Trying to Get Pregnant

Should we have a weekly Grad Check In?

PrimRoseMamaPrimRoseMama member
edited September 2015 in Trying to Get Pregnant
We want to respect all regulars (Grads & those still actively TTC). So a good old poll can help!


LFAF Summer 2016 Awards:



Lilypie First Birthday tickers

Should we have a weekly Grad Check In? 118 votes

No, we don't need it.
10% 12 votes
Yes! I want to see how our grads are doing!
64% 76 votes
Yes, but make sure it's appropriately tagged with a warning.
21% 25 votes
Special Snowflake: explain in comments below.
4% 5 votes

Re: Should we have a weekly Grad Check In?

  • Loading the player...
  • Special Snowflake. I don't care if it's done but I won't follow it or participate if/when I get KU.
    image














  • I think that once a month is more than enough. What do we need to see twice a month?
    Married: August 2012
    TTC #1: July 2015
    BFP 1: October 30, 2015; EDD: July 6, 2016- Team Pink
    TTC #2: September 2019

  • I think once a month is sufficient.
    image image
  • thycapa said:

    I may be the minority here, but I loved the grad check in because while I understand how it can be difficult for some to see the bump pictures, it was so wonderful to see how the grads are doing, progressing and feeling.

    I like the grad check in! I just think weekly is a bit much
    image image
  • I think every other week is a good compromise, it's not going to always be there, but that way if someone misses it won't be 2 months before they post again. 
    Me: 36, DH: 40
    Married: July 22, 2008
    Fur babies: Yeti (cat) 

    #1 Boy E 9/30/17 
    #2 Girl A 7/27/2020
    #3 ?? ? est. 1/5/2025 
  • Lulucooks said:
    Special Snowflake. I don't care if it's done but I won't follow it or participate if/when I get KU.
    This
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    🌈  Preemie 2016  🌈
    ♥ Stillborn 2015 
            
  • I agree, every other week is a good compromise
  • I would bet it would replied on throughout a week, so once a month is good and if they want to post on that thread again later in the month why not.
  • raesmith9 said:

    I think that once a month is more than enough. What do we need to see twice a month?

    I'm just getting feed back. I've seen it done (in the past) weekly-- so honestly just getting a feel for the way we should do it.


    LFAF Summer 2016 Awards:



    Lilypie First Birthday tickers

  • I'm with @FloridaStanley. I feel like once a month is enough. The we really get to see progress with every check in. 
    I understand some not wanting to see bump pictures; I feel like on my bad days, I won't want to either. So I just won't click on the thread. But most days I'm pretty excited to see other people's success stories. 

    Image result for green dog

    Me: 30 DH: 32
    BFP #1: 9/12/2015
    DD: 6/1/2016
    BFP #2: 1/16/2018 MC 2/2/2018
  • jhems776 said:
    I would bet it would replied on throughout a week, so once a month is good and if they want to post on that thread again later in the month why not.

    ^^^^
    I agree with this!

    Married: August 2012
    TTC #1: July 2015
    BFP 1: October 30, 2015; EDD: July 6, 2016- Team Pink
    TTC #2: September 2019

  • MrsCase14 said:

    I'm with @FloridaStanley. I feel like once a month is enough. The we really get to see progress with every check in. 

    I understand some not wanting to see bump pictures; I feel like on my bad days, I won't want to either. So I just won't click on the thread. But most days I'm pretty excited to see other people's success stories. 
    I mean, when I was pregnant with DS, I had an eventful/high risk pregnancy, with premature birth. And I would still have had weeks where I would be like "um, still pregnant, bought a onesie this week, nothing new to explain"
    image image
  • I posted this on the original thread before realizing this thread was here. Also fair warning, I'm a total newb.

    What about inspirational and hopeful stories without inviting pictures? I'd love to hear about the light at the end of the tunnel, and I'm happy to congratulate those who are finally getting their time (although I may feel differently as time goes on). But I feel like pictures invite more envy than inspiration... I get it, that glorious belly is something to be proud of and celebrate. Just this board seems more like it a place for support and hope and snark and propping each other up when times are tough. The last thing I want is one more venue in which to fein happiness and dole out congratulations without even a little sunshine or 'you're next' or something to take the edge off it...
  • Lulucooks said:
    I posted this on the original thread before realizing this thread was here. Also fair warning, I'm a total newb.

    What about inspirational and hopeful stories without inviting pictures? I'd love to hear about the light at the end of the tunnel, and I'm happy to congratulate those who are finally getting their time (although I may feel differently as time goes on). But I feel like pictures invite more envy than inspiration... I get it, that glorious belly is something to be proud of and celebrate. Just this board seems more like it a place for support and hope and snark and propping each other up when times are tough. The last thing I want is one more venue in which to fein happiness and dole out congratulations without even a little sunshine or 'you're next' or something to take the edge off it...
    No flames intended, just offering a different view point. I think positivity or sunshine is fine, but I would really hate for someone pregnant to say to me "you're next". They don't know that and it may honestly never happen and I prefer this place over others on the net because we specifically don't do that. There's a hundred forums I can visit to hear pregnant strangers tell me that they are sure I'll be KU any minutes now.
    Agree
    BabyFruit Ticker

    Married Sept '13
    TTC Dec '13
    BFP 10/8/2014 MMC 11/20/2014 D&C 11/26/14
    BFP 9/20/2015 MMC 10/7/2015 D&C 10/15/15
    BFP 3/6/2016


  • Should we tag a few grads to see if they'd come back for this? @saladflambe @mommygrams0730 @tennisbabymama @yogahh others??
    me 30; DH 35
    TTC since May 2014.
    Aug 2014 BFP, EDD April 22, 2015. Low progesterone, started suppositories. Loss at 5w6d.
    Nov 19, 2015 BFP at 13 dpo, EDD July 29, 2016. MMC discovered 12/29 (9+4). Natural miscarriage 1/16 (12+1).
    AMH results 0.42, 1.2; FSH 12.1, AFC 10, dx DOR. 
    RPL testing results normal. Nurse recommended progesterone suppositories in TWW.
    Clomid + trigger + TI cycle August 2016 - failed. Thin lining.
    Femara + trigger + TI cycle December 2016 - failed. Thin lining.
    Short LP (8 days).
    Acupuncture & Chinese herbs starting January 2017, lengthened LP to 10 days 

    Summer 2016 LFAF awards: 



    Winter 2016/2017 LFAF awards:

  • I think doing this monthly with a warning would be nice. I personally love to hear about other people's successes, but I know it is painful for some. I don't mind stories or pictures.
    Babysizer Geeky Pregnancy Tracker
  • @yogahh - I missed that you got a BFP!! Must have been while I was on vacay! Congrats!! FX for you for happy & healthy 9 months! ******on the poll question! I think once a month is sufficient.
  • I'm indifferent on the issue. For some of the regs I saw often & now miss seeing posts from, it would be so great to see how they're doing. But I also understand how for some this could be a touchy subject. I think the key is realizing that no decision will ever make everyone 100% happy. 
    Having it once a month seems like the best option, in my opinion. For those interested in checking in on past regulars, it will provide that outlet, & for others feeling like in the moment it might be too difficult, they can choose not to participate. I think it seems fair. 
    Me: 30 || DH: 32
    Married: May 3, 2014 

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    SaveSave
  • I'm not interested in reading it (I get enough surprise baby bump / birth announcements on Facebook every time I log in) and I don't imagine myself participating if I'm KU. But I have absolutely no problem with it existing as long as it's clearly labeled (TTGP Grad Check In).
      

         TTC #1 --- BFP #1 5/15, loss at 5 weeks --- BFP #2 12/15, loss at 4+3 --- RE testing 3/16 normal, still trying for our rainbow    

  • Should we tag a few grads to see if they'd come back for this? @saladflambe @mommygrams0730 @tennisbabymama @yogahh others??

    @lalala2004
    BabyFruit Ticker

    Married Sept '13
    TTC Dec '13
    BFP 10/8/2014 MMC 11/20/2014 D&C 11/26/14
    BFP 9/20/2015 MMC 10/7/2015 D&C 10/15/15
    BFP 3/6/2016


  • raesmith9 said:

    I'm not looking forward to the random people posting in the thread. I understand that this is a public website but I feel like the "random" people truly won't understand the meaning behind it. I understand the regular people posting on it because we have developed a relationship with them and want to hear how things are going for. But the others not so much.

    In my experience with the grad check in-- there aren't too many random pregnants that participate. Hopefully that trend will continue, but randoms always seem to surprise me!

    So do we want to start in October or do a September TTGP Check-In?


    LFAF Summer 2016 Awards:



    Lilypie First Birthday tickers

  • Why not now? Sept works. To weed out the randoms maybe list the regulars in the OP.
  • I'm not looking forward to the random people posting in the thread. I understand that this is a public website but I feel like the "random" people truly won't understand the meaning behind it. I understand the regular people posting on it because we have developed a relationship with them and want to hear how things are going for. But the others not so much.
    In my experience with the grad check in-- there aren't too many random pregnants that participate. Hopefully that trend will continue, but randoms always seem to surprise me! So do we want to start in October or do a September TTGP Check-In?

    ------------QBF----------------
    It's only the 11th, I'd say do it now. 
    Me: 36, DH: 40
    Married: July 22, 2008
    Fur babies: Yeti (cat) 

    #1 Boy E 9/30/17 
    #2 Girl A 7/27/2020
    #3 ?? ? est. 1/5/2025 
  • mrstmoose said:

    I'm just going to point out one more thing. If there is someone who we don't recognize, can we not flame them right away? Some of us have been here longer than others and would recognize names, while some of the newer people wouldn't. So if you don't recognize a name, maybe ask about it but save the flame for if it really wasn't a reg. I would just hate for previous regs to get flamed just because of "turn-over?" Thoughts?

    I think that is a very fair thought. We can be quick to flame sometime. But why not start not. I agree with just getting the regulars in here first.
    Married: August 2012
    TTC #1: July 2015
    BFP 1: October 30, 2015; EDD: July 6, 2016- Team Pink
    TTC #2: September 2019

  • raesmith9 said:
    I'm just going to point out one more thing. If there is someone who we don't recognize, can we not flame them right away? Some of us have been here longer than others and would recognize names, while some of the newer people wouldn't. So if you don't recognize a name, maybe ask about it but save the flame for if it really wasn't a reg. I would just hate for previous regs to get flamed just because of "turn-over?" Thoughts?
    I think that is a very fair thought. We can be quick to flame sometime. But why not start not. I agree with just getting the regulars in here first.
    Agreed.  It also seems less likely that a non-regular that is already pregnant would come back to visit the TTGP forum, let alone feel like they should participate.  
    BabyFruit Ticker

    Married Sept '13
    TTC Dec '13
    BFP 10/8/2014 MMC 11/20/2014 D&C 11/26/14
    BFP 9/20/2015 MMC 10/7/2015 D&C 10/15/15
    BFP 3/6/2016


  • benicode said:


    raesmith9 said:

    mrstmoose said:

    I'm just going to point out one more thing. If there is someone who we don't recognize, can we not flame them right away? Some of us have been here longer than others and would recognize names, while some of the newer people wouldn't. So if you don't recognize a name, maybe ask about it but save the flame for if it really wasn't a reg. I would just hate for previous regs to get flamed just because of "turn-over?" Thoughts?

    I think that is a very fair thought. We can be quick to flame sometime. But why not start not. I agree with just getting the regulars in here first.

    Agreed.  It also seems less likely that a non-regular that is already pregnant would come back to visit the TTGP forum, let alone feel like they should participate.  

    If it is posted on all of the pregnancy boards that we are doing this I can see random people posting on it and I do not think that that will go over well with some people just because we are not invested to them like we are our regulars!
    Married: August 2012
    TTC #1: July 2015
    BFP 1: October 30, 2015; EDD: July 6, 2016- Team Pink
    TTC #2: September 2019

  • raesmith9 said:

    benicode said:


    raesmith9 said:

    mrstmoose said:

    I'm just going to point out one more thing. If there is someone who we don't recognize, can we not flame them right away? Some of us have been here longer than others and would recognize names, while some of the newer people wouldn't. So if you don't recognize a name, maybe ask about it but save the flame for if it really wasn't a reg. I would just hate for previous regs to get flamed just because of "turn-over?" Thoughts?

    I think that is a very fair thought. We can be quick to flame sometime. But why not start not. I agree with just getting the regulars in here first.

    Agreed.  It also seems less likely that a non-regular that is already pregnant would come back to visit the TTGP forum, let alone feel like they should participate.  
    If it is posted on all of the pregnancy boards that we are doing this I can see random people posting on it and I do not think that that will go over well with some people just because we are not invested to them like we are our regulars!

    ***anticipated qbf

    A PP (can't remember if it was in this thread or the grad check in thread) suggested a few standard questions, similar to the WTO/TWW threads. Maybe one of the standard questions for the grad check in thread could be "when were you a TTGP regular?" That could help dissuade the non-regulars, and provide context to the regulars and other grads.


  • AshVA said:
    raesmith9 said:
    I'm just going to point out one more thing. If there is someone who we don't recognize, can we not flame them right away? Some of us have been here longer than others and would recognize names, while some of the newer people wouldn't. So if you don't recognize a name, maybe ask about it but save the flame for if it really wasn't a reg. I would just hate for previous regs to get flamed just because of "turn-over?" Thoughts?
    I think that is a very fair thought. We can be quick to flame sometime. But why not start not. I agree with just getting the regulars in here first.
    Agreed.  It also seems less likely that a non-regular that is already pregnant would come back to visit the TTGP forum, let alone feel like they should participate.  
    If it is posted on all of the pregnancy boards that we are doing this I can see random people posting on it and I do not think that that will go over well with some people just because we are not invested to them like we are our regulars!
    ***anticipated qbf A PP (can't remember if it was in this thread or the grad check in thread) suggested a few standard questions, similar to the WTO/TWW threads. Maybe one of the standard questions for the grad check in thread could be "when were you a TTGP regular?" That could help dissuade the non-regulars, and provide context to the regulars and other grads.
    ^^^I agree
    TT#1 July 2015
    BFP#1 & MC:August 2015 
    BFP: #2 10/01/2015 MC: 10/09/2015   BFP #3: 12/22/2015 @ 5 weeks  MC/CP: 12-23-2015
    Fertility Appointment: Feb 23/16, Hysteroscopy 03/02/2016,
    BFP #4: 03/31/16 EDD 12/01/2016 
       
    Babysizer Cravings Pregnancy Tracker
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"