November 2014 Moms

Delivering "Big" Babies

Up until a few weeks ago I had been very worried about trying to deliver a big baby given that DH at 6'2" is short for his family and while I'm only 5'2" I was close to 8lbs. Everyone seems to love to talk about how big babies make for really tough delivers, that 10lbs is huge, and we aren't built to push them out...

And then the doula teaching our childbirth class told me about the recent birth she attended where a woman, about my height or a little shorter, weighing maybe 100lbs, gave birth to a perfectly healthy 12lb baby with NO tearing. Our bodies are definitely built for this and 10lbs is not huge. Yes, there are going to be exceptions, but I now feel so much more at ease and can just focus on encouraging LO to be head down and spine forward.

Hoping this helps ease others fears/worries like it did mine :)

Re: Delivering "Big" Babies

  • My doctor has been telling me I'm going to have a very big baby for about a month now and has even suggested a csection. I've been worried ever since then. I really don't want a csection but they're starting to worry me with talk about shoulder dystocia and possibly needing assistance with forceps and vaccum to deliver and probably having a bad tear. Now I don't know what to do!
  • @Carebella‌ there are not enough of these stories circulating. Thank you! Lol!
  • Loading the player...
  • Thank you for posting this. My baby is measuring quite large, but if I built him I can birth him!
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • CarebellaCarebella member
    edited October 2014
    I am not a medical expert by any means but maybe @lissydee‌ can chime in. What I'd say is that measurements can be off. It certainly is not an exact science. And if you can handle going up to 42 weeks your body will likely start going into labor when the baby is ready to come out and in the best position. Also, there shouldn't be any reason (assuming low risk and etc) that you can't try having the baby naturally and then if you aren't progressing they can take you for a c-section. I'd say definitely do some research and advocate for what you're comfortable with!

    Edit to tag @Cici3913‌
  • Carebella said:

    I am not a medical expert by any means but maybe @lissydee‌ can chime in. What I'd say is that measurements can be off. It certainly is not an exact science. And if you can handle going up to 42 weeks your body will likely start going into labor when the baby is ready to come out and in the best position. Also, there shouldn't be any reason (assuming low risk and etc) that you can't try having the baby naturally and then if you aren't progressing they can take you for a c-section. I'd say definitely do some research and advocate for what you're comfortable with!

    Edit to tag @Cici3913‌

    Thanks, I have an appointment Monday and will definitely talk to her about it more. They're also going to do another growth ultrasound. I never could keep my glucose test down so they couldn't officially say I have gestational dm, but they've had me checking my BG and I was put on oral meds. So i dont know if maybe there is more risk when you have gestational dm and that's what they're worried about ?

  • Thank you for sharing. I've been very worried about the exact same thing. My husband is 6'2 and I'm 5'2 so I've been so worried that our little girl might get too big. I've always been very very petite which is great for a ballet dancer, but I wasn't sure how great it would be for giving birth. I'm also scared to bring it up to my doctor because she might just confirm my fears. I agree there are always exceptions, but this definitely gives me hope!
  • In my family all of the boys and most of the girls have been 10+ lbs and no one in my family has had any unnecessary medical interventions. That includes induction and sweeping of membranes. All of the women in my family are tiny! I'm HUGE by comparison at 5'8" and 135 before BFP.

    Trust me, our bodies are made for this. Hospitals and docs are a bit trigger happy on the interventions because, guess what? They make more money for every extra procedure they perform on you.
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • CarebellaCarebella member
    edited October 2014
    @Cici3913‌ GD can cause bigger babies but again, I don't think it is a given. It can be a reason, other than size, that they may feel it's safer to induce or due a c-section before you hit 42 weeks. Definitely ask them about why they are suggesting a c-section. If it's just based on size you probably will have more leeway in going full term or longer. If it's other reasons, then it could be smarter to be prepared that a c-section may end up being healthier for you and LO.
  • lissydee said:


    Cici3913 said:

    My doctor has been telling me I'm going to have a very big baby for about a month now and has even suggested a csection. I've been worried ever since then. I really don't want a csection but they're starting to worry me with talk about shoulder dystocia and possibly needing assistance with forceps and vaccum to deliver and probably having a bad tear. Now I don't know what to do!

    acog doesnt even recommend c/s for suspected macrosomia.  the fact that they are trying to bully you into a c/s without a TOL is concerning.


    Okay, I will not let them scare me into a csection! Why do they make big babies seem impossible to birth naturally?

  • I totally had an eyeroll moment when the NP at my first appt. ordered the OGTT for 10 weeks when she saw in my chart that I had two 9 lb babies, one at 38 weeks and the other at 39w2d. She made it seem like they were huge. Um, no. It's bigger than average, but not "big." 

    I never did the OGTT, and I never had issues with impaired glucose tolerance. I didn't during my other four pregnancies, and definitely not this pregnancy.

    I'd love it if Ruby turns out to be 10+ lbs, but I think she may end up in the 9 lb range.
    G 12.04 | E 11.06 | D 11.08  | H 12.09 | R 11.14 | Expecting #6 2.16.18.



  • With my first son they did a growth ultrasound right around 39 weeks and said he was 9+ pounds and weren't sure if I would be able to deliver him. I was induced 4 days later and they told me they would allow me to push for an hour before they took me in for a c/s because they didn't think he was going to fit through my small pelvis. 45 minutes later I delivered him at 7.5 pounds. Needless to say their estimates and predictions were all wrong :)
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker


    BabyFruit Ticker
  • Definitely agree, estimates can be wrong. The more important factors than sheer size of the baby are pelvic size, pelvic SHAPE, and fetal presentation. I would not let them scare you into having a c section if it's not what you want. I would ask your ob why specifically they are concerned though.

    Just a quick aside, obstetricians tend to jump to c section because of fear of complications during vaginal delivery in the current environment of malpractice lawsuits and increasing cost of malpractice insurance (obstetricians have some of the highest rates) and not because they make more money if you havea c section. Malpractice is so high in some areas of the US that there are no practicing obstetricians there.
    BabyFruit Ticker

    Our first!!!



This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"