So I'm having an ob-gyn for the first time and I'm nervous about it. I'll admit it's mostly because of that documentary, The Business of Being Born. Watching that has given me this fear that all ob-gyn's just want to hurry up and " 'section ya" so they can get home in time for dinner, golf, vacation, etc...
Plus my midwife assisted hospital birth was so great, and I'm terribly sad my midwife isn't in my town anymore.
So my question is, for those of you who have had experience with both, what were the major differences, if any?

SaveSave
Re: For those who have had a midwife AND ob-gyn
With my second child, I never saw or met the on call OB until the baby was almost out. She came in, threw on gloves, and caught the baby about 10 seconds later. The hospital was packed that night, and I had an extremely quick delivery the second time around. I think I was in labor about 2 hours total. The hospital also had multiple c-sections lined up, so there were no drs available to administer epidurals, either. The whole thing was kind of crazy.
So.... I wasn't terribly impressed with either, but maybe I had unique circumstances! I'm planning on going with an OB again the third time around. Either way it'll all work out!
SaveSave
My MW was there with me the whole time but wouldn't have been if she had had multiple patients that night. I was the only one laboring, hence her presence. But, as I've outlined elsewhere, it was a horrible experience from start to finish but she did not leave me alone, which was the plus side of it. I didn't know her well before she became my provider.
My OB and I knew each other very well because I saw her a lot towards the end of my pregnancy (because I was AMA and overdue, I had a lot of extra scans). I got lucky and had her for my L&D. She checked in on me once and was only there towards the end of it but I had a much more personal connection than I had with MW.
As for C-sections, those are really OB dependent. The OB that sent me in to the hospital for my second told me to mentally prepare myself for a C-section and the OB that delivered my baby, when I told her what first OB had said, was all like, 'no! we're trying this vaginally first and if we get in trouble, we go to C-section - but there is nothing about you that makes me say C-section right away'.
OB's in general are much more interventionalist than MW so you do gamble a lot more. There's a reason that the C-section rate in the state is 33% (or at last check - I haven't checked since 2014). I just really think it depends on what kind of provider you get and how well you make your intentions known.
June Siggy Challenge: Robert Downey Jr
37 yr old mama with 4yr old DD and 2 yr old DS
June Siggy Challenge: Robert Downey Jr
37 yr old mama with 4yr old DD and 2 yr old DS
SaveSave
My midwife practice was combined with an OB practice. You choose the midwife or ob route. With my first pregnancy I chose the midwife route and LOVED my experience. It was fantastic. An OB was present at my daughter's birth because she was in fetal distress, but did not have to intervene.
For my 2nd and 3rd pregnancies, I had some issues (both ended in losses) and dealt with the OB side exclusively. It was terrible. While the midwife half of the practice seemed more conservative than most midwives, the OBs were VERY relaxed in a bad way. My husband called them "loosey goosey".
For this pregnancy, I switched to a traditional OB practice, but I will deliver with a midwife and will switch to a midwife practice when I feel regular kicks.
SaveSave