Infertility

What would you do?

I have the opportunity to participate in a trial study for The Eeva System, an investigational time-lapse imaging system, for my next IVF cycle coming up in a few weeks. It's basically a non-invasive time-lapse imaging device, not yet FDA approved in USA, that observes cell division and assess development potential for each embryo. It would give me a great chance of getting a high quality embryo. And I'm qualified!

The thing that makes me nervous is that they will only transfer one embryo, and each patient in the study will be randomly assigned one of the three treatments:

1. Day 3 embryo transfer with selection of embryo by the Eeva System and traditional morphology.
2. Day 5 embryo transfer with selection of embryo by the Eeva System and traditional morphology.
3. Day 5 embryo transfer with selection of embryo by traditional morphology only.

I will not only be "unblinded" by which option my embryo went through until confirmation of pregnancy on ultrasound or a negative pregnancy test.

What would you do? I'm leaning towards taking the risk but I'm concerned about option number 3. What if I got to day 5 and they find out I have no embryos to transfer. Yikes! Big risk, but could have big rewards.


Re: What would you do?

  • Nope. Only get a movie after it's over (if you go actually get to use the system, and not end up with option # 3).
  • Loading the player...
  • I go to a clinic that only does day 5 transfers. Their thought is that a 5 day transfer is more natural for the embryo because during natural conception the embryo would be in the uterus around day 5. Day 3 the embryo would still be in the fallopian tubes. They also feel that if an embryo doesn't make it to Day 5 in the lab that it would not have survived in the uterus either. I would rather have my transfer cancelled (which I don't have to pay for) than have a transfer of embryos that wouldn't make it anyway. So I wouldn't be turned off by not having the option of a day 3 transfer at all.

    imageimageimageimageimage

     

    image

    TTC #1 since August 2011

    My Blog

    September 2012: Start IF testing

    DH (32): SA is ok, slightly low morph, normal SCSA  Me (32): Slightly low progesterone, hostile CM, carrier for CF, Moderately high NKC, High TNFa, heterozyogous mutated Factor XIII, and +APA

    October 2012-May 2014: 4 failed IUIs, 3 failed IVFs, and 1 failed FETw/donor embryos

    November 2014: IVF w/ICSI #4 Agonist/Antagonist with EPP and Prednisone, Baby Aspirin, Lovenox, and IVIG for immune issues.  Converted to freeze all due to lining issues.  2 blasts frozen on day 6!

    January 2015: FET #2 Cancelled due to lining issues

    April 2015: FET #2.1


    PAIF/SAIF Welcome!

  • Thank you both! I emailed the doctor and asked about a discount on the next cycle if it fails. My last cycle was a Day 5 transfer, I guess the only risk is that I wouldn't have any to freeze and you're right about the poor embryos not implanting anyways. Ahh lots to think about.
  • I agree with @IFinTN. Something should make this a little more of an incentive. Cool concept, but lots at risk!

    ***SIGGY WARNING***

    Our Story

    Me- 35, mild hypothyroidism

    DH- 29, low count due to a chromosomal abnormality, only option is IVF/ICSI with PGD.

    Married 5/13

    TTC since 8/13

    IVF/ICSI #1 ER 9/14 - 14R, 6M, 6F, 5 blasts off to PGD- 1 normal female, 2 balanced males

    FET 12/8 of 2 frosties - 1 male/1 female - stick babies stick! 

    Beta #1 10dp5dt 444! Beta #2 14dp5dt 2,340!  U/S 1/5-- TWINS!!!  EDD 8/26/15

    "You'll never see the rainbow if you can't survive the storm"

     image    image

    Pregnancy Ticker

  • Wouldn't do it unless they offered me something. Seems you're helping them out, not they you so I would want sometime in return of the risk.
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • We participated in Eeva for IVF #2. We weren't offered any incentive but were given quite a but of research to look over that explained the benefits of it. The embryos are exposed to much less light when using Eeva and research has shown that embies really don't like light. And all of the images help them to select the best embryo. I would honestly agree to it no matter what, I think the benefits outweigh the risks.
    Me: 30 DH: 30 ~ TTC #1 Since August 2011 
    BFP #1 2/28/13, Ectopic, Tubal surgery 3/25 
    Began RE testing 8/8, Dx Unexplained, 
    IUI #1 11/1=BFN Moving on to IVF 
    IVF #1 12/2 ER 8R 7M 4 fertilized
    12/7 Transferred 2 "perfect" little blasts 12/17 BFN
    New DX= DOR, I fu*kng hate IF
    1/14 Hysteroscopy, new clean uterus!
    IVF #2: bcp, Lupron, follistim 300, menopur 225. 2/21 8R 4M 3F. 3dt of 2 perfect embryos. 1 little penguin 
     3/10 BFFN
    Regrouping. Seeing reproductive immunologist Dr. Kwak Kim 6/10 
    Kwak Kim protocol: Metformin 1000mg, vitamin D 4000iu, vitamin E 400iu, baby aspirin, Metanx, levothyroxine 75mcgs 
     Surprise BFP 9/21!!! Beta #1 247, Beta #2 630. Miscarried 10/13

  • @aliciafiggy‌ am I correct to read that if you were not in the study, you would do a 3dt? My RE only does 5dts for all the same reasons @twinkle062‌ mentioned. If your concern is potentially being in the 3 group with just a traditional 5dt, personally I would not be concerned about that at all. That's the only option with many REs.

    This feels like a situation where you have nothing to lose and potentially a lot to gain. I would go for it and support the research. 

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    January & February: 2 IUIs, BFN
    March:  IUI, ectopic, 2 surgeries with 1 tube removed
    May - July: 3 more IUIs, all BFN, on to IVF
    August: IVF#1, BFN
    September:  FET#1, BFP!!!
    It's a girl!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • Thanks for all of your comments. I see all of your points! I'll let you know what I decide. I'm not a big risk taker but I think this could be an amazing opportunity.

    @daydreamernyc~ If I didn't do the study the embryologist would decide if it should be a 3 or 5 day transfer, based on the quality of my embryos, with hopes to do a day 5. But with this study, they do not take the embryos quality into account, they just assign you which group you will fall under, randomly. But they make sure you have at least 4 embryos to continue.

    The doctor doing the study seems really nice and has answered all my questions thoroughly. There is a 93% success rate that if they transfer on day 3 with a high quality "Eeva" embryo that it will turn into a blastocyst. So I think whatever option out of the three I fall under, I will be in good hands.

  • Hi! I'm also participating in the experimental trial for the new EEVA system. My RE said it's a good tool, though he felt like it wasn't worth paying thousands OOP for. (He capped its "value" at $500 -- he's kind of blunt). But since it's free he said absolutely it was worth partaking in.

    It's interesting though because the terms they have for me are different -- they basically proceed like normal (ie the RE still chooses 3-day or 5-day. They just have the EEVA info to help them).

    So...just making sure...if you have less than 4 embryos on Day 3, they would not proceed with Day 5 (and make sure you transferred on Day 3, right?) That would be my main concern, especially since it's now the situation I find myself in.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    Me: 33, "beyond stage 4" endo with bilateral endometriomas (removed Oct '13)
    Him: 33, great

    TTC since January 2013 (with 9-months off due to lap surgery & lingering Lupron)
    IUI #1 with Letrozole 5mg - BFN (June 2014) 
    IUI #2 with Letrozole 7.5mg- BFN (July 2014)

    IVF #1 (Sept 2014) - Antagonist Protocol - 7 eggs retrieved, 5 mature, 2 fertilized normally. 
    One embryo transferred on Day 3, one embryo allowed to develop further (but arrested). BFN. 

    IVF #2 with ICSI (Dec 2014) - New clinic. 
    Similar protocol, but tweaked -- estrogen priming instead of BCPs, higher dosage of Follistim, etc

    image        image
  • Sha259Sha259 member
    edited September 2014
    I would do it, less for the purpose of the trial, but for the fact that my embryos would be guaranteed to be exposed to less manipulation than in a typical IVF cycle.

    Did your RE say what the practice would be if you did not participate? Normal incubator use with daily removal and grading?

    I used similar technology as a part of my IVF protocol, it's standard practice at my clinic, and was very happy with our end results.

    Good luck on your next cycle, whatever you decide!

    Edit: spelling
  • @amyalbert~ Yes, they would make sure you have at least 4 embryos before moving forward.

    I think I will move forward with it. My RE endorses it for me.
  • Congrats on making a decision. When would you start? Keep us posted on how it goes.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    January & February: 2 IUIs, BFN
    March:  IUI, ectopic, 2 surgeries with 1 tube removed
    May - July: 3 more IUIs, all BFN, on to IVF
    August: IVF#1, BFN
    September:  FET#1, BFP!!!
    It's a girl!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • I'll probably be starting birth control in the next few days. I'll let you know!! Thanks for all your advice.
  • @aliciafiggy I thought you might want to know this...I had my ET done yesterday (had to be day 3 due to only having 2 fertilized eggs). It was kind of interesting because they had 2 grading systems -- one was their regular system, and the other was from the EEVA model. Who knows what will ultimately happen in my case, but it was kind of nice to have the EEVA info support their assessment that they were transferring the most promising quality embryo.

    Anyways, good luck! 
    ----------------------------------------------------
    Me: 33, "beyond stage 4" endo with bilateral endometriomas (removed Oct '13)
    Him: 33, great

    TTC since January 2013 (with 9-months off due to lap surgery & lingering Lupron)
    IUI #1 with Letrozole 5mg - BFN (June 2014) 
    IUI #2 with Letrozole 7.5mg- BFN (July 2014)

    IVF #1 (Sept 2014) - Antagonist Protocol - 7 eggs retrieved, 5 mature, 2 fertilized normally. 
    One embryo transferred on Day 3, one embryo allowed to develop further (but arrested). BFN. 

    IVF #2 with ICSI (Dec 2014) - New clinic. 
    Similar protocol, but tweaked -- estrogen priming instead of BCPs, higher dosage of Follistim, etc

    image        image
  • @amyalbert~ that's awesome. I hope it works for you! Thanks for thinking of me :)

This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"