Do any of you feel offended by the term? My LO is only 9 months so i'm not in that "over 1 year" stage yet but hope to be. I feel like breastfeeding any amount of time mom and baby want to should be accepted and not considered "unusual"... so why do we have a term to single out those BF'ing over a year?
Anyway, just curious.
Rachel (a.k.a. The Analytical Mommy.com and @analyticalmommy on IG)I'm just trying to make sense of things :-)
Re: Question for "extended" breastfeeders
i have heard "breastfeeding to natural term" used as a substitute phrase.
I'm just trying to make sense of things :-)
**DD1 - 7/9/98**
**DS - 11/9/00**
**DD2 - 4/30/13**
I'm just trying to make sense of things :-)
**DD1 - 7/9/98**
**DS - 11/9/00**
**DD2 - 4/30/13**
I'm just trying to make sense of things :-)
I'm not offended, but what bothers me is that we have to coin that term since it's more common to NOT be breastfeeding past the one year. According to the WHO BFing is recommended to the 2 year point which to me says that there is still continued benefit. Our culture indirectly teaches us to put career ahead of family and will continue to do so unless we start normalizing extended breastfeeding beyond 6 months or 1 year. Many just don't have the moral support they need in the workplace to continue and I get it.
Anyway, same idea, but I feel bad that people are asking me at 11 months if I'm "still" breastfeeding. People started asking me this when DD was 8 months old. The statement implies (and rightly so) that it's not common to continue BFing that long.