Last week I went to my HR person with some FMLA questions since we will be having biweekly ultrasounds and echo's. At that time I told her i wouldn't be applying for FMLA prior to the birth since I have plenty if sick time to cover taking off for doctor appointments over the next 20 weeks. I was summoned to her office today and she told me I was being placed into FMLA status due to my high risk pregancy and needing to take time off for doctor appts. I didn't do anything but ask questions and she said since she was informed of what was going on she has to report it. I was further told that it would count against my 480 hours of FMLA time off postpartum. Mind you, my doctor hasn't conpleted paperwork confirming anything and i havent submitted anything in regard to FMLA.
I consulted the p&p handbook which clearly states sick time can be used for pregnancy related doctor appointments and that the only time FMLA would even be mentioned to an employee is if/when 3 consecutive days of sick time would be used. Furthermore, she said she would go into my time sheet and change any sick time to FMLA.
Has anyone ever heard of anything like this? Prenatal issues relating to compromising your work (which to mean would mean bedrest) is an FMLA qualifying condition and birth of a child is another qualifier which to me means 2 separate FMLA applications not the same one. HR peeps?

Re: FMLA - HR drama
Any condition that requires more than one drs visit is considered FMLA qualifying and once your HR person becomes aware of it (even though word of mouth from others) they are obligated to use your FMLA time for it. How you are paid for that time varies based on company policy.
You also don't necessarily need two different drs forms as it is one condition. HR may request periodic updates though.
I will also say that FMLA coverage for pregnancy / birth of a child is so touchy that your employer is doing the right thing by just taking your word and immediately applying FMLA time to protect themselves.
edit- mobile sucks
Also, FMLA for time off work due to your medical conditions or appointments is not a choice thing at all. They will likely require you to get forms filled out by the sounds of it.
We often run into women not wanting to take FMLA before the baby is born because it counts against their 12 weeks after. Our general practice would be to offer a personal leave extension after the baby is born to reach that 12 week post partum mark. I would encourage you to ask about that option. HR people are real people too.
@KristinMTBell All employers must follow federal law, usually if a state has additional laws it would be over and beyond federal. So an employer would be bound by FMLA, then state law, then their own policies..... For example they might be on federal and state leave while receiving sick time from their employer, federal leave might run out, but they are still on state leave and sick leave, later state leave runs out, but they are the best employer in the state or backed by one hell of a union and are still receiving sick pay.
Long example, but I think ultimately we are communicating the same thing. Only perhaps that you are coming from the employee perspective and since I work in HR I just have a different perspective.
I just started a new job around 16 weeks and the only issue I could have had was paying COBRA rates on my insurance premiums while on leave since I hadn't been there a year. I elected to forgo insurance and just use my husband's. I also have Aflac, so that will give supplements pay while I'm off too.