My original plan this time around was to only take 9 months of the year off, but now I'm waffling. What's everyone else doing?
Note: I didn't post this in the mat leave post because well I feel rude talking about Canadian mat leave allowances in a post where some only get 6 weeks.
Re: Canadian moms: is anyone not taking the full leave?
F15 December Siggy Challenge:
Employee and government pays. EI pays and then most employers top you up more. My employer tops me up to 90% of my full wage for 18 weeks, and then I get something like 50% from the government for the rest. (I should know the exact numbers but I don't- I can't remember!)
You can choose to split some of the time with your spouse but it can't be the full time.
(Correct me if I'm wrong-like I said- I should know this but don't remember and haven't looked into it yet!)
I would consider it then if that was the case.
I'm a teacher and my job is secure so I'm not worried about that.
It really is quiet surprising that the US does so little for new mothers/families. There are developing countries that have better policies!
Talk about another road block for women in academia! I feel like protesting!
I'll be taking an unpaid leave for a semester or two but I'll still work on writing up my dissertation while on leave when I have time.
Since this will put us as a single income family and DH's firm doesn't do top ups in parental leave we can't afford for him to take the whole leave.
However, there's a new program that I'm hoping will continue running where DH can work part time to make up the difference after collecting the max
$40 000 EI parental/mat leave pay out. If that program sticks around then we'll certainly be using that so I can finish my PhD sooner without our family taking too much of a pay cut!
It is rediculous that graduate students don't qualify for EI benefits because a portion of their income is a fellowship. They still make more than fisher peo
I am a teacher, all our benefits are through my work and they all continue when I am on mat leave.
@CogDis- that is sucky that it doesn't benefit you. Again, I don't know as much as I should- but I really thought everyone got some paid time off.
I know that not all companies would do top up but thought everyone got EI. Apparently I need to read up on things!
And as my husband is self employed- I have never thought about splitting time because it isn't possible for us.
Yeah, it is really ridiculous and a big reason why women either leave academia, have kids super late or wait too long and have to battle infertility or adopt or remain childless but not by choice
It is an odd systemic problem that has to do with how eligibility for EI is calculated (based on hours worked) and how pay is calculated for teaching (based on hours taught without acknowledge the hours worked beyond the faces of the students).
When I teach a course I get paid per hour in the classroom, so on paper I only work 3 hours a week per course (so a full time course load of 3 courses a term would be 9 hours a week, there are a maximum of 14 weeks per term in a 3 term calendar, totalling a maximum possible of 398 hours per year). On paper I don't ever work more than 398 hours a year. However, for every hour in the classroom I spend on average 4.5 hours of preparatory time (reading literature, writing lectures, making slides) and 0.5 hours administrative work (advising students, grading exams, paperwork, emails, administrating T.A.s etc.). So my actual hours worked are more like 5*398= 1990 hours per year. Which is entirely comparable to a 40 hr work week with 3 weeks vacation = 1960 hours.
As a sessional instructor I still pay taxes and pay into EI but the way revenue canada does the calculations make it impossible for me to reach the minimum insurable hours (hours on paper) of 600 hours needed to qualify for mat leave as they only go by the classroom hours written in the contract.
Everyone who has ever learned of this reality is shocked. Most people don't believe me until they look it up themselves. I've heard rumours of people winning EI after multiple appeals (but the hope of winning an appeal is not sufficient to make financial choices based upon).
Crazy!
@cogdis that's so
Shitty but doesn't suprise me. Seems like teachers get the shit end of the stick lots here.
Thanks for educating me!
I really ought not to complain as certainly there are people worse off than me. I just get irritated at systemic Ignorant sexism.