I'm currently expecting my first, and the plan is to EBF. Since I'll be a SAHM for the foreseeable future I don't really want to use a pump. When I mentioned this to my mother and a few of friends I have been berated up one side and down the other about it. I'm not really concerned with them being naysayers, because who doesn't enjoy a good "I told you so" at the end of the day, but I am starting to question whether I will actually HAVE to pump.
Some of the pros from my fiancé's perspective are being able to also feed LO, and I would be able to travel out of town for a trip my girlfriends desperately want me to go on (that I really don't want to but am kinda stuck in because I'm part of the bridal party...) But outside of that, I don't really want to pump, and don't see the necessity of it. Am I wrong for just wanting to be all natural with this? Is pumping really the be all end all for making EBF work?
Re: EBF question
All that said, I'd probably still invest in a manual pump. Would allow you to pump in case there is a time you have to be away from baby or in instances where baby starts to sleep longer stretches and you are engorged.
The only other reason I could see for having to pump is in the beginning of baby is sleepy and you need extra stimulation to help mill come in.
With DD1 I introduced a bottle so that I had felxibility even though I was a SAHM and EBF.
Then with DD2 I just never got around to it. Then when she was a few months old I needed minor surgery,and wouldn't be able to feed her for a day. We tried offering her a bottle and she wouldn't take it. It was a real stress in the lead up to the surgery to get her to accept a bottle. We were fortunate we had time to work on it.
So my opinion is that you never know what might come up and babies can resist taking a bottle if they aren't introduced to it. So it's worth offering it earlier on, so that you have it as an option.
Elizabeth 5yrs old Jane 3yrs old
I've been home for 5 months and I've primarily breastfed but I've definitely used the pump for various reasons. Giving a bottle when needed, help with clogged ducts, daytime nursing strike, and filling in a few times at my per diem job. You just never know what baby's agenda will be!
Nursing can be time consuming and at times, exhausting since the baby depends soooo much on you. Don't get me wrong, I'm expecting my son next month and excited about having that nursing relationship again. She was up every 2 hrs at night til maybe 8 months. It was nice to have someone feed her a bottle to get 5 hrs of sleep in a row once in a while. If you don't feel comfortable introducing bottles, its at least worth it to pump to use your milk instead of water for mixing with their food later on.
La Leche League suggests that your milk supply steadies at 4 weeks and sets the standard of your milk volume...within reason. They suggest pumping in those weeks to give you a leg up.
A pump can be beneficial for these reasons:
1. Increasing your milk supply...no matter what, there will be a time in your BF relationship when you need a slight boost.
2. A safeguard in case you end up in an emergency situation in which you can't nurse (hospitalization, rare infections, rare but extreme allergies in baby, etc...)
3. Extra safeguard to protect you from clogged ducts and mastitis.
All this being said, if you can afford one/will get one from insurance...go for it. If not, of course you can live without it.
Added bonus: You could pump and donate your milk.