Infertility

Opinions on PGS

APM_SLPAPM_SLP member
edited August 2016 in Infertility
Hi all!

im still debating on PGS and would love some guidance/opinions.  My RE is advising against it due to my age (35), and good egg quality. This is our first try with IVF or any IF treatments for that matter.   We are on day 3 right now and have 10 embryos going strong.   Obviously not sure what our final number will be yet! If we only have 3-4 embryos when all is said and done, I don't nessecarily feel as though PGS will be worth the cost? 

We are lucky that our insurance covers all transfers related to this one retrieval, once our detectable has been met- which at his point of course it has been!

If we had a ton of embryos I could see PGS being worth it, to save us the heartbreak of numerous failed transfers.  

Is my line of thought correct here? Would love to hear what you all think!

thanks! 
Me: 35  DH: 36
Me: 1, possibly 2, blocked tubes
DH: severe MFI
Married and TTC since 2/15
Started stims 7/21/16, ER  8/2 --> 17 eggs, 5 blasts after PGS testing.
Fresh transfer 8/8/16: Chemical Pregnancy
FET #1 9/13: PGS tested 5AA, BFN
Endometrial biopsy 10/18/16: normal result
ERA test 10/18/16: "receptive" result
FET #2  1/3/17: natural cycle, BFP!!! TWINS!!  EDD: 9/21 (8/31 with twin adjustment)

Re: Opinions on PGS

  • Hi @APM_SLP! I am 27 and my RE said we probably didn't need to do PGS testing since the research showed that 1 in 500 would be abnormal for my age group. With the odds in our favor, we still decided to do PGS just to cover all the bases. I didn't want the added stress of not knowing if the embryo(s) we were transferring had some genetic abnormality that would cause transfer to fail. Also my imagination was running wild with "what if we have some genetic disorder we don't know about, and we spend another year transferring non-viable embryos!". Just freaked me out and wanted piece of mind. Out of the 8 we tested, 7 came back normal. 1 was missing the long arm of chromosome 4. We still have 4 that are untested, bc the testing we paid for only covered 8. I hope this info helps you in your decision! Good luck!!
    *TW - Pregnancy mentioned*
    Me: 28 DH: 33, Married May 2014
    3 failed IUIs Dec '15 - Feb '16
    IVF April/May 2016 - 1 failed fresh transfer. 11 snow angels.
    1st FET 7/29/16 = BFP
    Lawson arrived on 4/24/2017 at 7lbs 15oz, 21 1/2 inches long!
    Surprise pregnancy!! Baby #2 due 10/11/18 <3
  • Loading the player...
  • I was 32 when I had my ER and we decided to do PGS testing. My RE told me that based on my age group, around 80% would be good.  Boy am I glad we paid the extra $$ since only 4 of my 8 came back normal! 

    This is is an individual decision and you have to do what's right for you. If you have the money or it's covered, you should seriously consider.

    **Warning - Child Mentioned**

    Me: 33, DH: 39   Unexplained Infertility

    4 IUIs (chlomid) in 2013 which resulted in DS born in April 2014

    TTC #2 since August 2015

    5 rounds of IUIs (1 chlomid: resistent, 1 femara, 3 gonal f) = all BFN

    ER March 9: 26 eggs retrieved, 19 mature and 17 fertilized, 8 made it to genetic testing, 4 normal!

    FET #1 5/31 = BFN

    FET#2 7/26 = BFP!

    BabyFruit Ticker

  • Hi @APM_SLP ,

    We did not do PGS.  Our main reason for not was the cost... and also because we'd heard there's some risk to the embryos for the testing.  I guess we were also thinking that had we gotten pregnant on our own, we wouldn't have any idea what was going on with our embryos at such an early stage in development.  I guess we feel that such defects are the risk we are taking on when trying to have a baby.  But I agree with the ladies... If it's something you have money or coverage for and will lessen your stress about everything, I would consider it too.  This was our first IVF cycle and being that I'm considered young (ha!) and healthy, it wasn't highly recommended to us.  Now you all are making me worried!  Haha.

    Me: 35 DH: 41, Married since 2009

    TTC since June 2012

    Aug. 2012: CP

    2013 Several cycles of TI with Clomid = BFN

    Feb. 2014: IUI = BFN

    June 2014: IUI w/Clomid = BFN

    Jul. 2014: IUI w/Letrozole = BFN

    Apr. 2016: Consult to begin IVF

    May 2016 TI w/Follistim and Ovidrel = BFN

    Jul. 2016: BCPs, baby aspirin, Vitamin D, COQ10, DHEA, Gonal F, Menopur, Cetrotide, Novarel, Leuprolide Acetate: 21 eggs retrieved, (10 w/ ICSI, 11 w/conv. IVF) 13 fertilized

    Jul. 2016: Endometrin, Fresh Transfer 2AB = CP

    7 frozen

    Oct. 2016: BCPs, baby aspirin, Estradiol, PIO, FET 4AA = CP

    6 frozen

    Nov. 2016: Hospitalized for small bowel obstruction

    Mar. 2017: Diagnostic Laparoscopy = Twist found in intestine - part of small intestine, part of colon, and appendix removed, bowel resection - caused by Endometriosis

    May 2017: 3.75 Lupron Depot

    June 2017: FET postponed due to complex cysts in breasts

    June 2017: Endometrial scratch

    Jul. 2017: Baby aspirin, Estradiol, PIO, FET 4AA (lost 1 4AA in thaw) = CP

    4 frozen

    Sept. 2017: ERA testing

    Oct. 2017: Breast cysts biopsied

    Dec. 2017: FET

  • Hey! I was 26 when my eggs were retrieved, and it was not recommended that we get them tested. 6 failed embryos later (with 3 up in the air) I really wish we had. It would have saved us a lot of heartbreak and money. If we do another round of IVF we will for sure be doing PGS testing. Especially if your insurance covers it, there is no reason not to do it (unless your religion has problems with not letting all embryos be transferred).
    About us:
    Me - 28, Lean PCOS
    DH - 31
    Married June 2010, TTC since March 2014
    Blog: ourbinarystar.com

    FET cycle #3 Transfer July 28th 2016, Triplets born healthy on February 26th 2017 at 33w1d!

  • Thanks for your replys!

    i guess I should have specified that our insurance doesn't cover PGS (or I would definitely do it), but rather it covers the transfers only. 

    It it sounds like if end up with a good amount of embryos, we should do it.  But maybe not worth the money it if we only end up with a couple.  
    Me: 35  DH: 36
    Me: 1, possibly 2, blocked tubes
    DH: severe MFI
    Married and TTC since 2/15
    Started stims 7/21/16, ER  8/2 --> 17 eggs, 5 blasts after PGS testing.
    Fresh transfer 8/8/16: Chemical Pregnancy
    FET #1 9/13: PGS tested 5AA, BFN
    Endometrial biopsy 10/18/16: normal result
    ERA test 10/18/16: "receptive" result
    FET #2  1/3/17: natural cycle, BFP!!! TWINS!!  EDD: 9/21 (8/31 with twin adjustment)

  • emgem819emgem819 member
    edited August 2016
    If you can afford the PGS I would say go for it.  I wish we had.  We ended up with 8 embryos and first one didn't stick and this second one looks like it might turn out to be a MC so it was likely chromosomally abnormal too.  If we had done the PGS testing we'd have been able to tell which embryos were normal and wouldn't have gone through all this.  PGS testing was $4000 so on top of the already big price tag we didn't choose to do it for that reason.  also my re told us it wasn't necessary.  But if you can swing it, I'd definitely do it.
    Married to DH since 8/15
    TTC since 5/15
    PCOS, 35+, diagnosed with pre-diabetes
    TI for 4 cycles: 1 round of femara; 2 rounds femara/ injectables: all ended in BFN. 
    3 IUI Cycles: letrozole/Follistim with HCG Trigger,all resulted in BFN.
    FET #1: Baseline appt 4/28/16, Gonal-F/Menopur stims, Centrotide 5/4/16, ER 5/11/16; 6/8/16 ET, BFN
    FET #2: Baseline appt 6/22/16, Estrace/PIO shots: 7/12/16 ET, 1st beta 7/21/16: 83 BFP, 2nd beta 7/23/16: 315. 1st U/S: 8/4/16 empty sac.  2nd U/S: 8/10/16 yolk sac appeared, everything stopped growing. Office D&C: 8/11/16, MC.
    FET #3: Baseline appt 12/28/16, Estrace/PIO shots: 1/17/17 ET, 1st beta 1/27/17: 146 BFP, 2nd beta 1/29/17: 336, 1st U/S: 2/16/17, 2 healthy twin babies measuring 7w0d.  EDD: 10/5/17
    Pregnancy Ticker
  • I'm 35 and had 7 embryos. Three were normal. I'm so glad I did the testing even though it was expensive. We are able to transfer one embryo at a time which is much safer. Plus I feel like we saved time and money by not transferring embryos that were not viable. This is a very personal decision, so it's important to weigh the pros and cons. Best of luck with everything.
    *******
    Married Jan. 2014
    Me:36 DH: 39
    TTC since August 2014, Mild PCOS + uterine fibroids
    Myomectomy June 2015- 18 fibroids removed
    IVF #1, May 2016 = 32 eggs retrieved, 12 fertilized, 7 frozen, 3 PGS normal
    FET#2, July 2016 = one embryo transferred 
    TRIGGER
    BFP! Beta = 617
    Due date = 4/9/17
    Delivery date = 3/20/17
  • Our RE strongly recommended PGS, even though I'm only 31 (30 at the time of ER). She said that she thinks PGS testing will be the norm in a few years. 

    While I was really sad about the results, I feel it's a good thing we did it. We sent 4 embryos samples to get tested and only ONE came back normal. Had we not done PGS, I could have wound up with 3 miscarriages. 

    Ultimately it's up to you. Our insurance did not cover it, so it was a hard decision to make, but we decided we wanted to give our embryos and my body the best chance there is to make everything work.

    Me: 32, Hubs: 36
    Married: September 2013
    TTC since April 2014, Dx: MFI
    DH started Clomid Oct 2015
    April-June 2016- 3 IUIs: All BFN
    July 2016- IVF #1: 16 eggs ->1 PGS-normal embryo
    Sept 2016- single FET #1: BFN
    Nov 2016- IVF #2 16 eggs -> 3 PGS-normal embryos
    Jan 2017- single FET #2: BFN
    Feb 2017- endometrial scratch
    March 2017- FET #3 (double transfer): BFP!
       Beta #1: 386 (9dp5dt), Beta #2: 1,960 (12dp5dt)
       Pregnant with: Triplets Twins Singleton
       It's a GIRL! :)
       EDD: November 16, 2017
       Dx w/ preeclampsia: Updated delivery date: 10/4/17
    <3 Hazel Summerlyn <3
    Find me on the IG

    BabyFruit Ticker
  • We decided to do PGS for the reasons the other ladies mentioned above.  I do not want to put myself through miscarriages (physically or emotionally) and the extra money for PGS is worth that alone to me.  I'm 30, so it is not like I have a high likelihood of having abnormals, but as you can see from the others before me, just because you're young doesn't mean you automatically get perfect embryos!
    ***BFP & Child Warning***

    Me: 34, DH: 38 ~ TTC since 2014
    IUI #1-3 (Nov 2015, Feb 2016, May 2016) = BFNs
    IVF ER (July 2016) = 7 PGS normal embryos
    FET #1 (Sept 2016) = BFP! DD born 5/30/17
    FET #2 (April 2019) = BFN
    FET #3 (July 2019) = BFP! DS born 3/27/20
  • According to my RE, at age 35 50% of the embryos will have a chromosome problem.  With my age-35 embryos, one was PGS normal and one was abnormal.  The abnormal one was a 5AA grade and would have had no chance to actually become a baby, even though it looked perfect.  

    Why go through all of this stress and money just to put in an embryo that has no chance to succeed?? The stats I have seen say that 80% of IVF failure is thought to be related to a chromosomal problem with the embryo.  We had a failed FET last month, but I know the embryo we put in was picture perfect and we did everything possible to give her a chance to succeed.  We are in the process of getting donated eggs from my sister and absolutely plan to do PGS on those embryos, too.
    Me: Age 40  Husband: Age 41
    Chemo killed my ovaries (along with a BRCA1 mutation, which causes DOR)
    4/30/13 ER just prior to chemo: 8 embryos frozen at 2pn. 2 survived to blasts/1 PGS normal

    4/16 ER cancelled on CD7: 1 follicle on L/ 0 follicles on R
    FET #1  7/13/16  BFN

    Super shocker +HPT 9/19
    Baby Alyce arrived 5/8/17

    Went forward with donor eggs from my sister for baby #2
    ER 4/24, 5 eggs fertilized/1 survived to blast and was chromosomally normal.

    FET 2/15 (my sister/donor's birthday!).  Beta 10dp5dt:172; beta 12dp5dt: 425

    My TTC/Cancer/Random thoughts blog:  http://www.dinktodiapers.blogspot.com/
  • We are also doing PGS testing even though our insurance doesn't cover it. Like many of the ladies said I felt like it was better to give us a higher chance of success since we were already spending so much money. I feel like there is no reason to go thru the emotional and physical stress of miscarriages if you don't have to. 

    Me 35, DH 37

    Unexplained infertility and TTC since December 2014

    February 2016 - May 2016: 3 IUI's -- all BFN

    August 2016: IVF #1 (Lupron, Gonal F and Menopur) -- 12 retrieved, 9 fertilized, 3 frozen and 1 x day 5 hatching blast transferred -- BFN. Sent remaining 3 embryos for PGS testing -- 2 didn't survive thaw, 1 was abnormal.

    February 2017: IVF #2 (Gonal F, Menopur, and Ganirelix) -- 12 retrieved, 6 fertilized, 3 sent for PGS testing and all were abnormal

    March 2018: IVF #3 (Menopur, Follistim, Ganirelix and HGH) -- 14 retrieved, 12 fertilized, 4 sent for PGS testing, and 3 were PGS normal

    May 2018: FET #1 -- BFN

    August 2018: FET #2 -- BFP!!! healthy baby girl born May 2019!!

    July 2020: FET #3 -- embyro did not survive thaw

    September 2020 - IVF #4 (Menopur, Follistim, Ganirelix and HGH) -- 1 PGS normal

    October 2020 - FET #4 -- BFN

    January 2021 - IVF #5 (Menopur, Follistim, Ganirelix and HGH)  -- 2 PGS normal

    February 2021 - FET #5 - BFP!!! Due 11/6/2021



  • @PNW12RN we wouldn't be wasting money because  my insurance covers all of our transfers.  But we would be paying for the PGS. 

    I know now I will do it if we end up with a decent amount of embryos.  I guess I'm just trying to figure out if it's worth it if we end up with like 2 embryos.  
    Me: 35  DH: 36
    Me: 1, possibly 2, blocked tubes
    DH: severe MFI
    Married and TTC since 2/15
    Started stims 7/21/16, ER  8/2 --> 17 eggs, 5 blasts after PGS testing.
    Fresh transfer 8/8/16: Chemical Pregnancy
    FET #1 9/13: PGS tested 5AA, BFN
    Endometrial biopsy 10/18/16: normal result
    ERA test 10/18/16: "receptive" result
    FET #2  1/3/17: natural cycle, BFP!!! TWINS!!  EDD: 9/21 (8/31 with twin adjustment)

  • @APM_SLP When I was researching PGS testing, it read a couple of research articles that suggested it's not in a couple's (or woman's) best interest to do PGS with one or two embryos. The authors said it would be better to transfer them without testing. 
    *******
    Married Jan. 2014
    Me:36 DH: 39
    TTC since August 2014, Mild PCOS + uterine fibroids
    Myomectomy June 2015- 18 fibroids removed
    IVF #1, May 2016 = 32 eggs retrieved, 12 fertilized, 7 frozen, 3 PGS normal
    FET#2, July 2016 = one embryo transferred 
    TRIGGER
    BFP! Beta = 617
    Due date = 4/9/17
    Delivery date = 3/20/17
  • Thanks @cmm012.  So much to consider! 
    Me: 35  DH: 36
    Me: 1, possibly 2, blocked tubes
    DH: severe MFI
    Married and TTC since 2/15
    Started stims 7/21/16, ER  8/2 --> 17 eggs, 5 blasts after PGS testing.
    Fresh transfer 8/8/16: Chemical Pregnancy
    FET #1 9/13: PGS tested 5AA, BFN
    Endometrial biopsy 10/18/16: normal result
    ERA test 10/18/16: "receptive" result
    FET #2  1/3/17: natural cycle, BFP!!! TWINS!!  EDD: 9/21 (8/31 with twin adjustment)

  • @APM_SLP The genetics lab my RE uses recently started offering a plan for those with fewer embryos to test. The package for 8 embryos is ~$2000, but if you do one at a time the first is $750 and each additional is $250. Even though we've only ended up with 3 embryos after two transfers, we opted for the plan that includes 8. We will do one or two more cycles before moving to donor eggs. The package will cover those embryos as well, if we haven't reached the limit at that point.

    All three of our embryos have come back abnormal so far. For me, not having to go through the failed transfers or MC is worth the investment.
  • We decided to do PGS testing, even though my RE said it's probably not necessary for my age (32). We had 3 embryos and decided that it's worth it even though insurance didn't cover it either. Out of the 3, only 1 came back normal in time for my transfer. One was missing a chromosome and 1 came back undetermined. We re-tested the last one and now have a second normal embryo left. At the end of the day, it's your personal decision. Yes, you take the same risks getting pregnant naturally. But we felt like if we have this option to do the testing, why not take it to ensure that we get the best results. Like other ladies said, avoiding possible heartbreak or a MC are worth the investment alone to me personally. 
    ***History & TW in Spoiler***

    ***bfp & child warning***
    TTC - since 2014
    7 rounds of Clomid - BFN
    IUI #1 - October 2015 - BFN
    IUI #2 - November 2015 - BFN
    IUI #3 - December 2015 - BFN
    IVF #1 - March 2016
    Retrieval #1 - April 2016
    FET #1 - May 2016 - BFP!!! DS - Born January 2017
    Trying for baby #2...
    FET #2 - January 2018 - BFN  
    No more embryos left; switched to a new RE
    IVF/Retrieval #2 - January 2019
    IVF/Retrieval #3 - March 2019
    FET #3 - April 2019 - BFP!!! - DD: Born December 2019
    Trying for baby #3...
    FET #4 - October 2021 - BFP!!! - Due June 2022


  • We are doing PGS as a byproduct of having to do PGD. If they have to go so far and spend so much time to look for a specific single gene disorder, they said that it would kind of be stupid/pointless if they also didn't look at all the other chromosomes, since an embryo might be listed as "normal" in terms of the genetic disorder, it could still have missing/extra chromosomes and would not be viable after all.

    If we didn't have to do PGD, based on my age (31) my RE probably would say that I wouldn't need it;. However, I would want to do PGS to be reassured that they were transferring back the "best"/healthiest embryo, but the money would definitely be the deciding factor...
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"