I know this is probably a little too much for a lot of people, but at 40 + 5, I just don't care!
I've heard about a purple line that ascends up your butt crack as you dilate. Once it reaches just above where your butt crack begins, supposedly your cervix is 10cm. My midwife (actually, the whole hospital) go by a minimum intervention policy, which for them means not doing cervical checks unless there is a need. I'm totally fine with this, but I am so jealous reading some of you ladies say your 1,2,3 etc cms dilated! I can't feel my cervix myself, it's always been high. Not sure if this is good or not! So, for those of you who know roughly how dilated you are, you know what I'm asking! Does it ring true for you? I'm booked in for a stretch and sweep tomorrow (provided my cervix has begun dilating), so I Suppose I will find out then how dilated I am. But at this stage in pregnancy that is SO FAR AWAY!
Re: The 'bottom line' as an indicator of dilation? True or false?
DS1 2010
DS2 2013
DD1 2016
This time no one has checked me and I am OK with it. all it did the last time was get my hopes up. Hang in there. they have to come out at some point soon
I wasn't checked with my last pregnancy at all. DS was born at 37 weeks without any interventions. Labor/delivery was fast and furious. This time around I was checked at 36 weeks. I didn't even realize she was going to check me. My midwife was gone for a birth and instead of rescheduling I just went into a different provider for my group B strep test. That provider decided to "check" my dilation/etc. I was 1 cm. I don't think these numbers really mean much. One of my good friends was 3cm from 35 weeks and had her baby at 40+3.