For those who have BF older children, is it the same boob that's the dud? When LO was born I tried to favor my under-producer from last time to see if it could be tricked into working harder, but to no avail.
I produce 2 more ozs on average on my right boob on account of the fact that I like to sleep on my stomach on my left side. I should really switch it up...
Spinoff on the supply question with multiple kids--those who say supply changes kid to kid--were any of you c section moms? I'm convinced that was part of the problem but I'll have another section next time.
Spinoff on the supply question with multiple kids--those who say supply changes kid to kid--were any of you c section moms? I'm convinced that was part of the problem but I'll have another section next time.
I had c-sections both times and both times my milk came in full force on day 3. I struggled with engorgement and oversupply for the first month+.
@SPurp13 I hope you don't beat yourself up too much about the c-section being the issue. I think sometimes it's just how different bodies react. The LCs I saw also told me that supply tends to be higher with subsequent babies, so there's hope there too.
Right by a long shot, but left is getting better. I don't pump too often but i think my shields are too small. I'm going to buy bigger ones today because I start work next Wednesday and I need a bigger stash than the whooping 12 oz I have
Spinoff on the supply question with multiple kids--those who say supply changes kid to kid--were any of you c section moms? I'm convinced that was part of the problem but I'll have another section next time.
I had c-sections both times and both times my milk came in full force on day 3. I struggled with engorgement and oversupply for the first month+.
@SPurp13 I hope you don't beat yourself up too much about the c-section being the issue. I think sometimes it's just how different bodies react. The LCs I saw also told me that supply tends to be higher with subsequent babies, so there's hope there too.
Well, the section itself might not have been the issue, but I couldn't (and didn't want to) hold my baby because of pain and the stress and depression that came with it in the hospital. I think not nursing enough and not doing skin to skin was a huge issue. I still can't hold her very long and it's been a month. But I'm going to hope that if I have another baby (doubtful), I'll know to suffer through and force someone to help me hold the baby. I didn't know how important it was.
Spinoff on the supply question with multiple kids--those who say supply changes kid to kid--were any of you c section moms? I'm convinced that was part of the problem but I'll have another section next time.
I had c-sections both times and both times my milk came in full force on day 3. I struggled with engorgement and oversupply for the first month+.
@SPurp13 I hope you don't beat yourself up too much about the c-section being the issue. I think sometimes it's just how different bodies react. The LCs I saw also told me that supply tends to be higher with subsequent babies, so there's hope there too.
Well, the section itself might not have been the issue, but I couldn't (and didn't want to) hold my baby because of pain and the stress and depression that came with it in the hospital. I think not nursing enough and not doing skin to skin was a huge issue. I still can't hold her very long and it's been a month. But I'm going to hope that if I have another baby (doubtful), I'll know to suffer through and force someone to help me hold the baby. I didn't know how important it was.
That definitely makes sense. No matter how you feed your next baby, I hope that next time they will manage your pain better so that you can get that bonding and skin to skin time and hopefully not be so stressed!
@SPurp13 I've had 4 c-sections. RCS are much better than unplanned. I've BF all the kids.
DD#1 was difficult to nurse because I had no idea what to do or how. Everything was new and unknown.
DD#2 was difficult because my milk wasn't in IMMEDIATELY (obviously) and DD#2 thought she was starving (she was also my biggest) but once my milk came in it was easy.
DD#3 and DS came out knowing how to nurse... Or maybe it was because I'd been through it... Either way each time was easier than the last.
Me - J.R. - 05/1986
DH - J.I. - 08/1986
Married - 09/22/2006
DD#1 - A.E. - 12/15/2009
DD#2 - N.R. - 11/07/2011
DD#3 - S.R. - 05/20/2013
DS - R.E. - 10/03/2014
Absolutely in love with our 'big' family!
I'm also a proud Auntie to a crazy little girl, her brand new baby sister, a little man on his way in the next month, and a sweet little mister we will miss forever!!!
Re: Which Boob Is The Over Achiever?
@meggiev123 with my older boys it was always my right that was the over achiever. Only this time does the left like to get in on the action.
Spinoff on the supply question with multiple kids--those who say supply changes kid to kid--were any of you c section moms? I'm convinced that was part of the problem but I'll have another section next time.
@SPurp13 I hope you don't beat yourself up too much about the c-section being the issue. I think sometimes it's just how different bodies react. The LCs I saw also told me that supply tends to be higher with subsequent babies, so there's hope there too.
Alexander Flynn ~ September 24, 2014
5 hours? Braggart.
Surprise! BFP 3/7/2013, Missed MC, D&C @ 7w5d
BFP 12/10/2013, Natural MC @ 5w1d
BFP 2/15/2014...Katia Elizabeth is due 10/23/2014!
DD#1 was difficult to nurse because I had no idea what to do or how. Everything was new and unknown.
DD#2 was difficult because my milk wasn't in IMMEDIATELY (obviously) and DD#2 thought she was starving (she was also my biggest) but once my milk came in it was easy.
DD#3 and DS came out knowing how to nurse... Or maybe it was because I'd been through it... Either way each time was easier than the last.