Since no one has posted this yet, I figured I'd get this going. It seems like several of us our eager to discuss this month's book club selection, Room by Emma Donogue.
I've never been in a book club before and not exactly sure how this should go. I looked up some sample questions (below) if anyone is struggling on what to write. Otherwise, I'm assuming it's a free for all.
- Is the book believable?
- What is the book’s greatest strength or most serious flaw?
- Did this book shock or disturb you?
- If you had to describe this book in just one word, what would it be?
- What other books that you have read could this one be compared to?
- Would you recommend this book to someone else?
N14 Nov. Siggy: CELEBRATION!

TTC since 2011
Aug. - Sept. 2013 - dIUIs = BFNs
January 2014 - IVF = 3 freezer babies
March 2014 - FET of AA and AB blast = BFP! Twins!
Nov. 7, 2014 - Wilhelmina "Willa" Suzanne (4lb 14oz) and Ari Jose (6lb 4oz) were born via CS
Re: Official Book Club Discussion: Room by Emma Donoghue
I read this book like 3 years ago, and loved it. I wasn't the parent at the time, and think I may have had a different take on it if I had read it after having DS. In any case, I find that it is a book that has stuck with me. For instance, if I'm in a windowless doctor's room, I think about what it would be like to be stuck in a room like that, with a child, for years (ugh, how awful). I really enjoyed the child psychology aspect of it - like how the boy had a hard time adjusting at first to things like grass and not being in the same room as his mom, and how he really wanted to go back to the Room.
I admire that the mom limited TV. I think if it were me, I would just have the TV on all day. And I think her decision to not tell her son about the outside world was an interesting one - not necessarily one I would make, but I see why she did it (more so now that I"m a mom).
In any case:
Is the book believable? Yes, I think so.
What is the book’s greatest strength or most serious flaw? I think it's greatest strength is the child psychology aspect of it (not that I know anything about child psychology, but I found it to be the most interesting). I think it's most serious flaw is the inconsistent tone. The beginning starts out in the boy's voice, and it written like a child, which is really annoying, but that voice changes. Did this book shock or disturb you? I wouldn't say shock, but it is disturbing. I think that's why it's stuck with me. If you had to describe this book in just one word, what would it be? I think disturbing fits well. What other books that you have read could this one be compared to? Hmmmm.. can't think of anything off the top of my head. Would you recommend this book to someone else?yes. I recommended it to my other book club.Review: I would give this book 3.5/5 stars (average - 4 stars for the first half and 3 for the second half)
From the synopsis, I knew Room was told from the perspective of a five-year-old, but all that entailed didn’t quite sink in until about 30 seconds into the audiobook. I mean, we’re not talking about an adult version of a kid – proper grammar but with a juvenile take on life – but like an actual five-year-old wrote it, improper grammar, poor sentence structure and all.
All I could think was, “Shoot. Me. Now. Is this what I have to look forward to in five years?” and I officially banished the idea of going on any long road trips with the twins – or at least not without a roll of duct tape.
As the story progressed, my annoyance with Room’s juvenile narrator, Jack, lessened. Or maybe I just got used to it? I felt myself bonding more with “Ma” – sympathizing with her horrific experience of kidnapping and imprisonment and being in awe of how she managed to not only survive the ordeal, but actually create such a positive environment for Jack to grow up in.
The first part of the book with its world building (or room building?) and lead up to the escape was great. I think it was a little too short, though. Maybe it’s because I’m used to reading suspense/mystery books, but I thought there would be more of a struggle to escape or that we hadn’t seen the last of “Old Nick”? I kept thinking, “That was too easy.”
The second half of the book, which focused on Jack’s integration into society, just got tiring. Perhaps if I was more into child psychology, it would’ve been more interesting? I just felt like I was reading the same things over and over again – especially his preference for breast feeding. (I’d actually read other people complain about it in reviews when I was about half way done with the book and I thought, “Oh, it’s not that bad.” No, it gets old. We get it. Kid likes the boob – the left one, specifically.)
Overall, I’d say it was OK. I felt like I should’ve been getting more out of it than I did. I’m glad I read it, though, because it was definitely out of my comfort zone. I’m not quite sure I’d recommend it to anyone else. I don’t think I know anyone who would enjoy it and I just didn’t think it was that earth-shatteringly awesome.
N14 Nov. Siggy: CELEBRATION!
Is the book believable? For the most part. I think the before part is although it would take a tremendous amount of strength for Ma to keep his so happy, educated, exercised, healthy, etc. I think the after/reintegration is believable too, but I agree with pp-the escape was not- to easy for a plan of two days.
What is the book’s greatest strength or most serious flaw? Maybe this will be an UO but I think the greatest strength was that it was written from Jack's perspective. It allowed it to be more about his relationship with Ma and coping with the crazy outside world.
Did this book shock or disturb you? A little disturbing because these situations happen and that is scary to me.
If you had to describe this book in just one word, what would it be? Thought-provoking
What other books that you have read could this one be compared to? Not so much in content but the way they tend to make me think- books by Jodi
picoult
Would you recommend this book to someone else? Yes and I have many times.
N14 Nov. Siggy: CELEBRATION!