Hi ladies,
I asked your opinions a few months ago about two close friends' weddings this summer where they are not inviting kids. You all convinced me that it was a normal thing to do, and may even be more fun without having to worry about DD at the wedding. So, I'm totally fine with that, but I'm wondering, how do you think the "no kids" rule applies to infants? Two of our close friends have each just had babies, and they will be 3 and 4 months at the time of the weddings, and nursing. The new moms are concerned about leaving their babies for that long, and one of them will need to travel about 2 hours to the weddings. I tried to kind of feel out the situation with the brides, and got the impression that they don't want the babies there. What are your thoughts? Is this unreasonable? One of the friends is even a (new) pediatrician, and very openly pro-breastfeeding, but she just seems kind of clueless about what that really means.
Thanks for being a sounding board again. It helps to talk things through here sometimes rather than just sticking my nose in where it doesn't belong.

Btw, I realize this may be an issue for a FF baby at that age too, didn't mean to be exclusive!
Re: No kids at wedding, but what about babies?
Baby Boy born on 1/14/13