Hi I'm already considered high risk due to reoccurring Cholestasis in my previous pregnancies. I'm usually officially high risk in the 3rd trimester. Weeks: 10w4d Appointments/upcoming appointments: I had my first appt this last Friday and got to see the little bean (because of no LMP to base an EDD on). Baby looked good and I now have an EDD of Nov. 4. Rants/Raves/Questions: My oldest is excited about this baby. He's informed me that he has to come with me to all my appts. He also decided on a name for the baby (I don't think DH like it though).
I don't know if I'll be considered high risk or not due to my issues last pregnancy. According to all the docs they say it was a fluke... but I'll believe it when I see it. I guess Ill also lwrn more once I finally get in for my first real appointment. I am grateful that this practice has high risk docs on staff so I won't have to drive nearly 2 hours to see a MFM (like last pregnancy) if needed. Anyways just popping in to say hi and give happy thoughts to all those facing a high risk/unusual pregnancy!
TinyAlligator born @ 36w, 3lb2oz, IUGR BabyFlamingo due 11/30/16
Hi hi! Hope everything is going nice and smoothly for everybody so far.
Weeks: 8+3
Appointments/Upcoming Appointments: Had my viability u/s last week. 4/25 I have my NIPT bloodwork done and 5/6 I go in for my 12 weeks u/s. On 5/5 I'm doing a 24 hr urine catch and bringing that in so they have a baseline to monitor for preeclampsia.
Rants/Raves: Last week was a circus. I had started spotting bright red and was sure another loss was imminent. Went in last Monday and they did a pelvic exam and found a fingertip-sized polyp protruding from the opening of my cervix. Good news is that's what was causing the bleeding. Bad news is that it needs to be removed and they really don't want to mess with it while I'm pregnant. So they're monitoring and I'm crossing my fingers it doesn't grow anymore so they're not forced to deal with it now. They had me wait a day for the u/s because the exam had me bleeding a good bit but on Tuesday when I went in the little bean looked perfect. It's such an exciting/terrifying journey, isn't it?
Me: 38 l DH: 41 Gavin - 8/27/10 *TW* Gabriel - 2nd tri loss 5/17/16 Trisomy 18 & 21 Hope - 2nd tri loss 12/7/16 complications from pneumonia
High risk due to history of cholestasis in previous pregnancy.
7w2d
Last ultrasound went okay, but the amniotic sac was an odd shape (it's pinched on one side). Good heartbeat though. We go in again next week for another look at the amniotic sac.
Weeks: 10+6... OB set me back to 10+3 based on my first US but I know when I O'd so I'm sticking with my original date.
Appointments/ upcoming appointments: saw the OB today (finally); I'm staying off work until after my NT ultrasound at 13 weeks (OB agreed with my MD that going back would likely be okay, but for my own mental health and BSC she's cool with me staying off until we see the hemorrhage again...or not hopefully!).
NT ultrasound at 13w.
Rants/Raves/Questions: OB seems nice; there's 2 of them in the practice, so I'll end up seeing them both for appointments but there's 10 OBs at the hospital so there's a 1/5 chance one of the two of them will actually deliver my babes. Super excited that it sounds like basically every OB at the hospital is okay with doing a breech extraction if baby B is transverse or breech as long as baby A is head down and there's a less than 20% discrepancy in their sizes. She's also fairly confident I can make it to 38-39 weeks, so they won't induce before then (and will book a CS is baby A is breech) in that ballpark.
@comealongponds, a friend JUST had her twins last night vaginally (at 37 weeks, I believe). Her daughter was head down and her son was a breech extraction. Both babies and mama are doing great, though they're having a little trouble maintaining body temperature (super normal in babies born a bit early). That's great that your hospital is really supportive of that!
Hey all, thought I'd check in here after today's events. I'm not sure if youll want me here and I officially count as high risk or not, but they've already let me know I'll be testing with the high-risk doc because of Zika concerns.
Warning this is so long! And formatted weirdly, apparently, because I guess TB hates me today?
So basically what happened was that we were supposed to go to Puerto Rico in February for one of H's company's co-founders' wedding. It was pretty much a "have to go" situation. Then Zika started popping up and being a whole big THING so I did my due diligence and after reviewing all the info from the CDC and talking it through with my OB/GYN, we decided H would go alone and I'd stay home so that we didn't have to skip any cycles of TTC. (I wasn't totally enthused about going on this long trip in such a short number of days since H wanted to take as few days off as possible. At the time we would have had to TTA the cycle before and then the recommendation would have amounted to at least one cycle after. So it was two cycles we would have had to skip for me to go to a wedding for people I don't really know.)
When H got back, I emailed the doctor again just to check that nothing had really changed. She said it was fine to start TTC as at that point, there had only been one case of sexually transmitted Zika, and they believed it was due to blood in the semen, which is uncommon so it shouldn't have been a problem. So we went on with TTC and did end up conceiving that cycle we would have skipped. Yaayy! It totally paid off, right?!
Well, it turns out that over the last couple weeks (so too late for me to have changed anything), the CDC and researchers have found that it actually IS sexually transmitted and the new recommendation is that if you are a woman who isn't pregnant and your partner goes to an active Zika zone (which PR was at the time), you either abstain or use condoms for at least 8 weeks. So of course, I emailed my doctor earlier this week when everyone started screaming, "Zika's way worse than we thought!" She told me she didn't think it would be a problem, but she'd email the specialists and see whether or not there was any kind of testing I could get done and tell me at my appointment today what she'd found out.
Now, my appointment didn't end up being with her today (for unrelated reasons), but they very nicely asked H questions about his trip, asked me if I'd been sick, etc. and reassured me that they didn't think it would be a problem. By the time we (finally) got home, I had an email from my doctor apologizing for missing the appointment, and letting me know that she hadn't heard back yet. She reassured me that she didn't think it was going to amount to anything, but she'd let me know when she did finally hear back.
So I'm in a good mood, I've seen baby, I've got my next two scans scheduled and life is good. I'm fully expecting MY doctor to call or email me next week and say, "yep, I heard back, it's no big deal, don't worry about Zika."
Except what actually happened is that a couple hours ago, my phone rings, and I hear, "Hi, my name is Dr. _____ (yeah, I totally don't remember her name) with high risk obstetrics." So that was a huge heart plummeting moment. We talked for quite a long time, but what it boils down to is that she still think it will be okay in the end. But she does think that I'm going to qualify for testing. Apparently it has to be cleared by each county's department of public health (and she's in a different county than me so she was sending them my info). I'll probably hear back from them on Monday at this point, and she expects that they'll want me to come in and be tested.
So I'll do a blood draw and it'll take a couple weeks for me to get results back from that. Even if they're negative though, I'll still have to actually go in and do my anatomy scan through the high risk doctor's office instead and get it cleared through her. Then even if it's negative, I'll have to go in during the third tri for another scan with her office where they take a particularly detailed look at the baby's head to make sure everything is okay. And if anything comes back positive at any point for possible Zika or associated birth defects, then we're talking about lots more testing and possible recommendations of termination of the pregnancy, etc. etc.
So... now I'm freaked out. She emailed me after and ended it with, "Hope you have a wonderful weekend and aren't too worried about this." But I kind of am worried about it. A lot. And it's killing me that, you know, we could have just skipped a couple cycles but we didn't because all the information at the time said it was okay not to. I feel like I was unknowingly stupid and selfish. And just BLARGH.
Anyway, so I think I kind of belong here now? I'll have appointments with both my regular OB and the high risk OB, but hopefully everything will be normal through all of them and I'll get the high risk label removed sometime in the 3rd tri?
Me: 30 DH: 32 ~~ TTC #1: Sep 2015 ~~ BFP: Mar 2016 ~~ Daughter: Nov 2016 TTC #2: April 2018 ~~ BFP: May 2018 ~~ EDD: January 2019
Hey @MrsDho11 fellow 'possible' Zika exposure here as well and also high risk due to a stillborn son. Did they tell you it would be a couple weeks for results? The test needs to be sent both to your state health department and the CDC which they say takes 6 weeks. Spoiler the government is slow and my hospital has yet to get a single result back and it's probably going to be taking closer to 8 weeks. In our hospital system the genetics team handles all Zika cases so that's who I saw and had an hour long meeting with. Be prepared for not many answers along the way because little is known. The CDC's recommendation for women with possible Zika exposure is 'increased monitoring with ultrasound'. My hospital is doing every 4 weeks so they can track the size of the skull.
I feel like a complete ass for exposing myself so I know how you feel.
@EmmieAnn22 - she did warn me that it would take a while to get the results, though I thought the timeframe she listed was shorter than six weeks. Ugh. She only mentioned the extra third tri scan, but I suppose I should email her and asks if she can/wants to run the NT scan in a few weeks through her office as well.
Me: 30 DH: 32 ~~ TTC #1: Sep 2015 ~~ BFP: Mar 2016 ~~ Daughter: Nov 2016 TTC #2: April 2018 ~~ BFP: May 2018 ~~ EDD: January 2019
@MrsDho11 Just wanted to let you know that I got my Zika results back. It took 4 weeks so obviously things are starting to move along quicker. We also talked about ultrasounds and she said the CDC has since changed their recommendations on ultrasounds and now are just recommending 12 and 20 weeks initially. It's such a crazy rollercoaster.
@EmmieAnn22 - I hope your test results were good? And that's crazy, thanks! I guess I need to get back in touch with the high risk doc and see if my NT scan does need to move to her office after all... although I'm not finding anything on the CDC website right now that indicates this change. I'll keep an eye out over the next couple of days so that I can link to something when I ask!
Me: 30 DH: 32 ~~ TTC #1: Sep 2015 ~~ BFP: Mar 2016 ~~ Daughter: Nov 2016 TTC #2: April 2018 ~~ BFP: May 2018 ~~ EDD: January 2019
@MrsDho11 Yes my results came back negative. Also, it took 5 weeks for results..... I forgot how far along I am. I think the CDC's recommendations leave some room for interpretation on care for women at risk but with a negative result. As initially told to me a negative may mean you were still infected at some point and it's out of your system. Perhaps they are seeing that isn't the case so a negative truly is a negative. I go back Friday to meet with the genetics doctor (for unrelated genetic testing) so I'll be asking about why there is a change.
Waiting for labs to come back to see if I'm immune/have fifths disease. The whole family got hand foot and mouth disease, me included, and although HFMD has low risk while pregnant (if you don't get a high fever), it is similar to fifths disease in symptoms which could lead to misdiagnosis. My Dr is being cautious and wants to make sure I wasn't exposed to fifths disease instead. This could open a whole new area of high risk for me, but FX I wasn't exposed to it or at least am immune.
@banfrog Sounds like you have a great doctor. Hope you get your test results back soon. FX everything comes back soon and negative. High risk is stressful enough without other issues piled on top.
@TinyAlligator What was the fluke from last pregnancy? Maybe I missed it or you don't want to go into detail. Sorry if either of those are the case I was just wondering.
I've only got one more hurdle to clear for the 1st trimester. My husband is a carrier for 3 genetic disorders so I'm getting screened tomorrow hopefully the results come in fast and and are good so I can relax for a little of this pregnancy.
@EmmieAnn22 IUGR and velementious cord insertion that led to a c/s at 36w and a 3lb baby. Basically she stopped growing. I also have a bicornuate uterus, but docs believe it was the cord insertion that caused the iugr.
TinyAlligator born @ 36w, 3lb2oz, IUGR BabyFlamingo due 11/30/16
@MrsDho11 and @EmmieAnn22 I'm also "high -risk" for Zika, because H and I were in Puerto Vallarta the month before we got pregnant. We TTA that cycle and used a ridiculous amount of bug spray. Between the 2 of us, H possibly got 1 mosquito bite. There have been no cases of Zika reported for 100 miles of where we stayed, so I'm pretty sure we are fine. But we still will have to get additional scans after the anatomy scan, since I didn't qualify for the blood test.
Doctors along with the public health community are figuring this out as they go along because everything about it is so new. It's so important to realize that the majority of these case of being transmitted in areas with indigenous populations living without mosquito nets, NOT resorts that spray for mosquitos. Every report I've read about an American who has brought back the disease has involved " voluntourism" outside the typical tourist area. It's scary to be treated as high-risk, but try not to let it freak you out as your risks are still very very low!
Question: I haven't been able to determine this by searching online, but my pregnancy (and any future ones presumably) was classified as high-risk because my husband was born with a congenital heart defect that could possibly be passed on. I have been referred to a perinatal doctor for extra care and observation. Does anyone know if any of the genetic testing will show whether it's something he can pass on? We aren't planning on doing really any tests unless our doctors recommend them. My first perinatal doctor visit isn't for a few more weeks so I'm just trying to get an idea of what to expect.
Background, in case it helps answer my question, he had an Atrial Septal Defect that was repaired/patched when he was 3. We don't really have a way to know if they determined what caused his heart defect (or if it's a family thing) due to most of his family has passed away already.
@PurpleBrunette I would think that what they're going to do is some more detailed scans of the heart? Make sure all is developing correctly there so you can prepared for possible surgeries. That's my best guess. I don't think there is a blood test specifically for checking out heart defects. But I could be completely wrong on my guess here.
TinyAlligator born @ 36w, 3lb2oz, IUGR BabyFlamingo due 11/30/16
@PurpleBrunette I'm no expert but have talked with genetics doctors about heart issues so here is what I know. Is it a genetic disorder that caused the issue? All they can test for are known genetic issues and if he is a carrier for those. My husband's family has a genetic disorder that causes weakening of the heart normally later in life. It's now affected two generations but since the gene causing it is unknown no testing can be done to see if he is a carrier. My guess is if it wasn't a specific genetic disorder causing your husbands issue and you don't know if it's hereditary, therefore no genetic studies done on the family, you can't test for it. Not a great answer I know. I'm assuming there will be some detailed ultrasounds of the heart to make sure all is developing well that's the best they can do.
@MrsDho11 and @banfrog Thanks ladies. I've got a 2-3 week wait for results. Luckily, we've got a weekend trip to Chicago planned so hopefully that will make the wait go by faster.
@chloe97 Thanks for the info. My docotors really haven't been all that concerned with my risk but there are protocols they have to follow. I'm high risk for other reasons and Zika was just another thing to pile ontop of my nerves.
That's really unfortunate that you don't qualify for the testing. I've been witnessing first hand as hospitals and the CDC figure this out. When my blood work was originally drawn the CDC wasn't sure of the accuracy of the test x amount of weeks after exposure. So my hospital was treating all women even with a negative result as a possible positive. 6 weeks later I get my results and the CDC has changed its protocol and now testing 2-12 weeks after travel is considered within the limit for an accurate test. So my negative was an actual don't even have to question it or think again about it negative!
@TinyAlligator 'Flukes' are the worse. I lost my son to a 'fluke'. Sometimes it freaks me out how much trust Im putting into doctors that yes they know better and nothing else caused my issues it was just that, a fluke. I had cord insertion issues as well though not as severe as yours. They were able to spot it at 20 weeks so hoping you are in the same boat with that. At least there will be some answers along the way.
That matches what I initially thought, but I wasn't sure. Especially as I thought more about it and read about genetic screening and such. My OB is very laid-back and she just said they'll do "extra ultrasounds and probably a fetal echo at some time and maybe some other tests" and that was a good enough answer for me at the time. Tell you what though, the thought of my baby having a heart defect is a lot less scary when my husband is sitting there healthy as can be.
@PurpleBrunette We get extra fetal echos. DH and his brother both have a condition that tends to cause heart defects (and they both have heart issues). None of our kids have been diagnosed with it, but are considered probable carries of it. All doctors we are involved with (DH's cardiologist, my Dr, the kids' pediatrician) are aware of it, we won't let them not be since it can be super serious, but you're right. When DH is right there and he's doing fine, it doesn't feel so scary.
I just had my first mega-appointment at the maternal fetal medicine office. I had the genetic couseling session first. We opted for pretty much everything: the panorama NIPT, the NT /integrated screening, and also a blood test that looks at both H and I for various issues that cause things like cystic fibrosis. That was one I hadn't heard of before.
Then I had an ultrasound for both the NT measurements (came back normal!) and cervical measurements (came back well within normal, but "not exactly the longest cervical length ever.") Based on that, the MFM decided not to do a cerclage yet. I go back in two weeks for another ultrasound and cervical exam and he said at the slightest hint of anything moving in a bad direction, he was stitching it up and throwing away the key.
TW so so far ive been pretty chill, but the next few months is the scary point for me. I'm 11.5 weeks. I had pprom at 14 weeks last time. They don't know why. There's no evidence it was my cervix, so it's hard to say if the risks of a cerclage are worth it. I also had a small SCH early on in that pregnancy and (EXTRA trigger warning), the MFM said it was quite possible that the sch weakened my membranes and that the whole thing has nothing to do with my cervix at all. So I could go through the pregnancy just fine. Or I could wake up in the middle of the night with ruptured membranes and no warning at any point. The next few months are going to be crazy stressful.
11w6d today... High Risk because of a septate uterus, recurrent miscarriage and DD was born with Esophageal Atresia/Tracheoesophageal Fistula (EA/TEF - esophagus wasn't attached to her syomach, and her esophagus and trachea were attached).... We'll be monitoring for cervical length/preterm labor, fetal growth, and checking for signs of the same or similar birth defect in this LO...
MMC 01/26/12
MC 12/25/12, D&C 01/05/13
BFP 03/05/13, EDD 11/12/13. HB 175 @ 9w2d. Its a Girl!
Madeline Lorraine H. Born 11/12/13 @9:10pm, 7lb6oz
DX with EA/TEF Type C & Tracheomalaysia MC @ 13wks 01/15/15
DX Septate Uterus - surgery recommended
BFP 3/18/16, EDD 11/13/16 It's a boy! Clint Kiszonas H. Born 11/21/16 @10:38pm, 9lb11oz
My risk is mostly around delivery. I was put on modified bed rest at 25w last time because of trauma to my uterus setting off contractions, but that's not expected to recur, not that I'd consent to bedrest again (evidence doesn't show that it actually helps.)
I had placental issues with both deliveries, plus excessive bleeding, and with a new diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions (Asherman's) it's expected I'm at high risk of placental issues again. I had a fairly rapid labour with my second (5 hours first real contractions to baby, though my membranes ruptured 8 hours before labour began) and that makes me concerned how things'll go a third time around. I won't see my OB until 20w and I expect I'll have some extra scans in my third trimester. I'll be pushing for a scheduled delivery for sure this time around, though I think in these circumstances my OB will be more than happy that I'd prefer as much risk mitigation as possible. The challenge will come with when to schedule it. My daughter was born spontaneously at 37+6, but they usually won't schedule delivery until at least 39 weeks if it's considered maternal request, so it's mostly a matter of seeing if my OB agrees with the general assessment of risk. I expect he will.
K.
Son, K, 9 | Daughter, C, 5 | Daughter, M, expected November 7, 2016
Re: High Risk APRIL Check in
Weeks: 10w4d
Appointments/upcoming appointments: I had my first appt this last Friday and got to see the little bean (because of no LMP to base an EDD on). Baby looked good and I now have an EDD of Nov. 4.
Rants/Raves/Questions: My oldest is excited about this baby. He's informed me that he has to come with me to all my appts. He also decided on a name for the baby (I don't think DH like it though).
Weeks: 8+3
Appointments/Upcoming Appointments:
Had my viability u/s last week. 4/25 I have my NIPT bloodwork done and 5/6 I go in for my 12 weeks u/s. On 5/5 I'm doing a 24 hr urine catch and bringing that in so they have a baseline to monitor for preeclampsia.
Rants/Raves: Last week was a circus. I had started spotting bright red and was sure another loss was imminent. Went in last Monday and they did a pelvic exam and found a fingertip-sized polyp protruding from the opening of my cervix. Good news is that's what was causing the bleeding. Bad news is that it needs to be removed and they really don't want to mess with it while I'm pregnant. So they're monitoring and I'm crossing my fingers it doesn't grow anymore so they're not forced to deal with it now. They had me wait a day for the u/s because the exam had me bleeding a good bit but on Tuesday when I went in the little bean looked perfect. It's such an exciting/terrifying journey, isn't it?
Gavin - 8/27/10
*TW*
Gabriel - 2nd tri loss 5/17/16 Trisomy 18 & 21
Hope - 2nd tri loss 12/7/16 complications from pneumonia
7w2d
Last ultrasound went okay, but the amniotic sac was an odd shape (it's pinched on one side). Good heartbeat though. We go in again next week for another look at the amniotic sac.
Appointments/ upcoming appointments: saw the OB today (finally); I'm staying off work until after my NT ultrasound at 13 weeks (OB agreed with my MD that going back would likely be okay, but for my own mental health and BSC she's cool with me staying off until we see the hemorrhage again...or not hopefully!).
NT ultrasound at 13w.
Rants/Raves/Questions: OB seems nice; there's 2 of them in the practice, so I'll end up seeing them both for appointments but there's 10 OBs at the hospital so there's a 1/5 chance one of the two of them will actually deliver my babes. Super excited that it sounds like basically every OB at the hospital is okay with doing a breech extraction if baby B is transverse or breech as long as baby A is head down and there's a less than 20% discrepancy in their sizes. She's also fairly confident I can make it to 38-39 weeks, so they won't induce before then (and will book a CS is baby A is breech) in that ballpark.
Warning this is so long! And formatted weirdly, apparently, because I guess TB hates me today?
So basically what happened was that we were supposed to go to Puerto Rico in February for one of H's company's co-founders' wedding. It was pretty much a "have to go" situation. Then Zika started popping up and being a whole big THING so I did my due diligence and after reviewing all the info from the CDC and talking it through with my OB/GYN, we decided H would go alone and I'd stay home so that we didn't have to skip any cycles of TTC. (I wasn't totally enthused about going on this long trip in such a short number of days since H wanted to take as few days off as possible. At the time we would have had to TTA the cycle before and then the recommendation would have amounted to at least one cycle after. So it was two cycles we would have had to skip for me to go to a wedding for people I don't really know.)
When H got back, I emailed the doctor again just to check that nothing had really changed. She said it was fine to start TTC as at that point, there had only been one case of sexually transmitted Zika, and they believed it was due to blood in the semen, which is uncommon so it shouldn't have been a problem. So we went on with TTC and did end up conceiving that cycle we would have skipped. Yaayy! It totally paid off, right?!
Well, it turns out that over the last couple weeks (so too late for me to have changed anything), the CDC and researchers have found that it actually IS sexually transmitted and the new recommendation is that if you are a woman who isn't pregnant and your partner goes to an active Zika zone (which PR was at the time), you either abstain or use condoms for at least 8 weeks. So of course, I emailed my doctor earlier this week when everyone started screaming, "Zika's way worse than we thought!" She told me she didn't think it would be a problem, but she'd email the specialists and see whether or not there was any kind of testing I could get done and tell me at my appointment today what she'd found out.
Now, my appointment didn't end up being with her today (for unrelated reasons), but they very nicely asked H questions about his trip, asked me if I'd been sick, etc. and reassured me that they didn't think it would be a problem. By the time we (finally) got home, I had an email from my doctor apologizing for missing the appointment, and letting me know that she hadn't heard back yet. She reassured me that she didn't think it was going to amount to anything, but she'd let me know when she did finally hear back.
So I'm in a good mood, I've seen baby, I've got my next two scans scheduled and life is good. I'm fully expecting MY doctor to call or email me next week and say, "yep, I heard back, it's no big deal, don't worry about Zika."
Except what actually happened is that a couple hours ago, my phone rings, and I hear, "Hi, my name is Dr. _____ (yeah, I totally don't remember her name) with high risk obstetrics." So that was a huge heart plummeting moment. We talked for quite a long time, but what it boils down to is that she still think it will be okay in the end. But she does think that I'm going to qualify for testing. Apparently it has to be cleared by each county's department of public health (and she's in a different county than me so she was sending them my info). I'll probably hear back from them on Monday at this point, and she expects that they'll want me to come in and be tested.
So I'll do a blood draw and it'll take a couple weeks for me to get results back from that. Even if they're negative though, I'll still have to actually go in and do my anatomy scan through the high risk doctor's office instead and get it cleared through her. Then even if it's negative, I'll have to go in during the third tri for another scan with her office where they take a particularly detailed look at the baby's head to make sure everything is okay. And if anything comes back positive at any point for possible Zika or associated birth defects, then we're talking about lots more testing and possible recommendations of termination of the pregnancy, etc. etc.
So... now I'm freaked out. She emailed me after and ended it with, "Hope you have a wonderful weekend and aren't too worried about this." But I kind of am worried about it. A lot. And it's killing me that, you know, we could have just skipped a couple cycles but we didn't because all the information at the time said it was okay not to. I feel like I was unknowingly stupid and selfish. And just BLARGH.
Anyway, so I think I kind of belong here now? I'll have appointments with both my regular OB and the high risk OB, but hopefully everything will be normal through all of them and I'll get the high risk label removed sometime in the 3rd tri?
TTC #2: April 2018 ~~ BFP: May 2018 ~~ EDD: January 2019
I feel like a complete ass for exposing myself so I know how you feel.
TTC #2: April 2018 ~~ BFP: May 2018 ~~ EDD: January 2019
TTC #2: April 2018 ~~ BFP: May 2018 ~~ EDD: January 2019
@TinyAlligator What was the fluke from last pregnancy? Maybe I missed it or you don't want to go into detail. Sorry if either of those are the case I was just wondering.
I've only got one more hurdle to clear for the 1st trimester. My husband is a carrier for 3 genetic disorders so I'm getting screened tomorrow hopefully the results come in fast and and are good so I can relax for a little of this pregnancy.
Doctors along with the public health community are figuring this out as they go along because everything about it is so new. It's so important to realize that the majority of these case of being transmitted in areas with indigenous populations living without mosquito nets, NOT resorts that spray for mosquitos. Every report I've read about an American who has brought back the disease has involved " voluntourism" outside the typical tourist area. It's scary to be treated as high-risk, but try not to let it freak you out as your risks are still very very low!
TTC #2: April 2018 ~~ BFP: May 2018 ~~ EDD: January 2019
Background, in case it helps answer my question, he had an Atrial Septal Defect that was repaired/patched when he was 3. We don't really have a way to know if they determined what caused his heart defect (or if it's a family thing) due to most of his family has passed away already.
@chloe97 Thanks for the info. My docotors really haven't been all that concerned with my risk but there are protocols they have to follow. I'm high risk for other reasons and Zika was just another thing to pile ontop of my nerves.
That's really unfortunate that you don't qualify for the testing. I've been witnessing first hand as hospitals and the CDC figure this out. When my blood work was originally drawn the CDC wasn't sure of the accuracy of the test x amount of weeks after exposure. So my hospital was treating all women even with a negative result as a possible positive. 6 weeks later I get my results and the CDC has changed its protocol and now testing 2-12 weeks after travel is considered within the limit for an accurate test. So my negative was an actual don't even have to question it or think again about it negative!
@TinyAlligator 'Flukes' are the worse. I lost my son to a 'fluke'. Sometimes it freaks me out how much trust Im putting into doctors that yes they know better and nothing else caused my issues it was just that, a fluke. I had cord insertion issues as well though not as severe as yours. They were able to spot it at 20 weeks so hoping you are in the same boat with that. At least there will be some answers along the way.
That matches what I initially thought, but I wasn't sure. Especially as I thought more about it and read about genetic screening and such. My OB is very laid-back and she just said they'll do "extra ultrasounds and probably a fetal echo at some time and maybe some other tests" and that was a good enough answer for me at the time. Tell you what though, the thought of my baby having a heart defect is a lot less scary when my husband is sitting there healthy as can be.
Then I had an ultrasound for both the NT measurements (came back normal!) and cervical measurements (came back well within normal, but "not exactly the longest cervical length ever.") Based on that, the MFM decided not to do a cerclage yet. I go back in two weeks for another ultrasound and cervical exam and he said at the slightest hint of anything moving in a bad direction, he was stitching it up and throwing away the key.
TW
so so far ive been pretty chill, but the next few months is the scary point for me. I'm 11.5 weeks. I had pprom at 14 weeks last time. They don't know why. There's no evidence it was my cervix, so it's hard to say if the risks of a cerclage are worth it. I also had a small SCH early on in that pregnancy and (EXTRA trigger warning), the MFM said it was quite possible that the sch weakened my membranes and that the whole thing has nothing to do with my cervix at all. So I could go through the pregnancy just fine. Or I could wake up in the middle of the night with ruptured membranes and no warning at any point. The next few months are going to be crazy stressful.
MMC 01/26/12
MC 12/25/12, D&C 01/05/13
BFP 03/05/13, EDD 11/12/13. HB 175 @ 9w2d. Its a Girl!
DX with EA/TEF Type C & Tracheomalaysia
MC @ 13wks 01/15/15
BFP 1/11/18, EDD 9/21/18
I had placental issues with both deliveries, plus excessive bleeding, and with a new diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions (Asherman's) it's expected I'm at high risk of placental issues again. I had a fairly rapid labour with my second (5 hours first real contractions to baby, though my membranes ruptured 8 hours before labour began) and that makes me concerned how things'll go a third time around. I won't see my OB until 20w and I expect I'll have some extra scans in my third trimester. I'll be pushing for a scheduled delivery for sure this time around, though I think in these circumstances my OB will be more than happy that I'd prefer as much risk mitigation as possible. The challenge will come with when to schedule it. My daughter was born spontaneously at 37+6, but they usually won't schedule delivery until at least 39 weeks if it's considered maternal request, so it's mostly a matter of seeing if my OB agrees with the general assessment of risk. I expect he will.
Son, K, 9 | Daughter, C, 5 | Daughter, M, expected November 7, 2016