Has anyone heard of this ? I went yestersay and the tech told me about it apparently you can guess gender "97% accuracy " based of the side of your body the placenta attaches . Right side is boy and left side is girl. Well mine was on the right side so he said possibly a boy ... not to sure. Any mommy's have this with previous pregnancys? Was it correct ? I also Googled and read some stuff on it just bc I had never heard that until yesterday                
                             
        
Re: Placenta gender predictor
CONGRATULATIONS!
There's a 50% chance that you're wrong! But, squeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!
Aug15 January Siggy: Favorite Mean Girl
roll tide.
my ute: stalk it. stalk it real good
If you look to the right, you will find the search function. There have been multiple posts about this. Or even just flip back a couple of pages. . .
Oh, yeah and it's not accurate.
Lmao :-SS
That might be the reason for being able to handle being told to search or use ALL of their resources.
Formerly known as Kate08young
August '18 Siggy April Showers:
Married: 7/22/14
Baby L: 8/4/2015 August 2015 Moms
Baby E: 11/18/2016 December 2016 Moms
TTC #3 08/2017 BFP 11/27/2017.
Twin B lost 11/22/2017, Twin A doing well.
Aug15 January Siggy: Favorite Mean Girl
roll tide.
my ute: stalk it. stalk it real good
Baby #2 due August 2015
DS1 -6/25/11
DS2 -3/23/13
Missed MC D&C 8/26/14
DD - 8/26/15
LO#4 due 5/30/17
You asked.
And the ladies here gave you and overwhelming answer of "No. It is not accurate. It's asinine and theoretical with the accuracy rate of garbage."
That was the honest answer to your question. Apparently the honest answer wasn't what you wanted? Did you want someone to lie to you?
Being educated doesn't make us mean.
Despite what your mother told you, there are such things as stupid questions. Questions that have been asked and answered multiple times fall into the category.
Also just because you can read an article doesn't make it a good article. Source checking is important. Also having peer reviewed work is paramount to being able to publish with any credibility.
In a 'quick' Google search, the first 8 pages show nothing close to what would be accepted as a credible source by anyone who has standards of research.
Formerly known as Kate08young
August '18 Siggy April Showers:
Married: 7/22/14
Baby L: 8/4/2015 August 2015 Moms
Baby E: 11/18/2016 December 2016 Moms
TTC #3 08/2017 BFP 11/27/2017.
Twin B lost 11/22/2017, Twin A doing well.
BTW-I don't believe in either of these methods. I have a 50% chance of a boy and a 50% chance of a girl. Just wanted to put it out there.
2, Its not just an opinion. There are facts about scientific publishing that are FACTS no matter how ignorant you may be.
I didn't say that I have an opinion about the Ramzi Method. I was merely pointing out that while you said you did 'research' you have yet to provide proof that your research and sources are credible, or that you actually understand that Scientific Publishing has rules, and unless you dug up some seriously old resources, you didn't follow these rules in your 'research'.
Typically Stage exit is to the right.
Edited to add: Also your 'Girl if you don't get your miserable ass TF on!' makes absolutely no sense.
Formerly known as Kate08young
August '18 Siggy April Showers:
Married: 7/22/14
Baby L: 8/4/2015 August 2015 Moms
Baby E: 11/18/2016 December 2016 Moms
TTC #3 08/2017 BFP 11/27/2017.
Twin B lost 11/22/2017, Twin A doing well.
If it's any consolation, I have pondered this wives tale as well. Although they are probably all wrong/contradictory I plan to make a list and try them all for my baby book just for fun, your only a first time mom once!