Baby Names

Disagreement over baby's middle name

My husband and I are having a disagreement over our baby boy's middle name.

He wants his middle name to be "Eugene", which is also my husband's middle name. However, my husband very much dislikes his own middle name, so why would he want to do that to his son? Also my husband's estranged father's middle name is also "Eugene", so I understand it's kind of a family name, but although my husband still has a few fond feelings for the man, he's been a pretty bad father figure overall.
As for me, I just plain dislike "Eugene".

Should I just let it go since it's only his middle name instead of his first name? I just feel like I would feel bad for my son having allowed a middle name that I don't even like. :\
Married June 7, 2014
Anniversary

Baby Boy due Oct. 22, 2015

BabyFruit Ticker

Re: Disagreement over baby's middle name

  • I would say no. Eugene is a pretty terrible name IMO. Plus all the bad connotations with his estranged dad? Nope. Maybe suggest your DH's first name as the middle name instead?
    Triple LFAF IVF Cycle:








  • You have every right to veto a name. I agree with you and if he himself dislikes it and he doesn't have a relationship with whom it is after why the heck would he want to continue it? If the child is getting your husbands last name that is carrying on something from his family already and the first and middle should be something you both are happy with.


  • Loading the player...
  • Sassenach1743Sassenach1743 member
    edited June 2015
    bbiutmcph said:
    You have every right to veto a name. I agree with you and if he himself dislikes it and he doesn't have a relationship with whom it is after why the heck would he want to continue it? If the child is getting your husbands last name that is carrying on something from his family already and the first and middle should be something you both are happy with.
    This! 

    Veto Eugene if you can't live with it (and who would want to carry on a name after a person who was not a good person to their child anyway?). Choose a middle name from your side of the family to honor someone who deserves it and leave your husband's surname to carry on his family line. That might help you settle this argument.
    Vive Les Frasers
    Related image


    Anniversary
  • Eugene is a pretty bad name. I think DH's first name might be a good option to appease him or suggest another family figure like his grandfather.
  • If you hate it, you shouldn't use it. I agree with PPs that the significance of the name is drastically altered if there are so many negative connotations. Everyone you name a child after doesn't have to be a perfect person, but an estranged relative, especially when it is someone who is supposed to be so close to you, is not the right person to honor.
  • Thank you for the input. I'm glad to see that I'm not being unreasonable about this.
    He won't clearly tell me WHY he insists on Eugene, so I guess this is a serious conversation we need to have.
    I half-joked with him the other day that if we do use Eugene, that I get to pick the first name, and he half-joked back "Well I still get to veto" and I'm like, "But I can't veto the middle name?!"
    I dunno. There are certain things he's weird about and won't really explain why. :( 
    Married June 7, 2014
    Anniversary

    Baby Boy due Oct. 22, 2015

    BabyFruit Ticker
  • I agree with coffeeB4tea
  • mattandloramattandlora member
    edited July 2015
    My son has a mn I'm "meh" about, but it was a family name on DH's side. It was used for many generations, then stopped with his grandfather (baby's great-grandfathrt). DH wanted to revive it. I said "no" very early in the pregnancy. He let it drop, then suggested it again after DS was born. I caved and agreed to use it. But when my father-in-law heard the name, he started crying and thanking us for naming our son after his dad. Now that DS is older, I see it fits him. Plus it's a mn. Not like we use it much. As I once read on this board, "the middle name spot is where unpopular family names go to live until they become popular again." I don't regret using the name at all now.

    BUT....... totally different story if it has a negative association. I wouldn't do that at all. There's a few family names I consider unusable for that reason.

    **siggy warning**

    Current Age 35, DH 33

    Married 9/2011

    BFP 8/2012, Miscarried 9/2012

    BFP 9/2012, DS 6/2013

    BFP 6/2014, Miscarried 7/2014

    BFP 7/2014, DD 4/2015


  • LNic5LNic5 member
    If he doesn't even like it that much I'm not really understanding him wanting to give it to his son as well. And if he's estranged from his father, that's another negative imo
  • 4N6s4N6s member
    Is he willing to compromise? Gene? Or anything else?
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"