I have to go to bed, but I have to share the outrageous events going on in my small community. We are a conservative, friendly community of less than 3000. The outpouring of support for this employee is more than 1600 'likes' in less than 24 hours.
What do you think?
https://fox17online.com/2014/09/03/grocery-store-cashier-says-he-was-fired-for-hugging-a-customer/
Re: What has happened to our society!?
Jk (kind of), but my brother got in trouble for hugging another student in kindergarten because the teacher had a "no touching" rule. At first I thought she was so mean and heartless, but the other side is that it's good to understand boundaries and respect others' personal space.
Jk (kind of), but my brother got in trouble for hugging another student in kindergarten because the teacher had a "no touching" rule. At first I thought she was so mean and heartless, but the other side is that it's good to understand boundaries and respect others' personal space.
I understand that they company had to let him go because of the criminal charges. What I don't understand is how a side hug becomes criminal assault and battery. A simple, "No, thank you," or "Dont touch me," or "please, stop" would have been sufficient.
I have gone there for a long time and he hasn't hugged me, but he has always been very sweet. I can't imagine the hug went to a person who he had never seen before, unless she looked very upset and in need of a hug, and I am sure if she vocalized her distaste he would have stopped and apologized that moment.
I wanted to try to get some perspective from people from outside the community. We are a "huggy" place. We hug in church, schools, athletic events, etc. It is not unusual for people to be hugging.
I just don't get how it elevated to criminal charges. I am very curious to see how this all plays out. Definitely needing some more details.
ETA: Oh, and then they'll post the story to a baby message board lamenting the sad state of a world in which someone is fired for repeatedly touching customers after management had received complaints. And the sad state of a world in which someone can file charges and have the complaint heard in court. WHAT A SAD WORLD.
I reached out here because I wanted to hear opinions from an unbiased source. The person who started the Facebook group contacted the news, so that is why the story is one sided. And I understand that the law wants to protect the accuser - it is despicable the way people are talking.
Obviously our community is behind the times. I feel terribly for Fred, and while I am confident that if any inappropriate touching happened, it was an accident, I am open to the idea that it may have happened.
ETA: Oh, and then they'll post the story to a baby message board lamenting the sad state of a world in which someone is fired for repeatedly touching customers after management had received complaints. And the sad state of a world in which someone can file charges and have the complaint heard in court. WHAT A SAD WORLD.
I did not start the campaign, and I will admit that there is more to the story that we don't know. I personally don't like the store for other reasons, and have only stopped there on occasion and it was because of this man's kindness. I did say that I understand the store's point of view. I reached out here because I wanted to hear opinions from an unbiased source. The person who started the Facebook group contacted the news, so that is why the story is one sided. And I understand that the law wants to protect the accuser - it is despicable the way people are talking. Obviously our community is behind the times. I feel terribly for Fred, and while I am confident that if any inappropriate touching happened, it was an accident, I am open to the idea that it may have happened.
-----------------------------------------------
I don't think @nmrd meant to imply that you are the one who created the FB group.
I really appreciate your response to everything here. A lot of people, in the face of all those comments, would get really defensive and lash out. I appreciate that you're willing to actually have a conversation about this sort of thing.
I agree that any inappropriate touching (i.e. groping) was probably accidental. But I agree with others that this was not the first time that someone has reported him for hugging when it was unwanted, so it's entirely appropriate for him to be released from his job. I'm rather appalled by the way commenters have been reacting on the news page. I didn't look at the FB page.
"As long as I live you will live. As long as I live you will be loved."
BFP#1 3/31/12 EDD 12/1/12,No HB 6/6/12 (14 weeks 4 days), D&C 6/11/12 (15 weeks 2 days)*Arabella Ann*
BFP#2 5/21/14 EDD 1/27/15 *GROW BABY GROW*
NO TOUCHY. Fred needs to be taught to keep his hands off of people. Unless someone initiates the hug with him, while he is on the clock he should not be hugging people. I think the company should have fired him ages ago, but then again 40 years ago when he was doing it it might have been (wrongly) more acceptable. I can't believe they'd live with the liability of him doing this all these years. It finally caught up with them. I won't even bother reading the Facebook comments, because I lack impulse control and would probably use some unsavory words.
We are constantly teaching our children about their bodies being their own, and that no one has the right to touch them. But we send mixed messages when we permit unwanted contact either to our own bodies or to theirs by other people.