Hi all! Sorry but I had to take a bit of a break, and I think I'm in a much better mental spot than I was a month ago. I have been lurking here and there though and I'm glad to see so much persevering and good strong attitudes, despite wishing more of you/us weren't still here. But how all of you approach conquering this hurdle is always inspiring

Anyway, I was wondering if anyone saw this study that FF did. I found it really interesting as to the variance between when we in our dreaded TWW feel the optimistic possibility of getting a BFP, versus the hard data of when that BFP actually typically shows up.
https://www.fertilityfriend.com/Faqs/#/Faqs/When_can_I_expect_a_positive_HPT_if_I_am_pregnant.html
Me: 41 / Fiance: 35 + One DS, one dog & two kitties...
First BFP: 1/17/16 = EDD 9/21/16 (MMC)
Second BFP: 6/24/16 (CP)
Third BFP: 2/7/17 = EDD 10/20/17 🌈 *** BORN 10/23 *** 🌈
Fourth BFP : 2/5/19 = EDD 10/14/19
Re: Statistical Data on Testing by FF
I first read this article several days ago. Yet, I tested a couple hours ago; not FMU, at only 11 DPO. *smh*
TTC 09/15
*TW Loss mentioned*
BFP 12/15/15 EDD: 08/26/16
MMC discovered 1/25/16 at 9 +3
TTCAL 3/2016
Acupuncture 11/16
Dx December 2016: unexplained
January 2017: 50 mg Clomid + TI =
BFP #2 01/30/17 Please be a sticky baby!
EDD: 10/15/17 Measuring ahead! 10/12/17
Ambrose born on his due date!
I blame falling for advertising. In my waffling back and forth over doing it early, the box convinced me with its "Test 5 days earlier" claim in big print (followed of course by a series of asterisks in much finer print). Though I seem to find a different excuse for testing early every time
"Compulsion" is exactly right! (eta)
*TW*
TWIN LOSS 7.2.15
BFP 9.7.15 CP
BFP 12.31.15 MC 2.28.16
BFP 10.14.17 CP
BFP 3.10.18 D&C 4.13.18