February 2014 Moms

Mom arrested for letting daughter go to park alone

https://newsone.com/3038938/working-mom-arrested-for-leaving-daughter-at-park/

Have you guys seen this? What do you think?

I think this is a major overreaction. Arresting her? Wtf

I don't know if I'm comfortable with a 9 year old alone in the park for hours... But I don't see a ton of other options. This mom would be shamed if she didn't work and then she does and is arrested because her job doesn't cover childcare costs.


image image

Re: Mom arrested for letting daughter go to park alone

  • Loading the player...
  • This content has been removed.
  • magentawarpedmagentawarped member
    edited July 2014
    The girl also had a cell phone, the park was right next to where mom worked, and they had plans to meet up on mom's breaks.

    Yeah, the arrest was ridiculous.
  • I don't think sending your 9 year old to the park unsupervised for hours while you work is okay.  I think if she'd tried hard enough, she could have found some sort of low-cost supervision for her.  I'd actually rather that woman left the daughter home alone for the day--at 9, they can feed themselves and entertain themselves, and should know enough not to play with matches or the stove.

    Do I think she should have been arrested?  No.  A warning?  Sure.  Like @Madisonpenny said, now that the mom's in jail, what's going to happen to the little girl??  I think that's worse than leaving her at the park alone all day.

    **********************************************************

    image
    image
    image

  • These are the impossibly tough situations that led me to not want to work in CPS long-term.

    Was it the best choice for mom to make? IMO, no... there's a lot of unknowns being alone for a long time in a public place. My parents definitely left me home by myself for periods of time at that age, though, and that feels more ok since it was contained and locked.

    Was it the only choice mom felt like she had? Probably. And instead of getting help for her to make a "better" choice, she's in jail, the kid is likely in foster care (either with a family member or a standard home), and both are costing tons of money, tons of resources, and not helping this family at all.

    Suzy & Brian November 3, 2007 "...this one time, at band camp..." ;-)
    TTC #1 since 9/2012
    BFP #1 2/16/13, EDD 10/13/13, CP 2/21/13
    BFP #2 6/2/13
    Baby J-Bug 2/8/14 My Wedding Bio from back in the day
  • Firefly9 said:

    I don't think sending your 9 year old to the park unsupervised for hours while you work is okay.  I think if she'd tried hard enough, she could have found some sort of low-cost supervision for her.  I'd actually rather that woman left the daughter home alone for the day--at 9, they can feed themselves and entertain themselves, and should know enough not to play with matches or the stove.

    Do I think she should have been arrested?  No.  A warning?  Sure.  Like @Madisonpenny said, now that the mom's in jail, what's going to happen to the little girl??  I think that's worse than leaving her at the park alone all day.

    I don't think it's that easy to find a program. The free and low cost ones in my city have about a six month waiting list. Since she was with the mom until recently she likely didn't see the need.

    And she may have thought that bringing her to the park or to work with her was safer than leaving her at home... It sounds like there was recently a break in there.

    I don't like the idea of a child that age alone for hours, but I don't know if there's another easy solution. The park was pretty close to the mom's work and if she checked in frequently then the risk likely isn't that high.

    This isn't a choice I'd want to have to make.



    image image
  • I will add, I don't believe that in MA, this mom would have been arrested. A report for neglect would have been filed and there would have been a CPS investigation for sure, which isn't exactly a good time, but I think that's preferable to mom sitting in jail.
    Suzy & Brian November 3, 2007 "...this one time, at band camp..." ;-)
    TTC #1 since 9/2012
    BFP #1 2/16/13, EDD 10/13/13, CP 2/21/13
    BFP #2 6/2/13
    Baby J-Bug 2/8/14 My Wedding Bio from back in the day
  • Yeah this could have been a referral to cps for education and evaluation for possible resources. Jail is not helping anyone here. And I am in the camp that 9 years olds shouldn't really be left alone. Most don't have advanced enough executive functioning to make a good decisions across a range of scenerios
    But, many teens don't have that either and we let them drive cars, leave them alone, heck we send them off to college at 18yrs without those functions fully developed.  It's not until we're in our twenties that our brains finish developing.


    imageimage
  • psk said:
    It doesn't say how long her mom's shift was. While I am not sure arresting her was the right course of action, I don't think it is appropriate for her to just leave her at a park all day. Maybe she should have put her at a table in the mcdonalds with a book or looked into the local Boys & Girls Club chapter. Going to the park for an hour is different from sending your child there for the whole day. I hope I am never in a position to make a similar choice, this just points to the struggles many working parents face each day as they try to stay on their feet. It definitely isn't fair.
    How is a McDonalds safer than a park?  I can see the argument of shelter, but not knowing anything about this particular park there may in fact be a roofed shelter of some sort and fully functioning rest rooms available. Those things are fairly common place at parks.

    Couldn't the McDonalds be less safe - how much farther is it? How many more strangers will she be encountering there vs a park? The people visiting a park are most likely parents/caregivers and children vs. a fast food restaurant which could have any range of people. A child playing at a park is going to be presumed to have an adult so perhaps less likely to be targeted for kidnapping/crime.  But these are all big assumptions and who knows if there's even a McDonalds anywhere reasonably close-by. Perhaps the nearest one is a mile away. Is that really preferable to across the street? 

    But all this distracts from the broader issue of why this was her (and so many parent's) best option for childcare.  It's easy for me to say "well put the kid in a boys/girls club" or whatever, but maybe she can't afford their summer camp program?  FWIW I googled the zip codes from where this happened, according to the B&G club website the closest one is ~5miles and their program is $350 for 9a-2p, although you can keep kid there longer (for more $). They are closed the week of July 4th - so there's a whole week that Mom would still be stuck even if she utilized this program. Does Mom have a car/way to get child to/from club and then herself to work? We don't know. Perhaps work is walking distance from home and those 5miles are not reasonable to walk.


    imageimage
  • RondackHikerRondackHiker member
    edited July 2014


    psk said:
    It doesn't say how long her mom's shift was. While I am not sure arresting her was the right course of action, I don't think it is appropriate for her to just leave her at a park all day. Maybe she should have put her at a table in the mcdonalds with a book or looked into the local Boys & Girls Club chapter. Going to the park for an hour is different from sending your child there for the whole day. I hope I am never in a position to make a similar choice, this just points to the struggles many working parents face each day as they try to stay on their feet. It definitely isn't fair
    How is a McDonalds safer than a park?  I can see the argument of shelter, but not knowing anything about this particular park there may in fact be a roofed shelter of some sort and fully functioning rest rooms available. Those things are fairly common place at parks.

    Couldn't the McDonalds be less safe - how much farther is it? How many more strangers will she be encountering there vs a park? The people visiting a park are most likely parents/caregivers and children vs. a fast food restaurant which could have any range of people. A child playing at a park is going to be presumed to have an adult so perhaps less likely to be targeted for kidnapping/crime.  But these are all big assumptions and who knows if there's even a McDonalds anywhere reasonably close-by. Perhaps the nearest one is a mile away. Is that really preferable to across the street? 

    But all this distracts from the broader issue of why this was her (and so many parent's) best option for childcare.  It's easy for me to say "well put the kid in a boys/girls club" or whatever, but maybe she can't afford their summer camp program?  FWIW I googled the zip codes from where this happened, according to the B&G club website the closest one is ~5miles and their program is $350 for 9a-2p, although you can keep kid there longer (for more $). They are closed the week of July 4th - so there's a whole week that Mom would still be stuck even if she utilized this program. Does Mom have a car/way to get child to/from club and then herself to work? We don't know. Perhaps work is walking distance from home and those 5miles are not
    reasonable to walk.
    And what if she's working at two? They're not going to let the girl leave the summer program alone and mom can't just leave work to pick her up.

    And while I don't think a nine year old alone for a long shift is good... Soemthing inside me rebels at the thought of a child spending her summer sitting in mcdonalds with a book or computer while her mom works. That seems far sadder than running around at a park. Closer to her mom, yes. But much sadder.


    image image
  • I think I need more details before I form a complete opinion. How long was the little girl there? How long was her mom's shift? Was she checking in periodically? Was the park visible to her mom's work? Did the mom even try to find alternate care? 

    However, my first instinct was "holy hell, that's kind of scary." I keep running through the "what if" scenarios in my mind. It also makes me sad to think of a little girl playing by herself. 

    I absolutely think an arrest was overkill. 

    I also think the person who called the cops was doing what she felt was right, and deserves no flames - something about a 9 year old being alone in a park raised alarm bells, and she followed her gut. If it were me, I might have walked the girl back to the mom's work instead of calling the cops, but the woman did what she felt she had to do.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    image




  • notreal2notreal2 member
    edited July 2014
     
    But these are all big assumptions and who knows if there's even a McDonalds anywhere reasonably close-by. Perhaps the nearest one is a mile away. Is that really preferable to across the street? 


    The mother worked at McDonalds.


    But as for my opinion, arresting, nope, shouldn't have happened. 


    Parenting has raised the idea that this is at least partially a class or race issue as this was a predominately white and upper middle class neighborhood and the girl and her mother are neither.  Just to introduce that element into the discussion.


     

     

     

     

  • notreal2 said:
     
    But these are all big assumptions and who knows if there's even a McDonalds anywhere reasonably close-by. Perhaps the nearest one is a mile away. Is that really preferable to across the street? 


    The mother worked at McDonalds.


    But as for my opinion, arresting, nope, shouldn't have happened. 

    Totally missed reading that the first time :\"> Just ignore all my ramblings lol.

    I do have to say, I agree with @Codypup that it seems sad to have the kid stuck at McDs all day instead of running around at the park even though it probably was a safer option.

    Still think it's ridiculous to arrest her though. That does absolutely nothing to improve the situation for the child, or her mother.


    imageimage
  • Meghan14Meghan14 member
    edited July 2014
    I saw this a few days ago and knew it would be posted here.  Leaving a child this age alone is not the choice I would make, but then I'm not working for min. wage at McDonald's with few other options available.   9 seems young, but it's not my kid and I know by 11 we were telling my parents we were going to ride bikes and were gone for several hours.  I think what worries me most is that she was alone. I think I'd feel better about this if there had been 2 kids so someone to go get help in the event of an injury.
    The mother who called the police was right to do so, but  arrest seems like overkill.  It seems like having this mother meet with a social worker to discuss other options would have been a more productive solution.

    Edit because I word vomited to organize ideas and then LO woke up before I could clean it up a bit.

    F'14 October Siggy Challenge: Animals in Costumes
    image

    image
  • breadpuddingbreadpudding member
    edited July 2014
    I don't think what she did was right at all. There are state funded programs that can pay for your child care if you are working. Leaving that girl at the park was irresponsible, and it could have ended badly. I do not believe that leaving this young girl alone at a park was this mother's only option. That being said, I do have sympathy for her for being in such a tough situation, yes. But the danger she put her child in is inexcusable.

    ETA I think I just flagged my own post on accident. Mobile bumping is hard.
  • breadpuddingbreadpudding member
    edited July 2014


    megash113 said:

    I actually agree with her being arrested. Leaving a nine year old at a park for hours everyday (you know it didn't just happen the one time) is not safe. At all. Predators would kill for that scenario.

    I think it was irresponsible parenting that could have resulted in tragedy. I'm glad something was done.

    FWIW - only around 100 children per year are kidnapped by strangers. And only 10-25% of sexual abuse cases are by strangers. I don't say that to minimize those very real tragedies, but to point out "Stranger Danger" is actually not what we should worry so much about. Sadly most kidnappings and sexual abuse is by known perpetrators so custody disputes resulting in kidnapping or family sexual assault, etc.  Unfortunately the dangers to our children are often at home, at school/youth groups, etc. and not the random man at the park.


    ---------------------------------

    I actually have to second this. Repeated sexual abuse is something that hits so very close to home for me, and each and every person I know who has been struck with this tragedy, has been abused by a trusted family member/family friend. That does not mean that strangers pose any less of a threat, it's just shedding light on the fact that it is sometimes a person you trust.

    In any case, leaving the girl alone was unsafe and irresponsible for many reasons, regardless of the statistics listed above.
  • ras26ras26 member
    I recognize that there is probably a lot of misinformation out there, but I read that the girl was on her third day at the park, and the mom's work was 1.5 miles away.  https://www.businessinsider.com/debra-harrell-arrested-for-allegedly-letting-daughter-play-alone-at-park-2014-7

    While I do not think that it was an ideal situation, I think the mom was trying to do the best she could with the resources she had available.  I don't blame the parent for calling the cops, but I do not think she should have been arrested.  Taking the child from her mother, putting the mother in jail, and the child in custody cannot be the best scenario either.  Leaving the child at the park is not a choice that I would necessarily make, but I think the "what-if" scenarios are kind of overblown.  There aren't random child-abductors lurking at every park. 

    That being said, even though the girl had a cell phone, I do feel that a park 1.5 miles away is kind of far (assuming no car) in the event of an emergency.  I am not sure I would be comfortable having a 9-year-old that far away alone. 
    IMG_2304IMG_3206
    Baby Girl #2 is on her way!
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
  • tri4fun said:

    I recognize that there is probably a lot of misinformation out there, but I read that the girl was on her third day at the park, and the mom's work was 1.5 miles away.  https://www.businessinsider.com/debra-harrell-arrested-for-allegedly-letting-daughter-play-alone-at-park-2014-7

    While I do not think that it was an ideal situation, I think the mom was trying to do the best she could with the resources she had available.  I don't blame the parent for calling the cops, but I do not think she should have been arrested.  Taking the child from her mother, putting the mother in jail, and the child in custody cannot be the best scenario either.  Leaving the child at the park is not a choice that I would necessarily make, but I think the "what-if" scenarios are kind of overblown.  There aren't random child-abductors lurking at every park. 

    That being said, even though the girl had a cell phone, I do feel that a park 1.5 miles away is kind of far (assuming no car) in the event of an emergency.  I am not sure I would be comfortable having a 9-year-old that far away alone. 


    If you look at maps, the roads would be a mile and a half. Cutting through the park, which backs up to the building her mom works in, means it's a lot shorter.



    image image
  • As far as the child care goes, how it works here is that you get a certain amount of money, and you can take that money anywhere you'd like to pay for child are. It can be used to pay a family member, friend, in-home daycare, or even baby utopia. There are no set locations where you have to take your child like there would be for housing. Waiting lists aren't long and there's always emergency funding for situations like this. I'm not saying that the circumstances are the same for her area, I'm just basing this off of what I've been told for my location.

    Arresting her was not the right choice, but I strongly agree that some sort of other plan should have been put into place.

    I do see how this situation was a hard one for the mother. She needed to work to provide for her child by working, yes. But leaving the child at a park unattended was crossing the line. I'd even be willing to venture as far as to say that she could have talked to her manager about her situation, and had her daughter go to work with her temporarily. My mother did that with my two brothers and I when she had to work and my dad was deployed. Is that an option everywhere? No. But it would have been worth a try to sit her daughter at a table with some coloring books, puzzles, etc. so Mom could work and still keep an eye on her daughter. That might be a little far fetched, yes. But I'm just not convinced that leaving her daughter alone was the only option she had.
  • JA82406 said:
    As far as the child care goes, how it works here is that you get a certain amount of money, and you can take that money anywhere you'd like to pay for child are. It can be used to pay a family member, friend, in-home daycare, or even baby utopia. There are no set locations where you have to take your child like there would be for housing. Waiting lists aren't long and there's always emergency funding for situations like this. I'm not saying that the circumstances are the same for her area, I'm just basing this off of what I've been told for my location. Arresting her was not the right choice, but I strongly agree that some sort of other plan should have been put into place. I do see how this situation was a hard one for the mother. She needed to work to provide for her child by working, yes. But leaving the child at a park unattended was crossing the line. I'd even be willing to venture as far as to say that she could have talked to her manager about her situation, and had her daughter go to work with her temporarily. My mother did that with my two brothers and I when she had to work and my dad was deployed. Is that an option everywhere? No. But it would have been worth a try to sit her daughter at a table with some coloring books, puzzles, etc. so Mom could work and still keep an eye on her daughter. That might be a little far fetched, yes. But I'm just not convinced that leaving her daughter alone was the only option she had.
    If I read the article correctly this is what she had been doing up until the 2 or 3 days the girl asked to go to the park.  Not saying this makes her decision any better or worse, just that this is something the mother had done.

    F'14 October Siggy Challenge: Animals in Costumes
    image

    image
  • breadpuddingbreadpudding member
    edited July 2014
    Meghan14 said:


    JA82406 said:

    As far as the child care goes, how it works here is that you get a certain amount of money, and you can take that money anywhere you'd like to pay for child are. It can be used to pay a family member, friend, in-home daycare, or even baby utopia. There are no set locations where you have to take your child like there would be for housing. Waiting lists aren't long and there's always emergency funding for situations like this. I'm not saying that the circumstances are the same for her area, I'm just basing this off of what I've been told for my location.

    Arresting her was not the right choice, but I strongly agree that some sort of other plan should have been put into place.

    I do see how this situation was a hard one for the mother. She needed to work to provide for her child by working, yes. But leaving the child at a park unattended was crossing the line. I'd even be willing to venture as far as to say that she could have talked to her manager about her situation, and had her daughter go to work with her temporarily. My mother did that with my two brothers and I when she had to work and my dad was deployed. Is that an option everywhere? No. But it would have been worth a try to sit her daughter at a table with some coloring books, puzzles, etc. so Mom could work and still keep an eye on her daughter. That might be a little far fetched, yes. But I'm just not convinced that leaving her daughter alone was the only option she had.

    If I read the article correctly this is what she had been doing up until the 2 or 3 days the girl asked to go to the park.  Not saying this makes her decision any better or worse, just that this is something the mother had done.

    ----------------------
    I didn't see that in the original article I read yesterday. Thank you for pointing that out. I'll quietly put my foot in my mouth now as far as that goes. ;)

    But now it brings me to this... Just because her daughter *wanted* to do something, doesn't mean letting her do it was the responsible thing to do.


    ETA line
  • car seat said:

    I feel sick at the idea of feeling that I really didn't have a safe place for my kids to spend the day. I'm just really sad for this family.

    You said what I'm feeling so simply and so well.

    I can't imagine being in this position.


    image image
  • Obviously I would need to know a bit more info before I say this with 100% confidence (how far away was the mom's work really? how long was she there? did she have access to water, snacks, the bathroom etc), but I think this was a crazy overreaction. 

    Law enforcement is walking a very slippery slope here. Are you going to start arresting crazy parents who put insane pressure on their kids to get into the best possible college, because if done in a REALLY CRAZY way this could have lasting very negative effects on the child? What about parents who just excuse every kind of behavior their child ever does and never teaches them to take any responsibility? lasting effects again! Do they plan to arrest all of these parents? This kind of crap is totally accepted in our society today and giving kids more independence really is not. 

    Would I leave my 9 year old in the park all day? Probably not. But I'll never be in that situation because I have a husband, a good job (so I can afford childcare), family that lives nearby etc. On the other hand, I really would like my son to be able to do things independently when he is 9, maybe a bike ride or walk to the candy store like I did when I was 9 without anyone thinking twice. 



    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    image
  • Even though it irritates me when moms AT the playground aren't watching their kids especially if they push around or pick on little ones, etc, I have a lot of sympathy for someone if they had no other choice than to leave their child alone so they could work. But I don't know what was happening at that playground when the police were called.

    Is anyone a mandatory reporter? If so would the girl alone at the playground force you to make a call?


    My Blog (that is not really about eating in the shower)
  • psk said:




    RondackHiker said:
    For everyone saying that there are free or low cost programs, have you ever looked into those?

    Because I have, both for myself and others and every time I have the waiting lists were months long. Some had VERY limited hours.

    It's not as simple as "hey! I need you guys to watch my kid for the day."
    This bears repeating.

    Truly folks, if it were really THAT easy I don't think cases like this would be so common. Most people aren't jerks neglecting their kids. Yes, those things happen. But it doesn't sound like that's what is going on here.

    And seriously, $350 for the summer program at the BGC 9-2 (which isn't even 8hrs) is just over 48hrs of work at minimum wage. That is potentially over a weeks pay for her, if she's even on FT hours. I worked FF, most "FT" employees are scheduled ~30hrs a week or less. That is a big financial burden for care that may not even cover what she needs nevermind knowing whether there's space for her kid or if it's decent care.

    It's easier to talk about how irresponsible she is and whether jail time is just. It's a lot harder to recognize the systemic problems the US has in terms of affordable, accessible, quality childcare.

    Just curious where the # and hours came from? I know someone running programs for local chapters and the hours are much longer and it is a $20 "membership". The dues are waived if it is not financially feasible, however, they find that charging a nominal amount encourages people to actually take advantage of the services more.

    She looked it up. Someone suggest big brothers and big sisters and she looked up the cost and hours.

    I'd wonder how long the waiting list is for the program you mentioned. In many (but not all) areas, those programs fill FAST.


    image image
  • psk said:

    @RondackHiker I suggested it as an option. My DH and I are involved with the local organization that oversees a number of chapters, and my former colleague manages/coordinates the chapters and their funding. At least where I live, they are all open enrollment and no wait lists. I called my colleague there to confirm, just because I wanted to make sure I wasn't making up facts. She said a wait list goes against their principle of being there when families and children are in need. I suppose that can depend on the individual chapter though, but, again, that goes against everything I have learned about the organization.

    Can I ask what organization this is and where they get their funding?

    Not trying to be snarky, but "going against the organization" or not, usually funding for space and workers and supplies eventually runs out and you end up with the waiting list.


    image image
  • It seems like parental rights get eroded more and more, or at least when it comes to certain things. A nine year old in a crowded park is almost definitely not going to get kidnapped or abused by a stranger. Statistically there are thousands of more dangerous things that parents don't get arrested for.

    It's one thing to say "I don't think that was a great parenting decision." That's your opinion. It's quite another to say the police should step in and seriously screw up this family's life.
    photo c951a5b354e3a3c8ca0da37e31c6125f.jpg
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"