Anyone see
this article?
https://thestir.cafemom.com/baby/176755/?utm_medium=sem2&utm_source=fb. I never co-slept with DD1 because she only woke up once or twice a night from the time we came home from the hospital. I sometimes co-sleep with DD2 for part of the night if she's on her fourth or fifth wake-up for the night, and I'm too tired to put her back in her crib. I have noticed it makes her sleep more restlessly the rest of the night when she's in my bed. Any thoughts from those that co-sleep or have in the past?
Re: Co-Sleeping article
I'm a firm believer in the fact that how ever raising your child benefits them and your family then go for it.
First round of Clomid in May 2012= BFP #1, DD born January 2013
BFP #2 in January 2014, DS born September 2014
Infants that sleep in their own room also arouse frequently, it's just that we aren't in the room to know it. And often, when an infant arouses it is because they are hungry or uncomfortable. Perhaps they are too hot or too cold. They may not like the position in which they are sleeping but are unable to change it. If the infant is in their crib, mom doesn't hear the noise, the baby fights it for a while and then eventually falls back asleep without their needs being met. Being too hot or not getting enough air increases the risk of SIDS and in those cases, the baby passes away in their sleep.
Here's an interesting study on why you shouldn't let your baby sleep in their own room alone:
https://cosleeping.nd.edu/assets/31970/mckenna_why_babies_should_n.pdf
I guess the point is that babies have a walnut-sized stomach. They are meant to sleep somewhat restlessly, whether next to mom or in the other room. Being closer just means you can respond to the restlessness more easily.
I'm just not sure I buy that all babies are biologically wired to wake often. Both my babies have had long stretches of sleep at night (6-7 hours) from about 5 weeks old. I think it's just another one of those things that depends on the baby and the routine that you have for your baby.
First round of Clomid in May 2012= BFP #1, DD born January 2013
BFP #2 in January 2014, DS born September 2014
This. They only seem to be sleeping better because they aren't in your bed. We partially coslept with both kids. I found it to be easiest. I would dose off while DS is sleeping. If dd wakes up in the middle of the night, she now just climbs in our bed, vs waking me up to see what's going on.
First round of Clomid in May 2012= BFP #1, DD born January 2013
BFP #2 in January 2014, DS born September 2014
I reread what I wrote and it didn't come out well. I'm sorry if it offended you. I'm very sure you're meeting your child's needs and didn't mean to imply otherwise.
My point was that many things can cause SIDS, including temperature, air flow, and other things. Being wet or hungry are not the only reasons a baby will arouse. When a baby arouses due to discomfort, they may not always cry or make noises that a monitor will pick up. If a baby is next to you and starts silently squirming to get comfortable, you're going to wake up. The reason why SIDS rates are lower when you cosleep is because you can hear everything going on with the baby and as the link I posted shows, mothers may be wired to do so.
I agree with PP that everyone needs to do what is right for their families. Bedsharing works for us. I can see how others wouldn't like it. Even though I may wake more often with the baby next to me, I sleep better knowing they are next to me.
And I absolutely think that babies who aren't sleeping in bed with mom wake just as many times. Babies go through a natural sleep cycle where they become restless every 45-50 minutes. If during that time they are uncomfortable, hungry, hot, or whatever, they will wake up and try to wake mom.
As a bedsharing mom, this is why my kids generally wake every hour on the hour during difficult developmental periods. If they are cutting teeth or are sick, every time they hit that restless stage they will wake, realize that I am next to them, and want some comfort. A baby in a crib is still going to wake and feel uncomfortable during that time, but if they have been trained to know that mom isn't going to come, they are going to fall back asleep on their own.
I'm not sure what is better. I see the advantage to teaching a baby to soothe his or herself back to sleep on their own. But just because they are able to do their own soothing, it doesn't mean that they aren't waking the same number of times as the baby in bed next to their mother. The baby in the bed just knows it has other options, I guess, so mom knows she has woken up.
I guess I think that babies don't need their mothers every time they wake up and are slightly uncomfortable. If it's too much that they aren't able to soothe themselves back to sleep, then they cry and their mothers should attend to them. I don't train my babies that I'm not coming if they need something; I'm training them to try soothing themselves instead of me jumping to help them every time they stir, and if they can't, then I will be there.
Not taking offense, just explaining my point of view
First round of Clomid in May 2012= BFP #1, DD born January 2013
BFP #2 in January 2014, DS born September 2014
I co-sleep until we decide to put kiddo in his/her crib. I bed share part of the night when A isn't ready to go back to sleep.