DS is named after MIL's dad because DH thought it would mean so much to her. DH never met his grandpa, so it was all for MIL. We just found out yesterday that MIL had stroke #5 and is now immobile, so we aren't sure how much longer she will be around.
I have been toying with baby names that would honor her, but I wonder if it's too much? That would make two babies named for her side of the family and none for mine. For a girl it wouldn't be too bad because the middle name would be after my mom. The only boy name on my side of the family is passed from father to son (my brother is a III, so IV is reserved for his future kid).
MIL is not very lucid and has a hard time forming new memories- I don't even think she would notice if we did name the baby after her.
So what do you think? Would you name two of your children for the same person? Do you think feelings would be hurt if baby was named after one side of the family and not the other?
Re: Naming baby for MIL- again?
I think its a super personal decision and probably everyone has a different nuance to what they would do. For me though, I would not feel comfortable having a one-sided naming and even if no one said anything it would feel odd as time went on. If I had a first name that went to my side, then I would consider the MIL for the middle name although even that seems a bit much for me personally. Can you do your mom as the first? I agree that the naming will be more for you guys than her (sadly) so it seems like it is more about what you and your hubby are comfortable doing.
Native NYC-ers living in Switzerland - First time parents - 36 + 37
TTC: 8 Months / BFP: 2/8/2014 / EDD: 10/20/2014
Sorry to hear about your MIL. I think this is your child and you can name it in honor of whomever you choose, especially if you like the name. I think it is a sweet thing to do no matter if MIL realizes it and that this baby will have that connection.
I am naming my lo after DH's dad (who passed 10 years ago) so it will have no connection to any of my family's names however my brother is the 5th and the name needs to stop! I could see my dad's face when I said this baby was essentially not going to have a name associated with his but he is still super happy about the baby regardless of the name.
I wouldn't think twice about naming two kids for the same person or for the same side of the family if that person or those people were important to DH and I and were people that we wanted to honor, or whose memories we wanted to honor. We've toyed with the idea of naming this baby for my Nana's father, but his name was Axel, and we only like it with the Swedish pronunciation (ox-el, instead of axe-l, so NOT like Axl Rose), and it would bug me to be correcting people all the time. It's still a possibility for a middle name, though.
I agree with pp that it is a personal decision about who you want to honor. There isn't really a tradition of it on my side of the family but there is on DH's so we don't have any issue there.
I hope things work out but with larger issues regarding MIL health and care, approaching name decisions with DH might be easier later on in the pregnancy when things are less fresh.