Pregnant after 35

Amnio?

Hi there, Im am from F15. I don't post that much on this board, a bit here and there, but not too much. Anywho, I am 38, we just did our 2nd trimester scan. Due to being AMA, it was done at the hospital with a perinatologist. After the exam, with the exception of the placenta being "close" to the cervix (which was long and closed) everything looked good. They started talking to me about doing amnio, due to my age. We did the first trimester blood work, along with the ultrasound, I did the Maternit21, and we did the second trimester blood screen. All came back "low risk." However, the peri spent a significant amount of time talking to me about amnio and how all of the other stuff that I have done was just "screening." I admit that I probably didn't ask all the right questions, or even all the questions I should have. Anyone else in this situation? Anyone have it done and care to share experiences? Im on the fence about what I want to do, however, I would have peace of mind knowing "for sure."
Me: 38     DH: 36
Married: July 21, 2013
TTC#1 (between us): June/July 2013

DX: MFI (low count and motility)
Charting/OPK/CBFM July 2013-present
1st RE Visit: January 2014
Cycling: 
March 2014- 75iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFN and OHSS
(8 million post wash 47% motility, 18mm/17mm/16mm/16mm/14mm follies)
April/May 2014- Benched due to cysts/enlarged ovaries
June 2014- 50iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFP!!
(10 million post wash 60% motility, 20mm/19mm follies)
Beta 1- 85 Beta 2- 2,752 - EDD 2/27/2015


Everyone welcome. Strength in numbers!


Re: Amnio?

  • marijaa333marijaa333 member
    edited October 2014
    I can't give any advice on amnio per se, but could you perhaps have a follow up conversation with the doctor and have all of your additional questions answered?

    If all the screens came back with low risk, I would think that you have little reason to do amnio, unless you absolutely need as conclusive a diagnosis as possible.  

    On the other hand, amnio has been around for so long, it's basically inertia for doctors now, especially with "AMA." So I am not surprised they are suggesting it.

    There is a big information gap on these topics at the moment - I have been digging for answers myself and it's really hard to figure out what to do!
  • Loading the player...
  • I totally agree with you @marijaa333 - there isn't a lot of helpful information on the "should I do it" question. 
    Me: 38     DH: 36
    Married: July 21, 2013
    TTC#1 (between us): June/July 2013

    DX: MFI (low count and motility)
    Charting/OPK/CBFM July 2013-present
    1st RE Visit: January 2014
    Cycling: 
    March 2014- 75iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFN and OHSS
    (8 million post wash 47% motility, 18mm/17mm/16mm/16mm/14mm follies)
    April/May 2014- Benched due to cysts/enlarged ovaries
    June 2014- 50iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFP!!
    (10 million post wash 60% motility, 20mm/19mm follies)
    Beta 1- 85 Beta 2- 2,752 - EDD 2/27/2015


    Everyone welcome. Strength in numbers!


  • One of the questions I would ask is what their own facility-related and practitioner-related rate of complications has been; I would also ask what they do to prevent complications (antibiotic solution for equipment? oral antibiotics after procedure? bed rest? none of the above?). The answers themselves may not be correlated with outcomes, but the process of asking will let you know whether they keep track and put thought into improving outcomes. If they dismiss your concerns, and you decide to go ahead with the procedure, I would seek another, very experienced provider.
  • Good points.
    Me: 38     DH: 36
    Married: July 21, 2013
    TTC#1 (between us): June/July 2013

    DX: MFI (low count and motility)
    Charting/OPK/CBFM July 2013-present
    1st RE Visit: January 2014
    Cycling: 
    March 2014- 75iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFN and OHSS
    (8 million post wash 47% motility, 18mm/17mm/16mm/16mm/14mm follies)
    April/May 2014- Benched due to cysts/enlarged ovaries
    June 2014- 50iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFP!!
    (10 million post wash 60% motility, 20mm/19mm follies)
    Beta 1- 85 Beta 2- 2,752 - EDD 2/27/2015


    Everyone welcome. Strength in numbers!


  • indianaalumindianaalum member
    edited October 2014
    If Mateniy21 came back low risk for everything, I certainly wouldn't be doing an amnio. IT seems unnecessary, IMO.

    I am 41 and an amnio was never suggested to me except in passing if i wanted it (I had sketchy NT scan followed by a "low risk" Panorama test, so doc said it more like "well, if you are still worried" kinda way---I wasn't worried, so the convo stopped quickly). It certainly was never pushed on me and was said more in "passing" then anything else. You doctors just seems old school to me. 

    Yes, the NIPT tests are "Screening" but they are over 90 percent accurate and up to 99 percent accurate depending on the genetic test. They are pretty darn close, IMO


    on a related note, My placenta was lying low and it fixed itself. I guess it is common early in pregnancy, so try to relax on that one, as well

    ===siggy warning====
    Me: 40, DH: 42
    Diagnosis: PCOS
    TTC: May 2013
    TX: IUI #1 with Follistim. Canceled due to too many follicles (10 + that were large); BENCHED
    IVF #1 March 6. 14 eggs retrieved, 10 fertilized. 
    March 11, 4 eggs transferred.
    March 21 BFP  :) Beta #1 457, Beta #2 1350, Beta #3 9619. 
    Due Date November 27, 2014
    TEAM BLUE

  • edited October 2014
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Mrs.McIrishMrs.McIrish member
    edited October 2014
    I did have a double amnio bc I needed a "yes/no" answer after years of IF. Since I'm having twins, my MFM would not give me mat 21 or the other NIPT tests (not really tested for twins). My girls also wouldn't cooperate for the nt measurements. So I opted for the amnio but that was more my "irrational" fear that there was no way this could be a good pregnancy after all we endured to get here. In your case, no one had given you any reason to think something is wrong since your screening tests were good. Have you had your anatomy scan yet? I see no reason for you to do an amnio with what you've written.

    TTC #1 since 8/1/10; Me:41 and BRCA1+, DH:46
    DOR (FSH 24.3)/ terrible egg quality ; homozygous MTHFR c677t
    5 IUI's: 2/11 to 6/11 and 1/12= BFN
    OE IVF#1-4 8/11-6/12= all BFN
    DE IVF#1 11/12 bad embryos= BFN
    DE IVF #2 2/13 BFP/Beta hell: m/c 5w6d
    CFNBC 7 months, not doing well; decided on guarantee program at RBA w/frozen DE
    DE IVF #3 1/14  ET 4BB; BFP;M/C 5w1d, incomplete m/c; MVA extraction in ER 7w1d

    DE FET#1 ET 3/1714; BFP, beta 1 3/27= 197, beta 2 3/31= 1586, beta 3 4/7= 13879!!
    First u/s= Twins with HBs at 6w2d! We are Team Pink x 2!!

    K & K born 11/21/14 at 38wks 4 days

    imageimage

    SAIF/PAIF Welcome


    http://waitingforraintostop.wordpress.com

  • What? I also don't understand at all why you would do amnio, especially with all the other screenings you have done. Amnio was never suggested to me and I have been AMA with all but my first pregnancy. I consider it a last resort if you have concerns and need a definitive answer. I wouldn't accept the risks associated with amnio without a good reason, and in your case, I don't think there's a good reason!
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers Lilypie Third Birthday tickers Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • Perhaps my docs are old school. Im not sure. The conversation seemed more than just a passing suggestion, which threw me off. I had told them that I would think about it and then there was an awkward silence and I was given suggestions on why I would want to (AMA, more than screeing...ect) and how the procedure had risks, but were low risks. Im going to call tomorrow and flush it out and make a final decision. For whatever reason, I figured most were in my situation where it seemed like doctors were really kinda pushing for you to do it. 
    Me: 38     DH: 36
    Married: July 21, 2013
    TTC#1 (between us): June/July 2013

    DX: MFI (low count and motility)
    Charting/OPK/CBFM July 2013-present
    1st RE Visit: January 2014
    Cycling: 
    March 2014- 75iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFN and OHSS
    (8 million post wash 47% motility, 18mm/17mm/16mm/16mm/14mm follies)
    April/May 2014- Benched due to cysts/enlarged ovaries
    June 2014- 50iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFP!!
    (10 million post wash 60% motility, 20mm/19mm follies)
    Beta 1- 85 Beta 2- 2,752 - EDD 2/27/2015


    Everyone welcome. Strength in numbers!


  • on a related note, My placenta was lying low and it fixed itself. I guess it is common early in pregnancy, so try to relax on that one, as well

    This is reassuring!! I read that somewhere after I left the appointment, despite not being told that from the doctor. :)
    Me: 38     DH: 36
    Married: July 21, 2013
    TTC#1 (between us): June/July 2013

    DX: MFI (low count and motility)
    Charting/OPK/CBFM July 2013-present
    1st RE Visit: January 2014
    Cycling: 
    March 2014- 75iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFN and OHSS
    (8 million post wash 47% motility, 18mm/17mm/16mm/16mm/14mm follies)
    April/May 2014- Benched due to cysts/enlarged ovaries
    June 2014- 50iu follistim + trigger + progesterone + IUI = BFP!!
    (10 million post wash 60% motility, 20mm/19mm follies)
    Beta 1- 85 Beta 2- 2,752 - EDD 2/27/2015


    Everyone welcome. Strength in numbers!


  • I'm 41 and had an amnio.  After a couple miscarriages, I wanted to be sure and know about all the risks.  Also, there is history of some genetic abnormalities in my husband's family so we definitely thought it was worth it.  The clinic who performed the amnio had very good history and data about their services so I felt pretty good about it.  Tests came back all good with no genetic abnormalities or spina bifida so we feel good that this is something we can move on from.  
  • I am AMA and we are staying away from invasive testing (amnio or CVS) because I understand the free fetal dna is more accurate earlier, and ours came back fine. If you are concerned, then educate yourself and decide. I determined the "small risk for miscarriage" was too much for me. And the flip side, Mrs.McIrish wanted more reassurance and was willing to accept the risk as minimal. It really depends on you, feel free to get a second opinion (should be covered by insurance) before deciding. Good luck!
    Pregnancy Ticker
  • You might want to find out if insurance will cover it, since all other tests were good. I went with harmony and nt scan. My perintologist said even though they were called screening tests now that will change in next couple years and will replace amnio. I am 42 , he said amnio wasn't worth risk. Good luck!
    ***ticker warning*** DS 3/27/12 born 6 weeks early....my perfect boy !! Lilypie Third Birthday tickersLilypie First Birthday tickers [url=http://lilypie.com][img]http://lb1f.lilypie.com/z5R8p1.png[/img][/url] image<a href="http://www.thebump.com/?
  • My doctor briefly suggested amnio as well, even after my NIPT came back in the clear. Being that I waited 36 years for this baby, I'm not chancing another loss, so I passed on the amnio.

    Pregnancy Ticker
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"