I was just in another thread discussing WM's and large families. I noticed the one of the other posters defined middle class as 200k plus. This seems really high to me, but I get that it's area specific. How would middle class be defined in your area? I live in CO and it looks like 71k would be middle class for our area. H and I make more than that combined, but I would definitely consider us to be middle class. Home prices and daycare are high, not to mention just average costs of living. I'm always curious about what it actually takes financially to live and have a family in different areas
Re: Middle Class Income in your area?
I think I lot of people will guess a lot higher than what the actual middle class is.
As a Canadian I can't take the quiz, but would guess middle class in my area (suburb of major city) is around 75-150K household income. I'm sure lots make more than that, but i would not consider them middle class.
ETA: ok I was right...according to the link above its $64,014—$103,577
$38,000 -$54,000 is considered middle class for my area. I live in a military town though, so I don't know if that screws things up since military gets paid such crap salaries.
With my income added to DH's we pull in about $90,000. Kinda crazy that I considered us middle class before I realized what middle class was for our area.
The wage gap has gotten so ridiculous that the lifestyle of a household* making the 50th percentile fifty years ago is now the lifestyle of a household making the 75th percentile. It's shameful.
*the article is clear that it's reflecting household income, not "per person" - some of that reflects the fact that a lot of families with kids are supported by single earners (I've heard stats that close to half of all kids are being raised by a single mom these days) but it counts for dual earning couples as well.
I'm slightly above the 'middle class" for my area per that CNN calculator that was posted the other day (according to it, middle-class tops out at $76K here) and I have two 10+ y/o cars, a tiny old 2-bed house, no pension, exorbitantly expensive health insurance, didn't take a vacation for 4 years, and cried when I had to spend almost $4,500 on a new furnace, repairs for one car, and new tires for the other in one month. We prioritize funding our retirement accounts and are cheapskates, but after that it doesn't feel like there's much left over for anything else.
That isn't meant to be "woe is me", because obviously I'm doing better than 75% of people in my suburban county, so relatively speaking, I have nothing to complain about. I feel lucky to be in that position, and lucky that we have enough to save for retirement and enough savings to buy a new furnace when our old one tried to kill us by putting out carbon monoxide.
My point is more like, if this is what being at the 76th percentile feels like, I can't imagine being at the 50th or 25th and paying for childcare, student loans, health insurance, cars, and having to save for retirement. It just seems like being a family in the middle 50% of income just means you (probably) have enough to get by these days, not that it means you have new cars, a nice suburban house, and take a vacation every year.
This AP article from a couple months ago sums it up well.... basically, the cost of everything has skyrocketed, and wages have been relatively stagnant, and the middle-class in our country is not looking so great.
"Middle-Class Squeeze: From Daycare to Health Care"
I agree with others about the loan debt, etc. While our incomes are good, we're also diverting a good bit of money every month to student loan payments, retirement contributions, insurance, etc. It would be stressful for us to pay for daycare (my mom watches for free), and I was sad to realize recently that there's no way in hell that we could afford to send LO(s) to the local Montessori or Waldorf schools.
So, yes, comparatively, we make good money.. But we definitely don't feel like we have much to spare.