I should probably ask the baby name board this, but I'm not, anyhoo....
Why are names like Kaylee and Brynlee considered bad, trendy and made up, a name like Olive is acceptable? I'm genuinely asking, no shade intended.
Hey
@DylansCandyBar and
@wassuphoes if you're out there... little help please. Thanks
Re: Completely stupid question
Forgive me while I show my bias- which everyone possesses- to illustrate my point. When I hear names like Brynlee or Kaylee, I often think of some of the girls from 16 & Pregnant who have been portrayed as immature, irresponsible, and low-class. They may not be any of those things, but because my association of those kinds of names is with those kind of behaviors, that is what I innately think.
Similar with a name like "Olive," when I might associate the name with something a celebrity might do, and therefore think it was cool because celebrities are cool and name their kids oddball things. We all know celebrities are not always cool, but that is how they are portrayed, so we like those names because of that association.
(Edited to add) this is a simplistic explanation of my point, but serves the purpose.
Granted, most of us (I'm playing nice here) likely do our very best to not judge a name before we meet a person. It's just not always the default.
That was long and may or may not have answered the question.
On a less personal level, plenty of studies have shown a name can have a negative impact on you. Some of that is racial/sex based discrimination ( hiring John over Juan or Jane) but some is attributed to some names being perceived as "lower class " or, ah, let's just say "not as smart". People in general are super judgey, most will make a judgment (first impression ) of a person within seconds of meeting them. Names are no different. Smoosh and other invented names are more likely to be used by younger, lower educated parents, and that prejudice carries over when they grow up.
(Disclaimer, yes I'm well aware there's some double PhD couples who named their kid Kaylee, that's the difference between "more likely" and "all" it should be noted I have not used "all" at all. )
Sorry I don't have more in the way of links and direct references, I'm traveling today and am confined to mobile. FTR, Kaylee first has consistent (though rare) recorded use in the 60s. Brynlee didn't register until 95. Olive has been recorded every year since 1880.
I don't care for names like Brynlee, Amberly, Kaylee and such because they sound trashy to me. As PP said, it's something that reminds me of Teen Mom or some other reality show that displays promiscuous behavior. I know very well this is biased and certainly not all people with those names well act in such a manner. I see nothing wrong with other people using them, but would not personally as I prefer names with history. I like them to be classy but that is just my taste. I just don't like made up sounding or two-smooshed together names. I also can't stand original names with made-up spelling (Erykah, Nickol, Katheryine, Izak, Jaxkson).
Have you seen Ted?
https://babynamepondering.blogspot.com/2012/07/teds-trashy-names-list.html?m=1
I don't judge anyone for naming their child something that I personally don't like and would certainly never think different of a parent or child. I know very well not everyone has the same taste or opinions as I.
ETA I don't agree with all the names on Ted's list as being trashy sounding, but definitely the ones what add Lee or Lynn on the end. Heatherlynn, Nickylynn, Crystalynn, etc.
I have a name with multiple pronunciation and spelling options and it can be frustrating to never have anyone say or spell your name right the first time (my name is Briana, but I was named this in the early 80s before the big trend hit). I can only imagine it would be even worse for Brynlee/Brinleigh/Brynlie/etc...
Maybe for the feminine use, but it's been used masculine for a long time. I think @taysun pointed it out in another thread (sorry if it was someone else) and got bashed for it, but she was totally right. The other names I don't care because it's not my business what people name their kids but some are truly terrible.
I think a lot of names like Brynlee, etc don't age well. They're really "cute" for a chubby baby or a toddler, but a 60 year old grandmother named Brynlee? Seems kinda weird.
edit complete thought.
This is why DH and I have chosen not to publicly share the name until baby girl arrives. I am disinterested in opinions on the name we have selected. I believe the opinions will be non-existent given the meaningful and tame name we have selected, but whenever you share something you open it up for scrutiny. Whether or not you asked for the opinions is a moot point. People love to point that out here on the Bump.
OP asked a question and I answered honestly.
I wouldn't give my opinion unless otherwise asked because I know how obnoxious it is to be on the receiving end of someone's opinion when it is uninvited. SO's mother basically told us if we named our baby Henry we must not love him. I wanted to punch her in the face.
As far as the OP's names mentioned.... I used to teach pre-K ballet at a ritzy daycare, and a bunch of the rotten little girls had names like that, so I think of rich brats with names like that, rather than the teen mom-trashy types. Haha!
That's just how it is! Most of the time, people don't like a name because they know someone with that name who is just plain awful.
Carry on.
That being said, they're not the worst thing you can do to a child. It's not like you're naming her MoonUnit (Sorry Zappa... it's gotta be said) and most parents won't side-eye them. It's just the snobbier amongst us (a category in which i am well aware i belong, don't worry..) are going to make some snap assumptions about parents who give their kids names we feel are cheap, even though it's not very nice of us.