I am quite set in my mind to aim for natural birth. My birth plan will have a lot of "No, unless medically necessary" on it. My group OB/midwife practice follows the national association recommendation of delivery by 42 weeks. I asked one of the doctors about their induction procedures for women who go past their EDD. She said at 41 weeks they will check you and the baby frequently. As long as you are ok, they will wait until just before 42 weeks to induce (41 weeks 6 days, I suppose). I was a little irritated (what if baby were to come naturally just a LITTLE past that? Ah but no, I don't have that option) but I have read that indeed the risks to the baby go up after reaching 42 weeks gestation.
I said that I had heard contractions brought on by Pitocin are stronger or more painful (not sure what I said) than those begun without intervention. The doctor said Pitocin contractions are the same as natural ones, and that the reason women say they are worse is because they start suddenly and strongly. I've read a lot of anecdotal reports in this forum from STMs (who may have reason to really legitimately compare Pitocin and non-Pitocin labor) that the contractions are different, if for no other reason than they last longer with less of a break in between. The doctor did not say anything about that, or give information to counteract it. She said nothing addressing the possibility it can cause fetal distress which then leads to them wanting to do C-section. She was running behind so it wasn't the best conversation. At the end, she said it is their goal to help us deliver as naturally as possible. Which makes no sense because I heard from an acquaintance that this exact doctor put alot of pressure on her to get an epidural delivering her second child, and she did.
So where can I get some objective information? Anyone found some links to explanations/summaries of research? Does Pitocin labor differ if the Pitocin is very gradually introduced? Whether you already have mild to moderate dilation and effacement? Does labor go better with Pitocin, and the risk of ending up in C-section go down, if prostaglandin suppositories or gel are used to help the cervix dilate and efface? Can cervical prostaglandin treatment induce labor successfully on its own or in combination with membrane stripping? How soon after membrane stripping will they "have" to administer Pitocin? Does it contain the risk of introducing bacteria in the same way breaking the waters does?
Re: Where to find objective Pitocin info
I guess the use of pitocin would depend on many factors, like if the baby's ready to come, if your body's ready for labor and stuff along those lines.
I'm also hoping I can go naturally again this time too, but I'm not aloud to go past my EDD because the size of my last baby was big and I had complications .
With dd2 I asked to be induced one day before her EDD because she was measuring large and I was just so uncomfortable. She wasn't dropping at all, thus hardly any effacement or dilation beyond 1cm. They broke my water first since I wanted to try with no pitocin first. My labor just didn't progress after walking the halls for a few hours so dr ordered pitocin. The contractions are night and day from natural ones. Natural contractions build slowly, peak, then go back down (picture a mountain). Pitocin contractions slam to the peak very suddenly and then taper off (picture a sheer clif). They didn't last longer or anything like that, they were just much more intense in that there is no warning and BAM you are at the peak of a contraction. I couldn't use any of my visualization or breathing techniques to cope, so asked for an epidural around 6cm. Within 10 minutes of the epidural, I was at 10cm. I relaxed just enough for my body to dilate even though the Epi only numbed my left side. Dd2 never experienced distress at all. She was 9lbs with an off the chart head and it took all I had to get her out. I know if I had let her stay in there longer I would have ended up with a c-section after unsuccessful pushing.
So, the bottom line is, every labor is very different. My drug free baby experienced fetal distress, where my pitocin and epidural baby didn't at all. Overall, I enjoyed the drug free labor more, not because I prefer the pain, but it was such a peaceful experience and a mental challenge.
I hope this baby will come on his own so that I can go med free, but if he is large and needs to be induced I won't fight it (my pelvic floor is so damaged from dd2 that it can't handle another huge baby) and if he experiences drops in his heart rate I will consent to a c-section immediately (I have met too many children with brain damage from oxygen deprivation during labor and delivery through my friend's special needs dd and it makes me hit my knees and pray and thank God that dd1 was ok).
Prepare for the experience you desire, have a plan, but be flexible because sometimes things happen that might not be in the plan but are best for your baby.
This might help and there are various links you can follow from here.
I would avoid cytotec like the plague, have them take your bishop score and if you and baby are not showing any negatives, don't allow them to break your water because inductions can be stopped if your water is in tact. If you know the average length of your cycle and conception date (even roughly) your can look into how accurate your edd is and honestly most of us go in the window we are given.
@DeeGreer
I did however end up with a c-section after 30 hours of labor due to fetal distress. I was induced at 41+5 I believe.
@komorebi, so you're saying that as long as your water isn't broken that even if they start induction process and you don't respond, you can stop it? I know my cycle was pretty much 28 days, and I tended to ovulate (based on cervical mucus and I think some occasional mittelschmerz) right around day 14. Pretty textbook. I think I remember spotting around 14 days before my missed period would have started. I'm thinking I may have ovulated early that time. I have spotted only extremely rarely since puberty. Is it possible that it may have been implantation bleeding, even though those early signs of pregnancy articles say spotting for that reason would happen closer to the period?
Am I justified in being a bit frustrated with this particular OB for at best giving a glossed-over picture of Pitocin contractions vs. natural?
@Sballerina misoprostol is the other name (I'm spelling it wrong, I'm sure).