low-risk pregnancies often increases complications rather than preventing them.
  
  A few widely accepted points from the evidence:
  
  • Most pregnancies are low risk, and the majority of births progress safely without intervention.
  • Interventions are not neutral. Each one increases the likelihood of the next (the “cascade of interventions”).
  • Many common hospital practices are driven by protocol, liability concerns, and time pressure — not individualized physiology.
  
  For example:
  • Continuous electronic fetal monitoring (standard in many hospitals) does not improve outcomes for low-risk pregnancies, but does significantly increase cesarean rates.
  • Induction of labor, while lifesaving when medically indicated, is associated with higher rates of epidural use, instrumental delivery, and cesarean, particularly in first-time mothers.
  • Episiotomies were once routine and are now widely discouraged because evidence shows natural tearing often heals better and causes less long-term pelvic floor damage.
  • Cesarean birth is major abdominal surgery with real downstream risks — including higher rates of hemorrhage, infection, placental complications in future pregnancies, and neonatal respiratory issues.
  
  None of this means “never intervene.”
  It means intervene when there is a clear medical indication, not preemptively “just in case.”
  
  That’s where birth plans come in.
  
  For many people, a birth plan is simply a way to communicate:
  • “Please don’t intervene unless there’s a medical reason.”
  • “Please explain risks, benefits, and alternatives before acting.”
  • “Please allow time for physiologic labor when mother and baby are stable.”
  
  This approach is actually aligned with evidence-based medicine, not opposed to it.
  
  It’s also worth noting that many obstetricians, midwives, and labor nurses personally choose low-intervention births for themselves — not because they’re unaware of emergencies, but because they understand how rare they are in appropriately screened pregnancies and how often intervention itself creates the emergency.
  
  Finally, choosing minimal intervention is not about rejecting safety.
  For many of us, it is the safety strategy.
  
  Different people feel safest in different environments, and that matters. But it’s important to recognize that hospitals can be both lifesaving and a source of unnecessary intervention — those truths coexist.
  
  A birth plan isn’t a demand that nothing go wrong.
  It’s a request that physiology be trusted until it gives a reason not to be.

  Report1 Reply
• noortle member

  January 19

  I have had two successful home births with a midwife, and for me the birth plan was not a “this is how it must go” but more a goal to help me focus on how to prepare for birth. I personally felt much more prepared and less scared about birth when I was planning for it, even knowing anything can happen.
  
  Also the above post is very accurate —  It’s a way to communicate with the hospital staff and establish a baseline understanding. I knew there might be complications that would cause me to go the hospital (we’re real close though so that helps), and I wanted to have direction written down so I didn’t have to tell the doctors and nurses what I wanted while I was in labor. I wanted, if possible, things like delayed cord clamping and immediate skin to skin, which is not always the norm at the hospital even if there’s nothing preventing it.
  

  Report0 Reply
• kateysmyth810 member

  January 20

  I always thought I would want a home birth but as a FTM I realized I have no idea what to expect and even less control. I also without knowing got an OB which gets me a spot at a hospital that is considered one of the best in Canada. Their standard practise is delayed clamping, immediate skin to skin afterwards, which I've come to learn is somethings moms have to advocate for, so I feel very lucky and comfortable. I have to do more research into the medical interventions but I think I'll opt for "only if required". I'm also reading a lot about different positions that are meant to be better than the typical lying on your back, which I had assumed was just the standard way. Good luck mammas!!  

  
  

  Report0 Reply