June 2015 Moms

HD live ultra sound

any one else disappointed with there 3d or HD live ultrasounds? This was our second time coming back and the pictures them selves just look kind of scary, I was hoping for a cute profile picture of our twin girls at 26 weeks but they just look bumpy and odd ! Not what I had hoped for :(

Re: HD live ultra sound

  • That's normal for a 3D.
  • Loading the player...
  • Yeah, they don't really have much fat yet (especially twins, I'd imagine) and at 26 weeks they aren't meant to be cute. Sorry you spent money on something that was impossible from the get go! Kind of makes you feel like those places are just out to make money.
  • Yes I'm irritated ! $106 later and only pictures of one baby grrr
  • Maybe it's because it's twins.. And harder to see? I got really good pictures this time. She did sleep the whole time but they weren't terrible. Also the Dr. Said it has a good bit to do with how much space /fluid the baby has around them. The more fluid the better the quality picture.
  • It's recommended to wait until at least 30 wks to have one
  • I had written this off before, and now I kind of want to do this! Anyone else have positive/negative experiences to share?
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"