So we just got the list of grades about our remaining blasts, and we do have some of good quality, so we're very happy. But I've realized that I'm a bit confused, so I thought I'd check the collective wisdom on this forum. I'd love to hear anything that you know about all this.
1. Which of these is better: 6BB or 5AA? Meaning, what is the general principle of which of these three grades means the most? Does the further stage of development mean more than the ABC grade? Or are those more important? Similarly, does anyone know if there's a preference between 5AB or 5BA?
2. What are the chances for an embryo with something like a 5BC grade? Low? Still pretty good? Unknown?
3. Does the speed of embryo development matter? So we had some that made it to the blast stage on day 5 and others that took until day 6. The doctor told me it doesn't matter, but I've heard other people say here that it does. What have you ladies heard?
Any wisdom you ladies can share would be great. I've tried googling this, but the websites don't say all that much.
Thanks!
**********************siggy/ticker warning*************************Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.

Stage 1 endo removed June 2013.
IVF #1 Oct/Nov 2013: Long Lupron with Gonal-F. 7R, 7M, 7F. 2 txfer@3d. Nothing frozen. => M/C @ 8 wks.

Selected RPL panel all normal. Very hyper and brittle response to stims.
IVF #2 (antagonist protocol) Feb 2014 => Converted to IUI (Perfect conditions). BFN.
IVF #2.1 w/ new RE June 2014: Antagonist protocol. 33R, 31M, 30F, 19 blasts to test!!! I made it through without crashing!!

Hats off to Dr. Fancypants!! ET of one 5AB blast. BFN.
13 10 CCS'ed snowflakes!
FET #1 PUPO as of 7/29 Betas: 8/7@24, 8/9@97, 8/11@334 (etc.) Two sacs on 8/15, one seen on 8/18 after a bleed. U/s 8/25 (6+3) "perfect": 5.9 mm + HB@120bpm! U/s 9/4 (7+6): 15.9 mm + HB@172 bpm! Please, PLEASE stick this time!!!!
Re: Blast grading - what does it really mean? **PAIF & SAIF welcome!
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
TTC Since 12/2008; DH: 32, Azoospermia me: 33, DX during IVF #4: Low AMH (Normal FSH) / SER due
to IVF Meds (causing failure to fertilize) Recent DX: Hashimoto's, Lupus Anticoagulant, White Blood Cell Disorder
High ANA, ATA, & APA, PAI-1 Heterozygous= blood clotting disorder; connective tissue disorder
IVF w/ ICSI #1 2/2011 IVF w/ ICSI #2 5/2011 IVF w/ ICSI #3 12/2012 *New RE* IVF w/ ICSI #4 5/2013
IVF w/ ICSI #5 8/2013 (Natural Cycle- No drugs)- One follicle->one blast. CCS normal. FET 9/10- 6BB blast. m/c @ 5w
IUI #1 12/23- BFN IUI #2 Cancelled (ovulated during AF) Prep:CoQ10 (300 mg); DHEA (25 mg); Melatonin (3 mg), Folgard 2.2, Metformin 500 2x, Levothyroxine 50mcg, Aspirin 81mg w/ calcium, B12, Vit. D 4000 & Prenate Elite Daily; Cabergoline 1/2 pill 2x week- Cycling: Estrace Priming; Prednisone 10mg, Lovenox 40mg 2x, Femera & Menopur
IUI #2.1 6/30 & 7/1. 1st Beta: 90 (7/15); 2nd Beta: 226 (7/17); 3rd Beta: 766 EDD: 3/23/2015
https://www.vitrolife.com/en/Fertility/Together/Studies_Research/New-thesis-shows-trophectoderm-cells-to-be-stronger-predictor-for-live-birth-than-inner-cell-mass/
That page also references this study, which clearly contains the probabilities of success for 1 v 2 blasts that many of us have heard.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10856474
I'm going to get the full text of that if anyone wants to read it.
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
2. When we did our FET we transferred a BA and a CB. The BA was hatching at the time of transfer. We did have success with both embryos. One split into identical twins, but the twins stopped developing at about 6 weeks. I have no idea if the baby i'm carrying now is the better or poorer embryo.
3. My clinic didn't address the speed of the embryo development. Like pp have mentioned I think that it could make a difference in the fresh transfer and the embryo could miss the implantation window. Both of the embryos we put back were day 6 embryos. We have 4 day 5 embryos frozen. I never found out why they chose the two they did to put back. I suspect it was either because 1) the one embryo was hatching or 2) we were putting back 2 and those two were frozen together as they didn't think the CB embryo would survive the vitrification process in its own pipet, so it was just easier to take those two.
---- Siggy warning ------
Me 34 y/o DH 35 y/o
IVF#1 (ICSI)-- April 2014-- MDL with BCP, 5R, 4 ICSID, 3dt with three embryos, 1 six-day freeze (2BA grade)-- BFN
IVF#2.1 (ICSI)-- August 2014: MDL without BCP-- cancelled
Natural IUI on 11/8 -- BFN
IVF#2.2 (ICSI)--Nov/Dec 2014: MDL without BCP, 5R, 1 ICSID, frozen on day 6 (grade 2BB)
FET #1: transferred two 5 (or 6?)day embryos on January 27. Beta #1 (2/4): 158, Beta #2 (2/6): 391 Beta #3(2/9): 1187 BFP!
First u/s at 5w1d showed one gestational sac and yolk sac. Second u/s at 6w showed heartbeat at 102. Third u/s at 7w heart rate 145. EDD 10/15/2015
---- Siggy warning ------
Me 34 y/o DH 35 y/o
IVF#1 (ICSI)-- April 2014-- MDL with BCP, 5R, 4 ICSID, 3dt with three embryos, 1 six-day freeze (2BA grade)-- BFN
IVF#2.1 (ICSI)-- August 2014: MDL without BCP-- cancelled
Natural IUI on 11/8 -- BFN
IVF#2.2 (ICSI)--Nov/Dec 2014: MDL without BCP, 5R, 1 ICSID, frozen on day 6 (grade 2BB)
FET #1: transferred two 5 (or 6?)day embryos on January 27. Beta #1 (2/4): 158, Beta #2 (2/6): 391 Beta #3(2/9): 1187 BFP!
First u/s at 5w1d showed one gestational sac and yolk sac. Second u/s at 6w showed heartbeat at 102. Third u/s at 7w heart rate 145. EDD 10/15/2015