When my OB first mentioned that the hospital we'll be delivering at has a "Baby Friendly" designation, I'll admit the first thing that went through my mind was...well, I certainly hope you're friendly toward babies! After some Googling, I think I have a better idea of what exactly that means. It sounds like the main thing is that they're all about BF-ing, which works for me because I would like to BF.
I'm curious if any STMs+ here have had any experience with delivering at a Baby Friendly designated hospital. Were there any particular pros or cons about it? For example, I noticed that one of the requirements is that no pacifiers or bottles can be given to the baby. That's not something I've looked into, to be fair, but is that the norm if you're BF-ing (even at a non "Baby Friendly" hospital)?
Re: "Baby Friendly" Hospital Designation
My BFP Chart
I'll be delivering at the same hospital this time around.
The hospital I'm delivering at now basically does the same things to promote breastfeeding BUT they don't treat non breastfeeding mothers any differently. I'll be able to have my baby with me the entire time if I choose.
I want to breastfeed but I have a muscle condition that causes my legs to tighten up and I can't walk. The meds I take can't be taken while breastfeeding. The beauty is while pregnant it goes away but in the past after all my miscarriages it hit me hard soon after my miscarriages. So i don't know if I'm going to be able to or not and I'll be damn if I have some lactation nazi come in and treat me like shit again if I can't.
Is this a new thing having the hospital certified??? Is it something like Joint Commission coming in to make sure they are in compliance or is it just paperwork that's filled out to get the certification? I want to know how they get this certification.
DS2 born 2/22/13
MMC 5/16/14@8w2d
DD due 5/9/15 Please be our RAINBOW
As a third time mommy I would have HATED the no pacifier rule and the no nursery option. I breastfed both of my daughters (DD2 is still nursing at 17 months). DD1 thought I was a pacifier and I wouldn't have slept in the hospital if a pacifier hadn't been allowed. I also took advantage of the nursery...only at night and only after I got her to sleep and with it well known that she was to be brought back as soon as she woke up. As a first time mom I couldn't fall asleep the first night...every sigh, every wiggle, etc had me sitting up and checking on her. Knowing she was sleeping in a nursery staffed by 2 nurses allowed me to finally relax enough to sleep which allowed me to go home in a much better state than I otherwise would have.
DD2 didn't care for the pacifier but again I took advantage of the nursery at night...I was going to go home to care for a newborn and an 18 month old...I needed every advantage I could get. The 2nd night I had a nurse who was new to the unit and had clearly just been thru baby friendly training and I had to fight to get her to take my daughter to the nursery and to let her sleep...the nurse wanted her woken up and brought back after 2 hours....the night before she had woken to eat every 4 hours naturally and so I fought and lo and behold she woke up naturally right at 4 hours.
Sorry soooo long....most baby friendly aspects are awesome, and the ones I didn't like aren't actually strictly policed most places.