February 2014 Moms

In home daycare vs. care in our home and $ question

Nikkijo1022Nikkijo1022 member
edited July 2014 in February 2014 Moms
Hi :)
We had originally planned to send LO to an in home setting where they charge $800/month. It's a nice place- 2 adults there and 7-8 other kids. LO would be youngest by just a few months.
DH works a 6 on 3 off rotation and so we don't need full time care (average 20 hours a week of care) but because the days aren't consistent we can't find any in home facility that will allow us to pay for a part time spot.
Enter care.com! I put an add up for someone to come to us and welcome to bring their child. I was a little skeptical but ended up finding someone amazing who has a LO who will be 5 months older than mine.
On the site there is a payment calculator where you can enter your zip code etc. And get the "going rate" for 20 hours a week in our are is give or take $800 month. Just to give you an idea of the costs. I know it can vary in each region.
So my questions.... How much less do you think we could/should pay (or not) if someone is bringing their own child and essentially getting free childcare? I would just assume if I brought my son I would get paid less than I did when I was nannying right our of college.
Am I crazy for not taking the spot at the in home? We would pay for the full week and have care anytime vs only when DH is working with the nanny. Spots in a daycare Are hard to come by in my town. (No large childcare center) but I can't help but love the idea of LO in his own home and obviously the convenience of him just being here so no drop offs/ pick ups and getting him packed up and ready in the AM. And possibly saving some money.
Thoughts... Experience? Thanks for reading!!
image
February Moms August Siggy Challege- Cats in Space- M-M-M-M-Meowwww


Re: In home daycare vs. care in our home and $ question

  • I don't have the answers to many if your questions, but child care isn't something you want to bargain shop for.

    Is the in-home licensed? Because that would be important to me.
    F14 January Siggy Challenge: Gym/Fitness Fails
    image
       Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image
  • Loading the player...
  • I think for little kids the benefit to being in the home is great. Also not having to pack anything is a huge bonus. The real benefit to sending LO to a daycare is even if you don't NEED care because your DH is off that day you could still send him and your DH (or you!!) could get things done without baby interrupting that. In the end I think they are both good choices, so whatever you feel most comfortable with!
    DD1 - Evelyn Riley - 9/30/11
    DD2 - Charlotte Avery - 1/27/14




  • We pay more for our two kids to be in an in-home than we would to have someone come to our home.  I really like the interaction they get with other kids.

    BFP #1 9/2010 (lost our baby at 21 weeks) BFP #2 8/2011 (ectopic pregnancy) BFP #3 10/2011 (chemical pregnancy) BFP #4 12/2011 (Abigail born 8/15/12) BFP #5 5/2013 (Griffin born 1/23/14 with heart defects, now repaired!)

      photo 72ec2e97-1e39-4650-8caa-7a40c9ac500b.jpg imagephoto 929c6b58-8824-44a8-a8a6-68330306a3a9.jpg
  • Here are my opinions - she's not getting free childcare, she's caring for her own child and yours. Free childcare would be her watching your kid and someone else watching hers for free. I'd say it's more of a perk than free childcare. I'd ask her what her pay range is and decide if you can afford that.  We found the payrange on care.com to be pretty consistent with what nanny/babysitters in our area were asking.

    We had a nanny for a brief time, and I loved not having to worry about drop off and pick up. The downside is if nanny is sick (or her LO) you are stuck with no childcare. If nanny is late, you're late. So finding someone who is reliable is very important.

    I will say as LO got older (by 18m-2yr) his need to get out and interact with other kids outweighed the convenience of being at home. One of the reasons we switched to group care at a center.  But if she's bringing along a child that may not be as problematic. The other downside of care in your home is that usually means the kids can be get bored - same toys, etc. Again this is largely thinking long term. Babies are a lot easier to entertain since everything is brand new.

    There are going to be pros/cons to both options. I don't think you're crazy for not going with daycare though. But you'll want to pay a nanny well if she's really a great nanny she'll be worth it.


    imageimage
  • One thought - if I had a nanny I would purposely ask them to take my LO out to toddler groups so that they got interaction with other children . I personally think this is the best if both worlds as they get more 1:1 attention as well! both options sound good though!

    I agree with previous posters that you should not pay less because she is bringing her own kid.
  • Thank you for your opinions.
    I think what I said came across wrong!
    What I meant was- (IMO) the going rate for a "nanny" is based on the fact that your child will get 1 on 1 care. When I nannied I was with the child all day, did laundry for the child, loaded/unloaded dishwasher, swept and vaccumed etc. When he was sleeping. Took him to play groups and his activitys (little tumblers class) and took him to his weekly speech appt. I think the pay was higher bc I was doing more than just watching him, using my own gas etc.
    I think having someone come to our home and bring their child is a little different. Yes it will be harder with 2 little ones because their care is split 2 ways. Just like the in home family facility doesn't charge $10/hour like a nanny would because their care is split between many kids.
    As a first time mom with major anxiety as it is, I'm very very picky and definitely don't want to "bargain shop" for care. I haven't left LO for a night yet! I honestly just didn't know if those that bring their child would make the same as someone who doesn't as the only experience I have is nannying and what my parents paid back in the 1980's lol.
    Thank you!
    image
    February Moms August Siggy Challege- Cats in Space- M-M-M-M-Meowwww


  • One thought - if I had a nanny I would purposely ask them to take my LO out to toddler groups so that they got interaction with other children . I personally think this is the best if both worlds as they get more 1:1 attention as well! both options sound good though! I agree with previous posters that you should not pay less because she is bringing her own kid.
    I've thought about this, but then you need to trust someone you don't know well to drive your kids around, which is a high hurdle in my opinion. 
    BFP #1 9/2010 (lost our baby at 21 weeks) BFP #2 8/2011 (ectopic pregnancy) BFP #3 10/2011 (chemical pregnancy) BFP #4 12/2011 (Abigail born 8/15/12) BFP #5 5/2013 (Griffin born 1/23/14 with heart defects, now repaired!)

      photo 72ec2e97-1e39-4650-8caa-7a40c9ac500b.jpg imagephoto 929c6b58-8824-44a8-a8a6-68330306a3a9.jpg
  • edited July 2014
    I guess it does make sense to me to pay less if she's bringing her child along, although I wouldn't call it "free childcare". By being able to have her child at work with her she is saving whatever she would have paid for her own childcare during those hours. It could be considered part of a compensation package.

    That said, I *used* to complain alot about the cost of daycare pre-baby, but after spending 10 weeks home taking care of my little fussbucket I think daycare should charge twice as much! They don't get paid enough to deal with that!
  • Nikkijo1022Nikkijo1022 member
    edited July 2014
    lowea1 said:

    We found someone on care.com as well. SAHM mom of 2 who was looking for a way to make enough extra money to stay home with them.

    She watches our DS, one other toddler, and her 2 kids. We pay her the "going rate." There's no way she should be penalized for having her kids there; it's part of her 1:4 ratio!

    A HUGE plus for us is that she only charges on when DS is there. We work out a schedule 2 weeks in advance and pay accordingly.

    FFFC/UO: She's not licensed, but we did get a background check. My thinking on the licensing was that I wouldn't require a "date night" sitter or nanny to be licensed, and I just felt more comfortable with her the any others we interviewed (including traditional daycare.) I should add that we plan on putting DS in traditional DC around 2-3 before preschool, when I will want a more structured curriculum and environment for him.

    From your post it sounds like you take your little one there (along with one other and her kids) So is the "going rate" you pay that of an in home facility or a babysitter that would come to your home? Is there a difference in your area?
    I ask because that's kind of where my post is coming from.
    In our area the going rate (for one child) bringing him somewhere would cost us around $5/hour ($40/day) that's significantly less than a nanny but they also don't offer part time care. Ie: you pay when LO isn't there.
    If someone came to us as a nanny or nightly babysitter I would pay them $10/hour. My question is because the person is coming to me but bringing her child I see it as kind of in between a nanny and in home facility. Maybe I'm wrong in thinking this?
    image
    February Moms August Siggy Challege- Cats in Space- M-M-M-M-Meowwww


This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"