My son has always been a good sleeper and continues to be. He typically sleeps 9.5 to 10 hours per night every night. We get him to go to sleep by holding him in our arms and playing him lullaby music. Once he closes his eyes, we hold him for about 5 minutes to make sure he is getting into a deeper sleep then we slip him into his crib. It has always worked out for him.
But today we had his 9-month checkup, and we told the doctor this is how we get him to sleep. She said this is bad because he's not falling to sleep on his own. She suggested that we stick him into the crib and let him cry it out. I do not feel comfortable with doing this and would like to stick to our routine that's working.
Can anyone tell me what kinds of problems we might run into longer term if we keep up with out current sleep routine? I guess I just don't understand why someone would say that's so bad. What issues might we be in for if we keep doing this?? Any advice would be much appreciated. I just can't bring myself listen to my sweet boy cry it out.
Re: Is Holding My Baby to Sleep Really a Bad Thing?
If he isn't capable of falling back to sleep on his own, then I would think you might want to change it. My DD is almost 3 and either my DH or myself has put her to sleep every night except when I was in the hospital having our twins. We are ok with that. So it really depends on how much you want him to depend on you.
With DD we did the same as you. But with our twins I needed them to learn to lay down in their cribs & drift off on their own. We are trying a modified Ferber cry it out and have seen a lot of improvement in less than 2 weeks.
That said, I think babies often cry in their sleep or as part of their sleep cycles and parents often rush in to comfort them and end up waking them up more in the process. I sometimes wonder if "cry it out" was more intended to keep parents from waking a sleep-crying baby. But that would be more middle of the night than bedtime.
I also suspect that "teaching them to fall asleep on their own so if they wake in the middle of the night, they can get themselves back to sleep" is more a matter of convenience for parents who neither want to wake up in the middle of the night nor want to spend an extended time period putting their children to bed. I just don't think letting a child cry him/herself to sleep is "teaching them to fall asleep on their own".
But maybe that's just me.
I can't do CIO. Like PP, I don't think it teaches them to self-soothe and even if it did, I don't want him to have to devote any emotional or mental energy towards that goal at this age. I also don't feel CIO is a good idea for preverbal infants. Once your baby us a little older you can explain your routine and that you're going to lie them down to sleep, you will hug your bear, I will leave the room, etc.
If you're happy with what you're doing I wouldn't change it. We FF, but I planned on BF and was mentally prepared to have a baby that didn't STTN until he was at least a year old. Most nights he does STTN, but needs our help falling asleep initially. I would love it if I could just plop him in his crib and he would drift off on his own, but DH and I are not willing to do CIO to accomplish that.
Rylan 1/27/2011, 2:42 pm, 5lbs 12oz, 18.5 inches long
Ayla 10/02/2013, 10:14 am, 6lbs 14oz, 19.25 inches long
Missed Miscarriage 6w3d 3/02/2010
I'll hold you in my heart until I hold you in heaven.