I was surprised not to see my hospital here. There aren't even any in my city that made the cut... I'm thinking maybe #s 9 and 10 may be the culprits. I know they do breast feeding assistance, rooming in, skin to skin etc. Are pacifiers really that bad?
Only 4 percent of hospitals adhere to these guidelines? That's really sad.
No, only 4% have chosen to pay and go through the process of being accredited by that organization.
Also I have found it's a nice idea but the attitude towards implementation can vary widely. At our old hospital they gave me fliers at every appointment that told me all the many ways in which how I will harm my baby for life with formula. It was very intense and made me uncomfortable. I know that's absolutely not all places but you have to take it with a grain of salt.
Maybe I'm getting hung up on semantics, but I kind of hate that they're trying to make "baby friendly" synonymous with "breastfeeding".
It seems like an awesome initiative and I love that they're putting policy into place to inform/educate new moms about breastfeeding. However, not breastfeeding doesn't make one non-baby friendly.
My hospital isn't on here, but when I had DS they practiced all of that stuff. I liked that they were supportive of breast feeding but a nurse would come in every hour it seemed to get me to have DS nursing. I was fully intending to nurse ( and did so for 20 months) but the day he was born he was more interested in sleeping and the "help" was a bit much at times. There were too many different people giving me advice. In the end the actual lactation consultant was the most helpful.
I agree that the term baby friendly is a little overboard. Breast feeding friendly is more appropriate.
I can't get the link to work, but I it wouldn't surprise me off mine is on the list. I know the hospital where I delivered dd was not. They hardly helped me at all with bf. My friend came and helped and they basically told us not to do it the way we were doing it.
They also gave her a pacifier, but I had no issues. I actually read an article about how moms that gave pacifiers were more likely to stick with bf. I don't remember where I read it or I would share it.
The hospital I am using is on the list, which is new since last time I had a baby there, 11 years ago.
The stuff they do sounds pretty much like what they did then-but even then was a change from my first birth in 1992, where I had to note in my chart and INSIST that my ds NOT be taken to the nursery. I had to pay extra for a private room if I wanted baby to room in (that changed by birth 2, they are all private, and my mom went ballistic and they gave me a private for no extra) and I was sent home with a diaper bag full of formula samples. It was an awesome bag, I used it for years lol.
It would have been easy to fail at bf then, had I not been so determined. I think the changes are for good. I do believe that a mom's choice to ff should be respected as well.
Our hospital is in the process of applying for the certification. They have a huge department of lactation specialists and almost exclusively practice rooming-in, and I'm curious to see how all of that goes.
This was a the number one requirement I had when we chose our hospital. I am SO happy to be delivering at one...my main concern was wanting skin to skin contact immediately following birth no matter WHAT kind of delivery it is.
This was a the number one requirement I had when we chose our hospital. I am SO happy to be delivering at one...my main concern was wanting skin to skin contact immediately following birth no matter WHAT kind of delivery it is.
@belmont1785 I am having this LO at a different hospital this time and this is my number 1 question.I had a c-section with DD and they held her up to me and let me touch her with my one free hand for many 30 seconds. Then i didn't see her for 3+ hours. Horrible.
I'm glad that my hospital isn't on there (I only saw 3 for the entire state). I FF for non-medical reasons, and it seems that society in general is pushing BF'ing as the only acceptable way. For all the BF mommas, great job! More power to you! But it's not for me and I think I have a right not to be bullied about it after I politely decline.
_____________________________________________
Married 6/16/01
Eeney 7/24/05
Meeney 3/23/07
Miney 9/15/10 Mo 11/4/14 Wait, What?!? - EDD 11/1/19
The hospital I work at/will deliver at used to be baby friendly. Since we opened a new hospital with a NICU, we dropped the "baby friend" designation. We got an email saying we could get a really good deal from similac (price wise) for our NICU babies who don't qualify for donor milk based on our policies (less than 34 weeks) or that need two bottles of neosure a day on top of breast milk for their bone growth.
It was going to save the hospital a lot of money to accept the deal with similac, but because of it we didn't fit the baby friendly requirements anymore (or at least that is how it was explained to us). I know L&D and mother baby still practice as if we were baby friendly, and in the NICU if we can we usually wait at least 3 days for mom's milk to come in before we think about giving formula. We do however give pacifiers to pretty much every baby in the NICU for painful procedures (IV pokes, lab draws, etc).
*TW*
Me:35 DH:35 Dx: PCOS DS1 born 11/2014 DS2 born 11/2018 3 previous losses Rainbow babydue 12/2021 - Team Green
@lovebuggies1 - I completely agree with your mom. My own mom gave me a hard time about FF my first because she was pushed so hard to FF when she wanted to BF. The irony was completely lost on her.
_____________________________________________
Married 6/16/01
Eeney 7/24/05
Meeney 3/23/07
Miney 9/15/10 Mo 11/4/14 Wait, What?!? - EDD 11/1/19
Re: Baby Friendly Hospitals
It seems like an awesome initiative and I love that they're putting policy into place to inform/educate new moms about breastfeeding. However, not breastfeeding doesn't make one non-baby friendly.
I agree that the term baby friendly is a little overboard. Breast feeding friendly is more appropriate.
They also gave her a pacifier, but I had no issues. I actually read an article about how moms that gave pacifiers were more likely to stick with bf. I don't remember where I read it or I would share it.
The stuff they do sounds pretty much like what they did then-but even then was a change from my first birth in 1992, where I had to note in my chart and INSIST that my ds NOT be taken to the nursery. I had to pay extra for a private room if I wanted baby to room in (that changed by birth 2, they are all private, and my mom went ballistic and they gave me a private for no extra) and I was sent home with a diaper bag full of formula samples. It was an awesome bag, I used it for years lol.
It would have been easy to fail at bf then, had I not been so determined. I think the changes are for good. I do believe that a mom's choice to ff should be respected as well.
Thanks for sharing!
Mo 11/4/14
Wait, What?!? - EDD 11/1/19
Dx: PCOS
DS1 born 11/2014
DS2 born 11/2018
3 previous losses
Rainbow baby due 12/2021 - Team Green
Mo 11/4/14
Wait, What?!? - EDD 11/1/19