Our hospital now does free cord blood donation, which I think is a great thing. But it's hard for them to collect if you delay cord clamping. I was planning on delaying cord clamping for 1-3 minutes or until the cord stops pulsing. But I would also love to help out someone else by donating if possible. My OB has no preferences other than she wants the cord clamped at 3 min at the latest due to risks associated with longer delays. And I am fully aware the cord will be clamped/cut in emergency situations.
Thoughts? We delayed clamping with DS but donating wasn't an option at the time. I'm almost leaning towards donation for the good it could do.
Re: Delayed cord clamping or donate cord blood?
There actually was a really good thread a while back about donation vs banking - which I know is not your question - but in that thread some ladies shared their stories about how donation made a difference to their families. I'm sure you could find it with the search just using keywords cord blood.
I'd definitely discuss with your Dr about your wishes to donate (if you decide to donate) and see how she can help you accomplish both goals. Thanks for considering this! I wanted to donate but am unable to for a couple of reasons (my state does not participate, my husband is adopted so we do not meet the criteria for familial health history).
Here is an article stating some risks (ie jaundice) and it states that currently evidence is really actually insufficient to say it helps to delay.
The abstract at the beginning is useful and breaks it down a bit.
It does state you cannot delay if you want to bank.
The UK announced recently that delayed clamping will become standard. Sorry I don't have access to the actual research.
The hospital said they can do both but donation is less successful with delayed clamping. I think we will donate, though. I've been blessed with healthy babies and if we can help just one family, it will be worth it.
I had never heard of cord blood donation before my father's need. My family has the resources to privately bank, but I will be donating. Obviously you should do what you think is best for your child. I can say that as someone whose family member has been through a failed search for a match, I can't imagine not donating. I am perhaps too emotionally involved, but am personally not even considering delayed clamping - most babies don't have that, and turn out ok. (I know, that's terrible logic for most people. I know.) I personally feel that I owe the universe some cord blood.
I am in NO WAY projecting any of this on you. Just offering a testimonial on the importance of cord blood donation. I really commend everyone who even considers it, thank you.
2nd round exp 8/20/18.
More Green For Less Green
Early cord clamping (ECC) was started without any evidence base. Looking at all other mammals delay seems to be the way to go, and many physicians will agree regardless of the ACOG stance.
My major university hospital will do delay and then I'm donating to a bank for research. I would say if you can delay (and want to) and still bank do it. Otherwise it is a very personal decision and you would need to weigh the pros and cons of each after doing your own research, particularly since there still isn't a general consensus among healthcare practitioners on ECC vs DCC.
It's the newest ACOG article I could find at this point.
Since LO came at 36 weeks we opted to delay cord clamping after talking to the NICU doctor. He felt very strongly about delayed cord clamping in babies less than 37 weeks.