Secondary IF

3% morphology- question

Is this considered bad? Normal? I am so confused, should we still continue to try naturally? is it even going to happen??
image

Re: 3% morphology- question

  • We are dealing with low morph- Kruger was 3.5%. We've been TTC # 2 for almost 4 years with no other issues. It depends oboe a lot of factors. If your DH has a super high count and top notch motility, and you have zero fertility problems, then I would imagine the morphology wouldn't be such a problem. Do you have other stats?
  • Loading the player...
  • I think I need to get those.....:) just asked!
    image
  • The Motility  59 and Total Mobile 112 million motile sperm.
    image
  • The numbers don't sound bad- I mean, the morph could be better, but it seems like you have count on your side.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"