I've been seeing some examples and honestly, it annoys me and I hate it. I don't want to send my kid to a school that uses it, but I'm afraid there are no schools (or so little as to make no difference) that do NOT use it (those federal dollars, you know). I believed in the public school system but Common Core just seems to me the wrong way about. I'd rather not home school, but I think against Common Core it may be better.
I'd especially like to hear from any teachers or educators about this - if they feel it truly does help the students to learn, of you feel like you're helping them prepare for the world, etc.
Thanks bunches!
Re: For established moms - how do you feel about Common Core?
I've been teaching for a while and there are always these new trends in education that promise to change things for the better. Sometimes I just roll my eyes at these trends and get all pissy about it because these new and improved tactics can suck the fun out of teaching.
Now with the common core, there are some things I appreciate. I teach middle school math, art and reading so I'm coming from that perspective. With math I like the idea of how they would cover less standards in more depth rather than cover a bunch of topics in a school year. The idea is for the students to have a more conceptual understanding rather than rote memorization of math facts and formulas.
What I'm not liking however, is that there is less emphasis on literature. To me that is crazy! Instead of reading novels, they want students to focus on analyzing articles and other expository text by using evidence of what they read. The reasoning behind that is because there's more real world application in analyzing and annotating text.
I teach in CA and what I just described is a small sample of what I got out of the common core trainings/ workshops. In all honesty, those workshops made me feel like they were trying to sell me something. That didn't sit too well with me. Maybe I just had crappy facilitators? The common core is relatively new and my district just started full implementation. All I can do is roll with the punches and rely on my teacher instincts to give my students the best education I can. So with the common core only time will tell before I have to get with another educational trend.
Edited because sometimes it's hard to type on a phone in a moving vehicle while my DH is talking to me. I'm sure I've left some grammatical errors.
I get with these math situations they are trying to teach how to approach a mathematical problem from various ways to arrive at the answer. But I've seen parents post on fb where their kid got the answer wrong but the question was still counted as correct because they used the 'skipping method' properly (or something - whatever they called it). So then I'm like - so what if you used the correct method - in real life if you used this method to pay your bills and sent the wrong amount, your bank doesn't give a crap. You didn't send the correct amount.
As for specific examples, a friend shared this on fb from some article, and its a fair example of making something that seems simple to me extra complicated.
I do appreciate your input tho, cause I have huge respect for teachers and know that I could be letting my annoyance cloud my judgement. That's why I wanted to know if you thought it was helpful or got in the way of you doing your job (educating our future)
I'll search for some more examples, but for now I have this one -
https://madworldnews.com/angry-mother-destroys-common-core-writing-sons-test/
Maybe I'm only ever seeing the worst of the worst (totally possible) so I'm over-hyping it. Thanks for the teachers input, regardless, ladies
Seems in general most teachers feel like the teachers that posted above. There will be something, it will keep changing, they have seen worse. Public education in whatever school system you're in will continue to be what it is, CCSS or not. Maybe you think it's great, maybe you think your district is terrible, but I honestly can't imagine anyone homeschooling because of the common core. It's truly not dictating content as much as these (admittedly at face value - ridiculous!) examples suggest. If you're against something you can always take things out of context and find ways to ridicule it. I'm not saying it doesn't have it's flaws (I have more trouble with the lower grades/kinders and developmentally inappropriate expectations), but especially since we have 5 or more years until these J15 babies would be affected, I say let's just wait and see what happens before getting too concerned. Definitely might not even be an issue by then!
The idea of those admittedly stupid looking worksheets is for students to begin manipulating numbers rather than apply a set of rules to solve. This is so that later when they encounter problems where there is no obvious formula for solving they have a deep enough understanding of how numbers work that they can literally invent their own method to solve. You can do a math problem lots of different ways. My husband is an engineer and there is a HUGE difference in success between the ones who only know how to plug in formulas and ones who can actually find solutions to complex real world engineering issues. I imagine it's the same for other STEM fields. You want a doctor who can adapt her knowledge to your particular set of real world circumstances rather than simply apply the recommended dosage and numbers in a text book to all of her patients.
If you have a public library near you, chances are they have resources for new parents about preparing your child for school from infancy. Many libraries now have "baby lapsit" programs that newborns and their caregivers can attend as soon as you're ready to take baby out of the house. Great parent/baby bonding time, plus they'll work in ways to develop the skills that are needed, even at such a young age. Most libraries pay attention to Common Core and while they don't strictly adhere to it, they try to adapt their services to support it. Many libraries are modeling their services off of the Every Child Ready to Read program, which basically says that if parents incorporate the practices of playing, talking, singing, reading, and writing into their daily routine with their children who aren't in school yet, it'll help with the development of literacy skills. For newborns it's mostly parents talking to, playing with, singing to, and reading to their babies, but it's a great place to start!
Jumping off my soap box now - point is, when in doubt, try the library!
I'm not trying to set my kid up to be an academic genius, I just want my kid to enjoy learning. The library sounds like a great place to start and I'm totally into it.
ETA I'm totally going to check into the newborn lap-sit once I get my feet under me as a mom and could use some time out of the house. Would probably help with social skills, too (for both me and baby). Thanks for letting me know they have programs for parents with babies that young, I wouldn't have expected it
ETA again - I actually have a bunch of books to donate so I'll ask about it when I drop them off sometime in the coming weeks
Like what other posters have said, the common core is a set of standards not a method of teaching. There's a bunch of tips/ tricks in teaching that are supposed to make things easier. This is especially true for math. Unfortunately, kids don't always understand the "why" behind these strategies, it becomes another set of steps to remember. I hope that made sense!
Anyway, I'm glad you started this thread. It encouraged healthy dialogue about education. I think it's pretty cool you're thinking about your child's schooling in the future. It's also a great idea to start reading to your LO early to develop a love for books. That will definitely put ewok on the right track!
Now, with this being said, I completely understand the frustration parents are experiencing. The implementation of more vigorous state mandated testing was not an appropriate response to supporting a new set of standards. Also, we had textbook companies going crazy without little knowledge with what the standarda said to make a buck with new textbooks. It all depends on how your school district, administration, and teachers responded to the new standards but probably more importantly the new tests and resources.
I will also say, that at the elementary level, I imagine there was some frustration for the teachers. If your an elementary teacher, you didn't go to school to be a math expert like secondary and post-secondary educators did. It would be very helpful to have an understanding of the goal of the math curriculum for the entire 13 years but that's completely unreasonable. Hopefully your administration has brought in math experts to work with the elementary teachers to make the connections and see the value of the standards. I really wish we had content coaches (math, science, literature, etc) for elementary schools- elementary teachers have plenty on their plates as it is and deserve to be supported. Thanks for letting me share!
Also they now have tricks to help them with the formulas that go with physical science.
Formerly known as Kate08young
August '18 Siggy April Showers:
Married: 7/22/14
Baby L: 8/4/2015 August 2015 Moms
Baby E: 11/18/2016 December 2016 Moms
TTC #3 08/2017 BFP 11/27/2017.
Twin B lost 11/22/2017, Twin A doing well.
Really really grateful for all the advice and input on this. Thanks so much to everyone!