So I FINALLY had my new RE appt (R.MA in NY) yesterday, and I walked away from it unsure if I want to cycle with them or not. The biggest problem is that he's pretty sure he wants me to use the same protocol that my local RE tried last time, which I thought was a disaster. Trying to be brief, I haven't managed to sustain an E2 rise except for the cycle that included Lupron, and he wants to do another antagonist cycle. Major caveat: he is planning on plugging all of my info into their computer algorithm to see which protocol would be best, but he was pretty certain this would be the answer. If he comes back with a different protocol, I'll probably go ahead, but he made that seem very unlikely, even though I told him I was extremely nervous about trying that protocol again.
The second thing that really grated was his personality. For example, he went on a rather long self-congratulatory speech about how he had fine-tuned the lab with lots of technology--things that most people wouldn't have thought would matter, but that he believes result in an extra pregnancy or two out of one hundred patients. BUT, when I asked about things I could do--alcohol, diet, supplements, acupuncture, exercise, etc.--he was completely dismissive and almost derisive on the topic. I guess it's good that he said I could do whatever I wanted to in that regard, but it took a while for me to realize how obnoxious it seemed to me that he thought ONLY HE (and he spoke about the clinic in the first person singular, not acknowledging that it's a team effort) had the God-like power to affect outcomes, and NOTHING a mere patient could do would have the slightest effect on outcomes. And there's research to show this isn't true! If a different air filter is valuable because it can add 1-2% to success rates, why not CoQ10 or acupuncture?????
I also got some fun new diagnoses out of the meeting--slightly arcuate uterus, BOTH tubes are messed up, and, as I posted
elsewhere, he really thinks I should be treated as a PCOS patient and put on metformin. (I have always had normal periods with ovulation, I have none of the physical phenotypical characteristics, I have no insulin resistance, no elevated androgens, etc.) He did reassure me that the endometriosis shouldn't matter one bit, which was nice.
I went back and compared the two clinic success rates (of course, there are other clinic options, but I'm setting those aside for the moment). This new one is definitely better, but mine really isn't too bad for a small clinic (if you assume 2012 was an off year for those 35-37).

Other considerations: The clinic is far away and it would be very expensive and inconvenient to cycle there. I know I'm a weirdo, but I also hate NYC--it's so crowded and noisy and the air feels bad. I like my trees and space, TYVM.
Part of me is tempted to take all this information to my original RE and see what he has to say about it. That seems rude, but the major reason I decided to switch was his choice of protocol last time. Since FancyPants RE wants the same protocol, my regular RE is looking much better.
Sorry this is so long. Any advice?????
**********************siggy/ticker warning*************************Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.

Stage 1 endo removed June 2013.
IVF #1 Oct/Nov 2013: Long Lupron with Gonal-F. 7R, 7M, 7F. 2 txfer@3d. Nothing frozen. => M/C @ 8 wks.

Selected RPL panel all normal. Very hyper and brittle response to stims.
IVF #2 (antagonist protocol) Feb 2014 => Converted to IUI (Perfect conditions). BFN.
IVF #2.1 w/ new RE June 2014: Antagonist protocol. 33R, 31M, 30F, 19 blasts to test!!! I made it through without crashing!!

Hats off to Dr. Fancypants!! ET of one 5AB blast. BFN.
13 10 CCS'ed snowflakes!
FET #1 PUPO as of 7/29 Betas: 8/7@24, 8/9@97, 8/11@334 (etc.) Two sacs on 8/15, one seen on 8/18 after a bleed. U/s 8/25 (6+3) "perfect": 5.9 mm + HB@120bpm! U/s 9/4 (7+6): 15.9 mm + HB@172 bpm! Please, PLEASE stick this time!!!!
Re: Fancypants new RE fails to impress--what would you do? (v long)
FET #1 (7/2013) - 2 embryos - BFN
FET #2 (9/2013) - 2 emrbyos - BFN
New RE. Fresh Start
IVF #2 (2/2014) - 25 Retrieved, 19 Mature, 16 Fertilized, 9 blasts.
CGH Testing: 6 Normal
FET #3 (4/2014) -1 embryo - BFP! Beta#1: 35 Beta #2: 16
FET #4 (5/2014) -1 embryo - BFP! Beta#1: 321!!! Beta #2: 727.9! 6/5/2014 Heartbeat! 144bpm It's a girl! Due January!
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
You totally have me wondering if we saw the same RE??? My new RE is in NYC too and at first I got a weird vibe. I LOVED my RE in Long Island but he didn't think outside of the box and I wasn't getting pregnant even though I had no major issues. I went for a 2nd opinion in NYC and was very confused as to what to do. I will say that I left the consult not really sure if I should switch but I decided to go for it. When I started cycling with my new RE in NYC he was a lot different and I felt more comfortable. NYC is not very convenient for me either but I'm making it work. My first BETA came back positive at 59 so I am happy I switched even though I was hesitant. Not sure what tomorrow's BETA will show but this is the farthest I have ever gotten (see siggy for info). So in my case I say change was good.
Please tell me or PM me who the RE is! I bet its the same one!
DX: Unexplained
BETA #1 59 BETA #2 148 BETA #3 283 BETA #4 2,783! US at 6w2d shows 1 bean measuring right on track! HR 121. US at 8w3d measuring on track HR 177. Released form my RE. EDD 12/28
FET #1 (7/2013) - 2 embryos - BFN
FET #2 (9/2013) - 2 emrbyos - BFN
New RE. Fresh Start
IVF #2 (2/2014) - 25 Retrieved, 19 Mature, 16 Fertilized, 9 blasts.
CGH Testing: 6 Normal
FET #3 (4/2014) -1 embryo - BFP! Beta#1: 35 Beta #2: 16
FET #4 (5/2014) -1 embryo - BFP! Beta#1: 321!!! Beta #2: 727.9! 6/5/2014 Heartbeat! 144bpm It's a girl! Due January!
Edited image out because I accidentally included my location!
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
First off-I am sorry you have such a tough decision to make. I have been through many cycles myself and it has been a rough road. One thing I want to say is to go with your gut. If you don't want to do antagonist again then don't. My dx is DOR and I found that most RE's pushed me into an antagonist protocol. It seems to be one of the most popular protocols. I never did well on it. I had a pretty good response on the MDL protocol. Compared with the antagonist cycle- it was like night and day. I actually got pregnant that cycle but m/c'd.
I switched RE's after that cycle and my new RE insisted on going back to the antagonist. I knew in my gut that I shouldn't but I did anyway. I did not have a good cycle. My new RE does not like MDL so I couldn't try that again but I convinced them to let me try long lupron. They advised me that LLP is not optimal for DOR patients but since the protocol they suggested did not work, they were willing to give me a shot with sort of designing my own protocol. I did a lot better on the LLP. After some tweaks, I was finally able to come up with a variation of the LLP that worked for me. For the first time I began producing good quality embryos which I never had before. I have a separate egg maturation problem we have yet to solve so that's why despite retrieving an o-k amount of eggs, I never have many mature. Anyways, I say all this to say...go to a clinic where they will LISTEN to you and take your concerns/suggestions SERIOUSLY. My doctor is very smart, humble and a great listener. They has no problem admitting that their protocol did not work and were open to thinking outside of the box. My theories and research were not dismissed and I was so impressed and thankful that they allowed me to try my own protocol. Best of luck to you.
Me & DH (33), 3 Furbabies, TTC since October 2011
Day 3 #’s (Dec 2012) FSH 9, AMH .77, LH 2.4, E2 31, AFC 9
DX: Me-DOR + No Tubes, DH-Fine
Ectopic 2007; lost tube/2nd tube removed Dec 2011 (hydro)
April 2012=IVF#1- EPP Antag+ICSI, 2R,0F (BFN), Now dx’d with DOR.
June-July 2012=IVF#2- MDL+ICSI&AH, 8R,4M,3F (BFP 9dp3dt) Beta#1 at 11dp3dt=36, Beta#2 at 15dp3dt=156, Beta#3 at 19dp3dt=671, dx'd with SCH, no growth-m/c at 7wks/Lap Dec 2012 to remove small fibroid.
Feb 2013=IVF#3-MDL, 2/1=baseline, started 10 units mdl, AFC-7, 2/3 start gonal f, self cxld cycle b/c of low e2.
April 2013=IVF#3.5-(with new RE)AG/ANT Conv + ICSI. 4/10-4/23 bcp's, 4/20-4/27 lupron, 4/28-ganirelix until end of stimming, 5/2-600 gonal f, 5/4-add 1/2 vial menopur, 5/13-ER (9R,1M,1F), 5/17-ET, 1 beautiful 8 cell (please be my sticky baby!!!!) 5/28-BFFN.
Oct 2013=IVF#4-LLP+ICSI &AH, 10/14 (6R, 2M, 2F), 10/17-ET, 1 seven cell & a six cell, BFP at 9dp3dt, 1st beta=56, 2nd beta=52, CP.
Jan 2014=IVF #5-LLP, Cxld after 6 days of stims due to fast response and lead follicle.
March 2014=IVF 5.5-LLP, Lupron 3/10, BL 3/18, 11 days of stims, Trigger 3/29, ER 3/31. 7R, 2M, 2F. ET 4/3. Txfd one 5 cell & one 9 cell. BFP on hpt from 7dp3dt & on. Praise be to God. Beta #1 at 11dp3dt=106, #2 at 13dp3dt=239. First u/s 4/28, measuring on track & heartbeat seen. 5/5-2nd u/s, measuring on track with strong heartbeat. 5/12- 3rd u/s & released from RE. Grow baby grow, we love you! Baby G&T is a BOY! Born 12/2014 via c/s! 8lbs, 8oz & 21 inches.
*******Ticker Warning**********
"God's Delay is not God's Denial"
THIS!!!! I think when it comes down to it, I feel like I am choosing between a better lab that is the opposite of patient-centered care, and my local clinic where my doctor is very accommodating of what I want. I really don't know which of those is more important!
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
If you don't feel comfortable, don't go. I think you need to feel like a team with your RE and if you already have a bad vibe, don't do it. It's such a long process and if you don't like the new RE AND have a long distance to travel, you'll absolutely dread it.
We switched clinics to one with a higher success rate, but we loved the RE. This was two years ago and we travel 1 1/2 hours one way and I can't say that I minded since I loved the office so much.
Listen to your gut. It's always right. There are always other clinics if you weren't comfortable today!!
Edited to add: We also had a phone consult with CC.RM (another big wig office) We were not impressed. Fortunately, our office has higher success rates than them, we just wanted an outside opinion. However, I think we expect amazing things from these fancy clinics and often, it's just smoke and mirrors. They don't always have more to offer than regular, smaller offices.
ttc #2 since 2004 Me (35): Stage 3 Endo, DH (34): High DNA Frag
IVF/ICSI #2: April 2014: BFP!!!!!!
ET of 2 great quality embryos. + BFP on 9dp5dt. Beta #1 (10dp5dt): 257, Beta #2 (14dp5dt): 1561,
Beta #3 (21dp5d5): 8,172. Wow. It seems this is actually working. Shocked beyond belief.
1st u/s @6w5d: Baby A hb 124, Baby B hb 127 (Both measuring perfectly!)
Lost baby A. Praying that baby B stays healthy. Baby B hb 175 at 11 weeks
It's a GIRL!!!
My Blog
DX: Unexplained
BETA #1 59 BETA #2 148 BETA #3 283 BETA #4 2,783! US at 6w2d shows 1 bean measuring right on track! HR 121. US at 8w3d measuring on track HR 177. Released form my RE. EDD 12/28
I'm dragging my heels about looking into other clinics for a few reasons. One is that I'd like to get started with my next cycle (2-3 weeks from now). Another is that I couldn't find a clinic my insurance covered that had much better numbers than the one I just went to. Finally, I would have to pay for the consult out of pocket, which I'm reluctant to do. We're cash poor and insurance rich--my job has great insurance, but my OH is only nominally employed. The idea was that he would be almost a stay-at-home dad, but that hasn't worked out yet. Sigh.
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
I'm new to the board (not new to infertility) and just wanted to wish you luck. I know what a tough decision this can be. Good luck!
**********Warning SAIF mentioned************************
Me: anovulatory/DOR
DH: + antibodies
2011 IUI: #1: BFN
2011 IUI: #2: BFN
1/12 IVF #1: Lupron protocol resulting in 1 follicle --> converted to IUI = SAIF
2013 IUI #3: BFN
2013 IUI #4: BFP followed by M/C
4/14 IVF #2: FX
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
"Dr. X reviewed your records and would like to try the Antagonist protocol with a prep month on the birth control pill (see outline attached). We’re also going to keep you on a more consistent medication dosage instead of fluctuating it in order to prevent your estrogen from “crashing” again."
At least they're addressing my concerns here, so that's something. Also, does that really say I'll be on a solid month of BCP??????
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
2013: BFP #1 - M/C 3/13
2015: Dance break = got healthy
7/2016: IVF #5 = BFP!!!
FET #1 (7/2013) - 2 embryos - BFN
FET #2 (9/2013) - 2 emrbyos - BFN
New RE. Fresh Start
IVF #2 (2/2014) - 25 Retrieved, 19 Mature, 16 Fertilized, 9 blasts.
CGH Testing: 6 Normal
FET #3 (4/2014) -1 embryo - BFP! Beta#1: 35 Beta #2: 16
FET #4 (5/2014) -1 embryo - BFP! Beta#1: 321!!! Beta #2: 727.9! 6/5/2014 Heartbeat! 144bpm It's a girl! Due January!
Also, the email that she sent that I quoted above did two things. First, it showed me that he acknowledged my concerns about doing this protocol, and I appreciate that. Second, it suggested that the choice of the protocol wasn't the problem at the local clinic, but it was the fact that my meds were constantly fluctuating (VERY true!), which is bad, at least for someone as brittle as me. So that's another reason to be suspicious of my local clinic.
If I go there and have a bad experience, and especially if I DO crash on this protocol again, I'll likely switch back to my local clinic. In the meantime, I'm looking forward to seeing how AWESOME his results must be to generate such self-confidence!
Thanks sooooooooooooooooooo much to all of you ladies for taking the time to read and comment on this thread! Huge love to you all!
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
**********Warning SAIF mentioned************************
Me: anovulatory/DOR
DH: + antibodies
2011 IUI: #1: BFN
2011 IUI: #2: BFN
1/12 IVF #1: Lupron protocol resulting in 1 follicle --> converted to IUI = SAIF
2013 IUI #3: BFN
2013 IUI #4: BFP followed by M/C
4/14 IVF #2: FX
Btw, you're doing the same thing I used to do with tagging, and it took me a long time to figure out that it didn't work. If you copy the name from somewhere with an embedded link, it won't actually tag the person--no idea why. You have to write it afresh. Hope you don't mind this tip; just trying to spare you my frustration!
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.
***Losses mentioned.*** TTC #1 since May 2012. Me: 37, OH: 41. Ectopic August 2012 => tubal damage.